The Athlon 2100+ (which I believe is a palomino?) which is rated at 1.73ghz and the Athlon 2200+ (which is a T-bred?) is rated at 1.8ghz are seperated by as much as US$50, anyone have any idea why? From what I can see, neither is particularly good for overclocking... so what's the differance aside from 0.07 of speed?
I'm putting a system together and either would fit into my budget, but why pay the extra unless there is something I'm missing about the 2200?
Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
I'm putting a system together and either would fit into my budget, but why pay the extra unless there is something I'm missing about the 2200?
Any advice would be greatly appreciated.