I've recently had the pleasure of debating religion in my English class. I have been lucky, in that in the class of 24, there are only four people who would call themselves Christians, and my teacher who is a Baptist. Voicing my opinion has been fairly easy to do without fear of offending people, but has still had enough arguement to allow me to hold a good conversation. Much unlike my Socials class of last year, with only three people out of thirty not believing in 'God.' These people consisted of my Girlfriend, another friend and myself.

I found it interesting though that due to the poll of the class (on who believes in 'god'), I managed to be called evil by one of the most evil people I have ever seen. Apparently he believed in God.
The thing that bothers me the most about religion, Christianity in particular, is that its followers are all basing their faith upon a single book. A single book which was written centuries ago, and could have been written by anybody. If I was to profess myself the son of a 'God' today, people wouldn't believe me. I would probably end up being shunned from any social life I might indulge myself in. However, if I was to do the same thing, and write a book entailing my beliefs, and the reasons for them, etc., Perhaps the same thing would happen today (infact, I would expect people to think me a freak), however, in a few hundred years, when the world had forgotten that I was a crazy lunatic, might people then look at my book objectivly? If it had ideals which appealed to some, would it then become the basis of a new belief system? What?! The people would have nothing more than a book, written by some insane soul of the 21'st century! How could they know that I was the son of 'God'? All they had was a book. Though unlikely, it is possible. And it
has happened. How is that any different than Christianity. Show me one fact that can prove otherwise. It is a shame though, that there is nowhere to find these facts in places other than a book...
It seems to me as though the only reason that Christianity was created was due to a fear of death. Without a soul, there is no 'afterlife.' Without an afterlife, there is no drive for Christians to keep to the teachings of their 'God.' So, you've led a good life, and held by all commandments. That's wonderful, you should feel good about youself, I know I would be a happy person having fulfilled my life by the ideals put forth in the book. What is your reward for leading that life so virtuoisly though? Now that you are dead, should you not be rewarded for your good deads? You cannot die, and simply have that be the end of you; what a scary thought. Not being reincarnated, not being sent to the heavens; simply being dead. Gone. That alone, without the fear of being sent to a 'hell' for having led a not-so-virtuous life would be enough for many people to profess to any given religion. People are scared of not having a soul - which religion offers.
I find it intriguing that when I am asked to write an essay, it is made clear that I am to site as many sources as possible, and that my information be accountable, and up to date. Were I to quote from a single book, with no known authour, which was written centuries ago, I would be told that my sources were not believable. They would not create a strong enough arguement to prove whatever point I tried to make. Why then, should the beliefs by which we lead our lives be any different?