AT&T will Launch it's own Streaming Service

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

gorcorps

aka Brandon
Jul 18, 2004
30,741
456
126
Wonder if you could just call and get it by giving an excuse to why you can't put up a dish.

I've thought about that. Hopefully they don't check their records and see that I had their service a couple years ago and told them to screw off after my contract was up =P

I read online that if you call and claim your landlord won't allow you to install a satellite they might give you a break. You just don't have to mention that you ARE the landlord...
 

13Gigatons

Diamond Member
Apr 19, 2005
7,461
500
126
It's live now: directvnow.com

100 channels for only $35

Free Apple TV if 3 months prepaid

HBO add on is only $5
 

13Gigatons

Diamond Member
Apr 19, 2005
7,461
500
126
So far I don't like Streaming TV. Didn't like Slingtv or Playstation Vue free trial.

I prefer the netflix model. Watch a show without commercials when you want. Don't understand the need for "channels" anymore, only live stuff people need too see is weather and sports.
 

Fritzo

Lifer
Jan 3, 2001
41,920
2,161
126
I prefer the netflix model. Watch a show without commercials when you want. Don't understand the need for "channels" anymore, only live stuff people need too see is weather and sports.
Since you don't understand I'll explain it to you:

"Channels" (or Networks) coordinate and produce shows for consumption. To get money to do this, they have to sell advertising spots, and this generates their income. Once a show is no longer new, it may be given to a streaming service like Netflix or Hulu in order to get licensing revenue, which comes from those monthly subscription fees.

So, without networks, we wouldn't get any content for the streaming services to broadcast. Nexflix, Hulu, Amazon, and so on are experimenting with original content, but you'll notice they each have a limited number of shows because they're expensive to produce. That $10/month only stretches so far.
 

13Gigatons

Diamond Member
Apr 19, 2005
7,461
500
126
Since you don't understand I'll explain it to you:

"Channels" (or Networks) coordinate and produce shows for consumption. To get money to do this, they have to sell advertising spots, and this generates their income. Once a show is no longer new, it may be given to a streaming service like Netflix or Hulu in order to get licensing revenue, which comes from those monthly subscription fees.

So, without networks, we wouldn't get any content for the streaming services to broadcast. Nexflix, Hulu, Amazon, and so on are experimenting with original content, but you'll notice they each have a limited number of shows because they're expensive to produce. That $10/month only stretches so far.

Channels are dying. More shows are moving to streaming services and this trend will probably continue. Netflix, Hulu, Amazon, Epix, HBO, etc. have some really good shows.

Streaming services have less limits on content and run time as well.
 

Fritzo

Lifer
Jan 3, 2001
41,920
2,161
126
Channels are dying. More shows are moving to streaming services and this trend will probably continue. Netflix, Hulu, Amazon, Epix, HBO, etc. have some really good shows.

Streaming services have less limits on content and run time as well.

While I agree that scheduled broadcasts may become a thing of the past, networks definitely are not dying. The advertising model of revenue is always going to be there.