Just another way of bilking more money out of their customers. I have a hard time believing it costs AT&T $15 and $25 to send 200MB and 2GB of data respectively.$15/200 MB, $25/2GB, and $45/unlimited (ACTUALLY unlimited, no 5 GB cap) with tethering is much more fair.
Exactly.The change is a step back technology wise, to increase profits...
Just another way of bilking more money out of their customers. I have a hard time believing it costs AT&T $15 and $25 to send 200MB and 2GB of data respectively.
If AT&T wanted to be fair, they would charge a flat per KB rate.
200MB is a decent amount for a smartphone. I use about 150MB a month which is full of web browsing, youtube video, google maps, facebook and others on my Blackjack 2. I use my phone A LOT. The 2GB seems impossible for me to touch unless I were to tether.
FOR INDIVIDUAL PLANS IN THE UNITED STATES:
VERIZON:
Unlimited Talk = $70 a month
Unlimited Text = $20 a month
25 MB Data = $10 a month <--- this is a joke data plan since most will be forced to go for 5 GB plan.
5 GB Data = $30 a month
Tethering = $30 a month
Data over 5 GB = $0.05 per MB
-----
AT&T:
Unlimited Talk = $70 a month
Unlimited Text = $20 a month
200 MB Data = $15 a month <--- 68 % of users
2 GB Data = $25 a month <--- 98 % of users user less than 2 GB
3 GB Data = $35 a month
Tethering = $20 a month <--- less than Verizon
Data over 3 GB = $0.05 per MB ??? or is this $10 per 1 GB until you reach 5 GB, then you pay $0.05 per MB?
I just checked my data usage and I avg about 250mb a month - with one spike up to like 450mb - on my iphone.
So I guess I am in the ~98% that stands to 'gain' $5 a month or so. Still, that being said, as a consumer it pains me to see unlimited dropped.
I don't understand all the angst on the blogs however, especially since ATT has said you can keep your 'unlimited' plan if you want to. I wonder how long before Verizon follows suit, especially as it was their c-level execs who started this drumbeat of pay-for-usage iirc.
- AT&T will continue to offer the $14.99 250/MB data plan for the iPad. It will not be reduced to the 200 MB cap the carrier will be offering on its cheaper smartphone plan.
- iPad users reaching their 2 GB limit under the forthcoming plan will be able to initiate a new monthly cycle on demand with a new start date. This would appear to make the iPad plan more of a "2 GB or 30 days, whichever comes first" cycle than a "30 days with 2 GB cap plus overage fees" cycle, with the exception being that users will have to manually initiate a new cycle should they reach their 2 GB cap before the end of the billing cycle.
- iPhone users can bump up from the $15 200 MB data plan to the $25 2 GB plan without penalty as long as they initiate the change before the end of the desired billing cycle. This will allow users on the lower tier to simply bump up to the $25 plan as needed rather than having to pay $15 per additional 200 MB over the initial 200 MB limit. Users can then bump themselves back down for their next billing cycle. It is unclear at this time whether users on the higher tier will be able to drop down to the lower tier mid-cycle if they see that their data usage will be low for that period.
So, how much bandwidth are you guys using? If you stream music during work hours, how much bandwidth is that? I've used 5.5GB total (up + down) in the last 14 months. To me this will actually save me money with zero impact on my usage - about the only thing that it will do is that I'll probably check a bit more often what my usage actually is.
Since I'll have a grandfathered $30/month unlimited plan, I don't need to change.
But I'm probably dropping to the $15/200MB plan as soon as it's available and then changing it to the 2GB/month limit when I see that I'm above the 200MB. It will require watching my usage more closely... but for $180/year savings I'm willing to check more often.
About the only thing that I'm disappointed about is that the $15/month plan isn't more like 400MB because then I could probably move to that and stay there and not worry about it.
Seems like most of the people who are pissed off about these changes are streaming audio for 8-10 hrs per day at work. If that's you, don't change your plan and you'll be grandfathered in. Or use wifi. Or transfer videos to your phone's memory instead of streaming from Netflix over 3G.
Meanwhile, these changes will probably make most people's monthly fees smaller. Pretty heavy iPhone user and apparently used less than 100MB per month since I got it.
Plus, since my wife wanted to get a data plan and won't be a heavy user, the 200MB plan for $15 (vs. the $30 unlimited plan) is perfect.
ATT gains more customers like this, and loses the heavy users (2GB+)... probably a win/win in their eyes.
It will probably also force a lot of traffic onto wifi as well.
Exactly... If someone was at Starbucks and wanted to stream some videos or music, they would think twice before just using 3G and maybe jump on the wifi network there. I bet there are plenty of heavy users that would just use 3G because they didn't want to have to sign into the hotspot, since the 3G is unlimited anyways...
In my opinion, the only dumb thing with these changes are:
1. tethering is $20 extra but no extra bandwidth comes with that... basically they charge you $20 to burn through your bandwidth faster.
2. They should have a higher bandwidth plan (5GB+) instead of making you pay for 2GB + 1GB + 1GB, etc... but I guess they would rather not have that customer anymore.
Time to send/flame the AT&T CEO about it!
http://consumerist.com/2007/08/updated-contact-att-ceo-randall-stephenson.html
Oh no, a cease & deist letter. Whatever will I do?http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/02/...that-emailing-the-ceo-will-result-in-a-cease/
HAHA, AT&T is such a gang of flaming assholes 🙂
Oh no, a cease & deist letter. Whatever will I do?