I don't think it actually specifies the speed on the box. But even if they did, I still think it's misleading to sell it as a 9600 pro when it's actually slower than a standard spec 9600 pro. It's like if you bought an Athlon 64 2800+ "ez version" which only has half the L2 cache (wait.... isn't this called a sempron ? that is, clearly differentiating the models). And BTW, this was more than a year ago, and for a few months I actually believed it was a normal 9600 pro, I wasn't aware of the "EZ version" scam, and as far as I know this designation is not a legitimate standard designation, like the "pro", "se" or "xt" designations.
Bottom line: powercolor is a scumbag company, their cheap junk is not even worth it, because who knows what corners they're going to cut next. People, are you with me ? down with powercolor !
Bottom line: powercolor is a scumbag company, their cheap junk is not even worth it, because who knows what corners they're going to cut next. People, are you with me ? down with powercolor !
