ASUS spec inconsistencies (Manual vs. Web)

[Nova Cat]

So I'm browsing the X299 lineup on the Asus website and am noticing a few things wrong when comparing the motherboard manual PDF file and the specs on the website.

Example: ROG Strix x299-E Gaming shows 4000 for the max memory https://dlsvr04.asus.com/pub/ASUS/m...ING/E12781_ROG_STRIX_X299-E_GAMING_UM_WEB.pdf

Here it shows max at 4133
https://www.asus.com/us/Motherboards/ROG-STRIX-X299-E-GAMING/specifications/

There are also differences in regards to quad GPU support, with the manual including nothing about "quad" but the website does. Anyone noticed this before? Would you rely on the manual PDF document or are both sources possibly flawed?

 

[RLGL]

I would tend to rely on the website for the latest info but cannot vouch for the accuracy of either.

 

[dlerious]

website is usually more up to date than manual.