For what I want and expect, I do have to spend above $160 on a motherboard. Low end boards do not have the features I want.
No you don't.. that's just what sites like this want you to think.
Maybe having say, 6-8 SATA ports is a plus for a media center, but a lot of new "features" coming out like dual lan ports are just laughably absurd.
Not all of us need the extra slots to be able to run triple video cards, 32gb of RAM, a dozen usb ports, and the ability to overclock between 4-5ghz, etc. A minimalist approach goes a long way today.. and you can save money by doing things like getting mobos without the digital video and audio out for instance, since many of us are running video cards capable of HDMI anyway.
With a theory like im suprised you havent had to RMA yet. With that low of a price you either get no performance, or no quality.
I don't know where some of you get this from. There is NO performance difference to be found, what-so-ever, by going with an entry level board.. it will not "gimp" the performance .. there is also no evidence to show that entry level boards have "lower quality" components other than gossip among forum-goers to help justify spending so much for their motherboards.
They even offer the same exact warranty (3 yrs), regardless of how low or high end you go. You would think if the components were truly inferior, that they would only have enough confidence to offer a 1 yr warranty with the entry level boards.. but that isn't the case.