• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

>>> Asus P4G8X-D <<<

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Still waiting on my board, since ordering on Wednesday. :|

Shows to be out for delivery today, finally. 😛

Geeezzze Thugs - you are half a continent further (Texas/Florida from California)
and you get yours first. 😉

That's what I get for being cheap and using free shipping.
rolleye.gif


How's that 200 coming? I was thinking that the chipset might be more stable
and give you a higher OC than you were getting on your P4B533.
 
all the det 40s do nothing but crash crash crash.
the 4180s were doing really good ~ but they also randomly crash for no reason.
det 40 quality leaves much to be desired too.

ran M86 last night ~ passed 195fsb easily with turbo on 🙂
still gotta work on 200........
 
Thanks for the info Thugsrook...are you gaining any ground on 200fsb? At what point are you gonna plug your 2.26b in? 🙂😉

What's your overall opinion of the board so far? 🙂
 
Originally posted by: Mikki
Thanks for the info Thugsrook...are you gaining any ground on 200fsb? At what point are you gonna plug your 2.26b in? 🙂😉

What's your overall opinion of the board so far? 🙂

if i dont get 200 tonight, its getting pulled ~ then im going over to Erik's house and stealing his 2.4b (shhhh dont tell him) 😉

the board itself is awesome 🙂
super solid, super stable, super easy ~ its super 😉 😀
as you can see by the benchmarks the real power is just starting @ 166fsb....
 
i did verify that agp/pci lock (80/40) does work @ 197fsb.

Auto also works and gives better benchmarks then locked .....:Q
rolleye.gif
😱
 
Crazy man! Crazy!

:Q


Pj




Originally posted by: THUGSROOK
i did verify that agp/pci lock (80/40) does work @ 197fsb.

Auto also works and gives better benchmarks then locked .....:Q
rolleye.gif
😱

 
Originally posted by: THUGSROOK
i did verify that agp/pci lock (80/40) does work @ 197fsb.

Auto also works and gives better benchmarks then locked .....:Q
rolleye.gif
😱
That's cool...I wonder if it steps up at certain fsb's like it did on my -E? 🙂
 
thx Phocas 🙂

its a shame cause if it woulda got to 200fsb i prolly woulda left well enough alone.
but insted im gonna hafta install my 2.26b (can do 167fsb) and give you guys another review 😉

(ill just append to this one)

😀
 

COMMON PARTS
P4m 1.7 8/21/02 SL6DC b0 (12x multiplier)
Alpha HSF | Panaflo M1A | ASII
XMS3000 2x 256mb | SBLive 5.1 | Enermax 550w
GF4600 @ 320x714 | 30.82 drivers | Win98SE

> Asus P4B533 i845e < 2400mhz 200fsb 400ddr 2.0-2-2-7 / 2.6v
> Asus P4G8XD e7205 < 2340mhz 195fsb 390ddr 2.5-3-3-7 / Turbo / 2.7v


BENCHMARKS 1024x768x32

> 3DMark2001 <
P4B533 = 12417
P4G8XD = 12397

> X-Isle Demo <

P4B533 = 133.8
P4G8XD = 144.2

> Quake III Arena <

P4B533 = 226.4
P4G8XD = 237.1

> UT2003 Demo <
Flyby --- Botmatch
P4B533 = 165.1 --- 66.4
P4G8XD = 165.7 --- 66.2

> Scisoft Sandra 2003 <
memory
P4B533 = 2977/2873
P4G8XD = 4895/4867



but the problem is that the P4B533 can run this chip @ 225fsb stable ~ so the real winner is the P4B533 😉
P4B533 thread
 
The 2.26 results should be more applicable to the "average" overclocker that doesn't use a mobile chip, and stays to a closer to Earth FSB speed???
 
we'll see tonight oldfart 😉

ive always said the p4b533 is an awesome board and will be the cheapest alternative to canterwood 800fsb 😀
 
someone or something should be paying you, man ( obviously, your'e having a blast 😀 )!!!

.... this is great stuff

maybe i'll pay you since im getting so much out of all this, it'll be like another cable bill ( $120 a month sound good? 😀 )
 
Back
Top