Ok so... i know it's been a little while, but did this ever get solved?
I have a Very similar question and situation.
I have an Asus Crosshair v1 (AM2), with an old FX-62 in it. I want the "best" possible cpu on this board, before i deem it "finished." The compatibility list shows the (125w) 9950 BE, as the "best" compatible option.
However, i am having trouble finding any direct AM2: "FX-62 vs. 9950" comparison charts.
FX-62 = 2.8GHz dual core
9950 = 2.6GHz quad.
Asus says the board will accept the chip, and that it's compatible through a BIOS update, which is available on the site.
Will the 9950 be "crippled" in any way, by the AM2 socket?
Are 2 of the 9950 cores @2.6, as fast or faster than the 2 cores of the FX-62?
I would imagine the answer is "yes, the 9950 is Way better than the FX-62."
But by how much? Is it worth dropping in the 9950? Or is the 9950 just not "that" much better than the FX-62, on the AM2 platform?
If anyone knows, if anyone has tried it, i'd like to know. I just want what's best for *this* rig, before i stop messing with it altogether, once the AM3+/990FX boards release. This old rig will then be my backup:
Lian-Li PC-60b PLUS
FX-62 (Zalman 9700CNPS)
Crosshair v1
2x2Gb DDR2@800MHz
8800gt SLI
PCP&C Silencer 750
I was actually thinking of using this box as my first attempt at water cooling... But i might just throw a few giant heatsinks in there, (thermalright 120, 2x T-rad2, bunch o fans...) Mild OC, and call it done. I've been running it stock w/ a single 8800gt, for the last few years. I'm ready to squeeze the last out of it.
So... FX-62 vs. 9950 (125w TDP)
Worth it or not?