ASUS GTX780Ti DC2OC _ VRM are Very Very HoT!

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Fastx

Senior member
Dec 18, 2008
780
0
0
Sensors Mis-Placment?

1061683547.jpg

Not sure on your pic but I am going by that Guru is measuring the correct VRM area for those temps with their TC. The ASUS rep says its a wrong sensor reading but Guru shows with their TC the temp to be around 100c. I don't know the Asus card well or VRM placement on the board but right now I am leaning to Gurus' finding at this point imo
 

bononos

Diamond Member
Aug 21, 2011
3,943
190
106
Not sure on your pic but I am going by that Guru is measuring the correct VRM area for those temps with their TC. The ASUS rep says its a wrong sensor reading but Guru shows with their TC the temp to be around 100c. I don't know the Asus card well or VRM placement on the board but right now I am leaning to Gurus' finding at this point imo

The previous Asus reply came from here after googling which refers to the R9 290 which isn't the same card as the 780ti.

http://www.kitguru.net/components/g...-direct-cu-ii-oc-review-1600p-ultra-hd-4k/28/
The Asus rep explained that the sensor is not placed correct next to the vrm and max ir temp in guru3d could be picking up the max temperature of some other component (don't know if that sounds plausible). That could be easily verified by eyeballing if the sensor is visible on the pcb. The rep didn't explain why the core gpu temps are lowered by an offset though.
edit:
http://rog.asus.com/forum/showthread.php?46389-ASUS-GTX780Ti-DC2OC-_-VRM-are-Very-Very-HoT!/page3
 
Last edited:

Fastx

Senior member
Dec 18, 2008
780
0
0
The previous Asus reply came from here after googling which refers to the R9 290 which isn't the same card as the 780ti.

http://www.kitguru.net/components/g...-direct-cu-ii-oc-review-1600p-ultra-hd-4k/28/
The Asus rep explained that the sensor is not placed correct next to the vrm and max ir temp in guru3d could be picking up the max temperature of some other component (don't know if that sounds plausible). That could be easily verified by eyeballing if the sensor is visible on the pcb. The rep didn't explain why the core gpu temps are lowered by an offset though.

I don't know sounds like a little tricky talk going on imo but I could be wrong. I am going on Guru TC pics so even if the sensor is misplaced they are still getting a high reading. I first read on that forum that the sensor was reading the temps incorrectly not that it was misplaced I believe.
 
Last edited:

rgallant

Golden Member
Apr 14, 2007
1,361
11
81
you have to wonder why some peeps go to water after post/threads x [? 110k] about gpu high temps in every forum.
-until big max. comes out with 14 billion trannies under 150 watts ,water is still cool imo
 
Last edited:

Attic

Diamond Member
Jan 9, 2010
4,282
2
76
Add more airflow over that area if it's not too difficult to do in your case. VRM's run hot on the newer cards, but it's been generally due to lousy engineering of the cooling setup. So it's often a pretty straightforward adjustment to get better temps. Either upgrade/add the heatsink to vrm's or add some more air movement over it.
 

Deders

Platinum Member
Oct 14, 2012
2,401
1
91
What do people think about the possibility of solder melting at these high temps?
 

3DVagabond

Lifer
Aug 10, 2009
11,951
204
106
What do people think about the possibility of solder melting at these high temps?

Alloys commonly used for electrical soldering are 60/40 Tin/lead (Sn/Pb) which melts at 370 °F or 188 °C and 63/37 Sn/Pb used principally in electrical/electronic work. The 63/37 is a eutectic alloy, which: has the lowest melting point (183 °C or 361.4 °F) of all the tin/lead alloys

No.
 

Attic

Diamond Member
Jan 9, 2010
4,282
2
76
haha yea, I missed that. But glad 3DV posted, Deders had me thinking.