Asus A7V333 Review (KT333)

[NucleusWDS]

Asus A7V333 review now available .... HERE

 

[cmaMath13]

Thanks for the link. I am a big Asus fan, so I hope the new mobo lives up to the Asus name.

 

[ElFenix]

looks like athlon will be quite a bit better with 166 FSB and RAM. too bad we're still stuck with 64 bit cache access.

 

[Kurupshin]

WORST REVIEW EVER. I LOSE ALL RESPECT FROM THAT SITE.

They review a KT333 chipset without having DDR333 Capable RAM. What a bunch of BS. THEY SUCK!

 

[John]

<< WORST REVIEW EVER. I LOSE ALL RESPECT FROM THAT SITE.

They review a KT333 chipset without having DDR333 Capable RAM. What a bunch of BS. THEY SUCK! >>



The person that posted this thread runs AMD3D.com. I found the review quite entertaining, and I thought he did a good job.

 

[Kurupshin]

Wow that is pathetic. The owner of a website posts a review for a DDR333 board and he doesn't have Ram capable of running at 333 Mhz. Some review there. Thats like doing an overclocking article and only having a golden orb as your heatsink.

 

[BD231]

Kurupshin, you need to be quiet, you havent done your homework. There is no real world performance difference with DDR333 because an athlon has only 2.1gb's a sec of bandwith, which DDR 266 already offers.

 

[cmaMath13]

Looks good to me. In fact, it look very nice indeed!

 

[Kurupshin]

<< Kurupshin, you need to be quiet, you havent done your homework. There is no real world performance difference with DDR333 because an athlon has only 2.1gb's a sec of bandwith, which DDR 266 already offers. >>



Too bad you haven't done your homework and don't realize you don't get full bandwith utilization which shows the need for DDR333.

GGKTHXBYE

 

[j@cko]

<< Too bad you haven't done your homework and don't realize you don't get full bandwith utilization which shows the need for DDR333. >>



Actually the performance gain is less than 5% or even less..... so.. who's the idiot here?