The story was so bad in the first one, I haven't played another. I don't care how cool the fight cinematics look because I know the game won't look like that and I don't have faith the story will be anything except awful.
The story was so bad in the first one, I haven't played another. I don't care how cool the fight cinematics look because I know the game won't look like that and I don't have faith the story will be anything except awful.
No way...it was as bad as the tower defense was before. Absolutely stupid.
I respectfully disagree. Could be really great fleshed out. Been a while since we've had a decent naval battle game.
the story was fine (IMO), it was the execution of the game that sucked. sooo frustrating at times. the 2nd was such an improvement it was unreal
I seriously hated the first game. I don't know why anyone that played that one would ever want to play another one again.
I loved the series until AC3, in my eyes they have to win me back as a afan i will not purchase this game just on the name alone.
What about AC3 did you not like? I thought the game was good and we got a lot of revealing story. However, I don't see why we will now go play in the past again when we just found out what Minerva wanted with Desmond. Really the way AC3 ended it seemed like we should now have all the clues from the past and just need to be in the present time.
For me it was boring. Also this was the 4th AC I'd played and I"m just tired of it...it's not the type of game for me I can play a brand new game every year. I also have never paid attention to the story as I didn't really care, so that part wasn't important to me.