And in comparison? What do you think of the two?
why?
Low energy consumption when playing movies. The 5350 uses 18W playing
mkv movies.
This tiny pc is too limited in almost any function. The Q1900 mini ITX board is far more powerfull and above all................a standardized platform.have you considered something like the ECS Liva? it's not very expensive and the power usage is even betterhttp://anandtech.com/show/8262/ecs-liva-review-the-nettop-rises-again/512W for prime+furmark
The truth is however that a desktop tower that consumes <10 watts on idle would be even better."ideal for efficient imaging workflows, digital signage with secure content delivery, visually appealing interactive clients (interactive kiosks, intelligent vending, ATM, and point-of-sale (POS) terminals), portable medical devices, industrial control systems, and In-Vehicle Infotainment (IVI) systems". link
As miniaturisation slows down does the gap between (ultra)mobile and desktop become bigger or smaller?
I checked Anandtech Bench for the J1900, which for some inexplicable reason is called a Celeron, it's just slightly slower than a core 2 or an Athlon II x4, so that's five years, is it?
Having fallen for the idea of fast enough once with the Atom, the trouble on the desktop is that there isn't any software developed to run well on smaller MHz, unlike with the millions of smart-phones.
Intel also tried to sell the small form-factor, in the form of NUC and similar stuff, which are brilliantly power saving on idle, but have some performance reserves. It's an improvement over the Nettop idea, sure those nettops are great for specific stuff, like home automation, streaming or whatever. Intel also market them as such,The truth is however that a desktop tower that consumes <10 watts on idle would be even better.
Just how hot does it get, passive cooling kind of needs to get hot to work.
Intel decided to relabel Bay Trail (Atom "3.0") to now house both the Celeron and Pentium names :|
So even though this particular J1900 is a "quad core" Bay Trail Celeron, it's single-thread performance is still about 1/2 that of a typical Ivy-Bridge/Haswell-based Celeron.
Mystery why you'd want one. I have a 4770 non K in this porn box with the sole purpose of being liquid fast for everything I do. Buying something that cheap and slow just limits what you can do with it.
I will do a measurement later on.Just how hot does it get, passive cooling kind of needs to get hot to work.
How much faster is your i3 or your G3220 at web browsing than this PC?
If you're only web browsing would you take the i3, G3220, or the J1900?
I did a test out of curiosity and my Celeron 1007U (IvyBridge @ 1.5GHz) was about 30% faster overall than a J1900 Bay Trail using Google's Octane web benchmark. Not that I think BayTrail is too slow for basic tasks but it certainly will be obsolete sooner than the i3 or G3220.
I'm using one loaded with Windows 8.1 on a Crucial M500 and 8GB of memory.Asrock Q1900DC-ITX experience
Just assembled this board in a tiny pc housing: Chieftec/IX-03B-OP with a cheap 12V/3A adapter(the 1 I used with the 5350 combo).
Idle: 9-10W
Prime 95: 18W
Prime95+Furmark: 27W
It feels reasonably fast when surfing(11W) or playing a mkv(13W).