• We should now be fully online following an overnight outage. Apologies for any inconvenience, we do not expect there to be any further issues.

Ask Bin Laden if I'm an appeaser

Oct 16, 1999
10,490
4
0
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2011/12/08/143356742/obama-ask-osama-bin-laden-if-im-an-appeaser

Republican presidential candidates have said President Obama practices "appeasement" when it comes to foreign policy.

At the White House a short time ago, the president had this response:

"Ask Osama bin Laden and the 22 out of 30 top al-Qaida leaders who've been taken off the field whether I engage in appeasement. Or whoever's left out there. Ask them about that."

This was just too awesome to wait for a full article.

Now with video:
http://www.businessinsider.com/boom-obama-just-played-the-bin-laden-card-2011-12
Boom indeed.
 
Last edited:

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
AQ is not foreign policy. It is a search/destroy mission.
Afghanistan, Pakistan are foreign policy.
then what about the rest of the world that he does nothing to resolve.
Libya, "no boots on the ground" and false interaction. no fly zone directive was greatly exceed
Syria - continue to allow the massacres - words of scolding from Clinton on his behalf.


Smple examples
 

Arkaign

Lifer
Oct 27, 2006
20,736
1,379
126
AQ is not foreign policy. It is a search/destroy mission.
Afghanistan, Pakistan are foreign policy.
then what about the rest of the world that he does nothing to resolve.
Libya, "no boots on the ground" and false interaction. no fly zone directive was greatly exceed
Syria - continue to allow the massacres - words of scolding from Clinton on his behalf.


Smple examples

I'm no fan of Obama, but I don't think Bush or anyone else would be handling things differently regarding Libya and Syria.

What were we really supposed to do in Libya? March in? With what? We're broke as a nation as it is. I don't think the US public would have allowed it.

Similar is Syria, but that's actually more difficult, because the coalition against Syria would be much harder to form, and unlike Libya, they're not all that isolated (think Iran!).

I think too many people forgot the example Reagan made when the marine barracks were bombed in Lebanon in the 80s. Hundreds of our nations finest blown to pieces by fundamentalist assholes, and we didn't go to war over it. We did the smart thing, we GTFO and said good riddance to them, with no additional loss of life.

Sometimes not getting into further overseas complications IS smart foreign policy. Policy is not necessarily defined by action, inaction can be a good concept as well depending on circumstances.

Obama has failed many times on many things, but foreign policy is not ripe territory to complain about.
 

Nintendesert

Diamond Member
Mar 28, 2010
7,761
5
0
Ultimately nobody really gives a shit about foreign policy when there are no jobs in America. I feel bad for the man that all he has is killing OBL. He turned around and failed to get us out of Afghanistan and Pakistan after doing it when we could have left with honor and on our terms. Now we get to do a continued slow bleed in those two shithole countries. Not sure how much a win that OBL killing really was.
 

Ausm

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
25,213
14
81
I'm no fan of Obama, but I don't think Bush or anyone else would be handling things differently regarding Libya and Syria.

What were we really supposed to do in Libya? March in? With what? We're broke as a nation as it is. I don't think the US public would have allowed it.

Similar is Syria, but that's actually more difficult, because the coalition against Syria would be much harder to form, and unlike Libya, they're not all that isolated (think Iran!).

I think too many people forgot the example Reagan made when the marine barracks were bombed in Lebanon in the 80s. Hundreds of our nations finest blown to pieces by fundamentalist assholes, and we didn't go to war over it. We did the smart thing, we GTFO and said good riddance to them, with no additional loss of life.

Sometimes not getting into further overseas complications IS smart foreign policy. Policy is not necessarily defined by action, inaction can be a good concept as well depending on circumstances.

Obama has failed many times on many things, but foreign policy is not ripe territory to complain about.

That's because he can do everything by Executive order bypassing the Republican's incessant obstructionism in Congress.
 

Arkaign

Lifer
Oct 27, 2006
20,736
1,379
126
Ultimately nobody really gives a shit about foreign policy when there are no jobs in America. I feel bad for the man that all he has is killing OBL. He turned around and failed to get us out of Afghanistan and Pakistan after doing it when we could have left with honor and on our terms. Now we get to do a continued slow bleed in those two shithole countries. Not sure how much a win that OBL killing really was.

Afaik, both Iraq and Afghanistan policy was largely dictated by treaties and agreements signed previous to O taking office.

The Osama killing was most important in taking the pretense off of Pakistan as an ally. They're not, and have never been. Only Musharraf was something of a pragmatic friend, but the country, it's government and people, hate us absolutely.

Agreed about the economy. It's the most important thing, and the fact that Obama has proven just fine at foreign policy means jack shit in the big picture. In the post-Soviet era, it's a lot less important imho, outside of economics. Besides, wars are VERY expensive and counter-productive to domestic economic growth unless you're literally looking at a situation where the rest of the world's manufacturing base can be largely destroyed (WW2).
 

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0
Obama will be known as one of the great American presidents on foreign policy. In addition to his statement, he is also cultivating the future of US relations with a fundamental shift from a trans-Atlantic relationship with Europe to strong relationships with the emerging powers. He is a Pacific President re-emphasizing the Pacific aspect of America rather than the old, archaic, and failed Atlantic.
 

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
We should have either stayed out of Libya or been honest in what we were going to do. No fly zone is not close air support.

The same goes for Syria. Setup a no fly zone and attack anything that is related to the Syrian military. give the opposition a chance to remove the government.

Screw Iran the rest of the Arab league is onboard
 

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
AQ is not foreign policy. It is a search/destroy mission.
Afghanistan, Pakistan are foreign policy.
then what about the rest of the world that he does nothing to resolve.
Libya, "no boots on the ground" and false interaction. no fly zone directive was greatly exceed
Syria - continue to allow the massacres - words of scolding from Clinton on his behalf.


Smple examples
I don't particularly want my President thinking he has to resolve the rest of the world, only to kill those actively engaged in harming us and to support those who support us. In that respect, I think Obama's done a pretty fair job in foreign policy, all in all. I really didn't like the way he refused to get Congressional approval for the Libyan war, but I'll support him in taking action. I try to always assume that the President, whether or not I generally support him, has well considered and valid reasons for taking the country to war, and if Libya was only about supporting our NATO allies, well, it works both ways. We can't ask them to support our ventures unless we support them in theirs.

WRT Syria, I don't think we can afford a third ground war, and Syria is a lot better equipped with Russian air defenses than was Libya so we can't do an air war on the cheap there. And while I consider Syria to be one of the world's most evil and destructive countries, I have little to no faith that a democracy there would be more Western-friendly.

All in all I give Obama pretty good marks on foreign policy, and that's where the President has the most control.
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
35,793
10,088
136
Ask Bin Laden if I'm an appeaser

No, you're a nation builder. Instead of coin you pay for their appeasement in our own blood AND coin. Same as Bush. You're worse than an appeaser.
 

xBiffx

Diamond Member
Aug 22, 2011
8,232
2
0
No, you're a nation builder. Instead of coin you pay for their appeasement in our own blood AND coin. Same as Bush. You're worse than an appeaser.

Yeah but Bush with a Nobel Peace Prize. :whiste:
 

momeNt

Diamond Member
Jan 26, 2011
9,290
352
126
Hopefully this was taken out of context. "Foreign Policy" is not specifically about how you deal with people who commit acts of war against your country.

Foreign Policy if terrorists fly planes into buildings on home soil - Ask OBL
Foreign Policy if Stephen Harper has a disagreement with Obama - Do NOT ask OBL, doubtful if he knows.
 

cybrsage

Lifer
Nov 17, 2011
13,021
0
0
No appeasement here:

4105514028_ce721bc90e.jpg


In Japanese culture, the underling bows the lowest...the further below the other person, the lower the bow. Obama, being an equal to the Emporer of Japan, should have met the Emporer's bow. Instead, he bows as low as the janitor.

Here he is, grovelling before the Saudi King:

obama-bow.jpg


He is the King's EQUAL...not an underling.
 

Arkaign

Lifer
Oct 27, 2006
20,736
1,379
126
No appeasement here:

4105514028_ce721bc90e.jpg


In Japanese culture, the underling bows the lowest...the further below the other person, the lower the bow. Obama, being an equal to the Emporer of Japan, should have met the Emporer's bow. Instead, he bows as low as the janitor.

Here he is, grovelling before the Saudi King:

obama-bow.jpg


He is the King's EQUAL...not an underling.

hah, that was another of the dumbest criticisms of Obama as well. Who honestly gives a F about some obscure social gestures that are utterly meaningless in the big picture. For fucks sake Bush Sr. BARFED on the Jap prime minister back in the day, lol. Did I think that was anything but hilarious? Not really.

Domestic policy, budget, economy, jobs, and the state of our "free" democratic republic are 10,000,000,000,000x more important than this little petty bullshit.

BOTH sides are guilty of these retarded distractions of course.
 

airdata

Diamond Member
Jul 11, 2010
4,987
0
0
Spidey : I'm disappointed you didn't also post the video of the russian people punking obama and refusing to shake his hand... That was pretty good.

Not having a shoe thrown at you during a press conference good... but it's pretty good.

bush-abdulah-holding-hands.jpg
 

Infohawk

Lifer
Jan 12, 2002
17,844
1
0
A good litmus test for whether you're an unreasonable right-wing hack is whether you find a way to bash BHO for killing OBL. That was a true mission accomplished for all Americans.
 

theeedude

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,197
126
Here is a Republican president bowing to a Communist dictator who murdered millions of people.
2rnk4kn.jpg
 

airdata

Diamond Member
Jul 11, 2010
4,987
0
0
A good litmus test for whether you're an unreasonable right-wing hack is whether you find a way to bash BHO for killing OBL. That was a true mission accomplished for all Americans.

Yeah. Imagine if he was born in the USA or if his real name was Teddy Osmond and he had US papers.
 

Fear No Evil

Diamond Member
Nov 14, 2008
5,922
0
0
There is no doubt that Obama can slaughter brown people without loss of American lives better than anyone else. Its just when Obama slaughters brown people the lefties giggle and cheer instead of feigning outrage like when Bush did it.