These benchmarks apparently haven't used the big core even in single-thread tests. It's essentially a 4-core Tremont and the results are pretty good seen as such.
Exclusive: First benchmarks of Intel's Lakefield Hybrid CPU - Innovative or unnecessary?
The Samsung Galaxy Book S with Intel's new Lakefield Hybrid processor has arrived in our office. We have first benchmark results for the new hybrid CPU.www.notebookcheck.net
First benchmarks. It does manage to beat the 8cx in the Galaxy Book S in the browser tests but only barely in most of them.
Frequency is pretty low on the R15 run, only getting 2.4 Ghz on the single core test and 1.9 on the multi core test. That gives a score of 255 on the MT test which is pretty low and is about what an n5000 gives anyway.
This makes a lot more sense - as expected - matching a 1035G4 in slim devices (Surface Pro etc).
)Appears to be bouncing between the big and small clusters on the R15 single core test. Seems to be working more properly on the browser tests.
Well, putting aside the lacking article and the poorly functioning benchmark, Tremont looks really good.
GB5 ST is clearly using the Sunny Cove core. In MT, probably not.
True! However, there are some GB5 results for it that run at nearly-fixed clocks close to its turbo limits. It's very easy to get data from those runs for some kind of half-arsed IPC comparison.
Obviously it's not going to be 10X. It's not available yet.
Check the name of that writer.
One of the articles about the Lenovo X1 Fold said 10X will have optimizations for it. I assumed battery life but surely scheduler is another?
I don't know how you came to that conclusion. The MT performance, therefore Tremont performance is no better than Goldmont Plus. They are pretty much at the same TDP level.
Does not need to be added, because it works nicely on the Surface Pro X. At least it would be suprising if x86 Windows does not have all the scheduler updates from Windows ARM.
Yeah, I posted the CB15 MT screenshot on the previous page, aligns perfectly with your previous theory based on benchmark scores.
They are actually reviewing it, which means they believe it's a final retail unit or equivalent.
This is how it looks on my desktop i3 7100 under Cinebench R15 ST.
Yup. It's still better than the U series but seems about the same as Y. Intel talks in their presentation that enabling Sunny Cove allows 33% better performance and 17% better perf/watt under WebXPRT 3.
Notebookcheck says the chip only clocks up to 2.4 Ghz in Singlecore workloads and ~1.9 Ghz for 100% multithreads workloads which uses 4 cores, apparently the Tremont cores. The fifth core is idling. The sreenshot is from Cinebench, so it might look different in other applications. But it's obvious that Sunny Cove isn't working in Cinebench R15/R20 Singlethread.
Looks like task manager load info ignores Sunny Cove in this case, we can see from the screenshot there a 4 cores fully loaded and the fith core is loaded with 10%, Notebookcheck says the fith cores runs with only 200-300 Mhz. Or possibly Sunny Cove is running but with 200-300 Mhz only?
Reviewers should take advantage of HWInfo more.
Facebook
Twitter