Ashcroft Outed

Perknose

Forum Director & Omnipotent Overlord
Forum Director
Oct 9, 1999
46,871
10,664
147
From today's testimony at the 9/11 commission:

"The day produced a clear-cut case of contradiction between Pickard and the man who was briefly his boss, the attorney general.

The panel's report quoted Pickard as saying Ashcroft told him in the summer of 2001 that "he did not want to hear" additional information about possible attacks, and the former FBI acting director confirmed that in his testimony.

But Ashcroft denied it forcefully.

"I did never say to him that I did not want to hear about terrorism," he said, removing his glasses for emphasis. Rather, he said, he "interrogated" him and asked him about the threat of terrorists.

Pickard also said Ashcroft did not list terrorism as a top item on his agenda when he took office.

The bureau failed miserably over several years to reorganize and respond to a steadily growing threat of terrorism, and Ashcroft rejected an agency appeal for more funding on the day before al-Qaida struck, the commission said. "


Plenty of testimony about the miserable failures of the FBI as well.
 

Gaard

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2002
8,911
1
0
Isn't he the one who stopped flying commercial during the summer of '01?
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Originally posted by: Gaard
Isn't he the one who stopped flying commercial during the summer of '01?

Ayup. And how believable can he be? He lost to a dead man in his run for Senate.
 

Perknose

Forum Director & Omnipotent Overlord
Forum Director
Oct 9, 1999
46,871
10,664
147
Harsh indictment of Asscough coming:

"Draft reports by the independent commission investigating the Sept. 11 attacks portray Attorney General John Ashcroft as largely uninterested in counterterrorism issues before Sept. 11 despite intelligence warnings that summer that Al Qaeda was planning a large, perhaps catastrophic, terrorist attack, panel officials and others with access to the reports have said.

They said the draft reports, which are expected to be completed and made public during two days of hearings by the commission this week, show that F.B.I. officials were alarmed throughout 2001 by what they perceived as Mr. Ashcroft's lack of interest in terrorism issues and his decision in August 2001 to reject the bureau's request for a large expansion of its counterterrorism programs.

The draft reports, they said, quote the F.B.I.'s former counterterrorism chief, Dale Watson, as saying he "fell off my chair" when he learned that Mr. Ashcroft had failed to list combating terrorism as one of the department's priorities in a March 2001 department-wide memo.


They said the reports would also quote from internal memorandums by Thomas J. Pickard, acting director of the F.B.I. in summer 2001, in which Mr. Pickard described his frustration with Mr. Ashcroft and what he saw as the attorney general's lack of interest in the issue of how the bureau was investigating terrorism suspects in the United States."
 

girlgeek

Member
Feb 19, 2004
55
0
0
Why is the commission releasing draft notes, when they haven't heard all the testimony? Could you provide a site for these quotes from the commission? I'd like to know more.

Thanx.
 

Jmman

Diamond Member
Dec 17, 1999
5,302
0
76
As crappy as people think Ashcroft is, just take a look at the testimony of the former attorney general, Janet Reno. Ashcroft might not be that great, but he is freakin Einstein compared to Reno.....:)
 

fjord

Senior member
Feb 18, 2004
667
0
0
If Ashcroft is angry about US policy with regard to Osama bin Laden, he's going to have to look further back than the last 10 years.

He should ask Rumsfeld just how far back--altough several others in the Bush admin, such as Cheney or Rove, could inform him just as well.
 

seti920

Member
Dec 23, 2001
175
0
76
Originally posted by: Gaard
Isn't he the one who stopped flying commercial during the summer of '01?

Hadn't heard of that, but when you consider

a. his chief political opponent died in a plane crash
b. lots of people want him dead


he may have other reasons to avoid commercial transportation.
 

heartsurgeon

Diamond Member
Aug 18, 2001
4,260
0
0
Isn't he the one who stopped flying commercial during the summer of '01?
This is just baloney
BEN-VENISTE: At some point in the spring or summer of 2001, around the time of this heightened threat alert, you apparently began to use a private chartered jet plane, changing from your use of commercial aircraft on grounds, our staff is informed, of an FBI threat assessment. And, indeed, as you told us, on September 11th itself you were on a chartered jet at the time of the attack.

Can you supply the details, sir, regarding the threat which caused you to change from commercial to private leased jet?

ASHCROFT: I am very please pleased to address this issue.

BEN-VENISTE: Thank you.

ASHCROFT: Let me indicate to you that I never ceased to use commercial aircraft for my personal travel.

ASHCROFT: My wife traveled to Germany and back in August. My wife and I traveled to Washington, D.C., on the 3rd of September before the 17th -- before the 11th attack on commercial aircraft.

I have exclusively traveled on commercial aircraft for my personal travel; continued through the year 2000, through the entirety of the threat period to the nation.

The assessment made by the security team and the Department of Justice was made early in the year. It was not related to a terrorism threat as a threat to the nation. It was related to an assessment of the security for the attorney general, given his responsibilities and the job that he undertakes. And it related to the maintenance of arms and other things by individuals who travel with the attorney general. And it was their assessment that we would be best served to use government aircraft.

These were not private chartered jet aircraft. These were aircraft of the United States government. And it was on such an aircraft that I was on my way to an event in Milwaukee on the morning of September the 11th.

you can take off your tin-foil hats now...

Ashcroft was in command during the testimony.
Ben-Veniste did not do his "attack dog" routine on him..
i think the dems have figured out that the public doesn't like these hearings turned into a political circus, and thet apear to be toning down the political rhetoric.

the glaring problem now is that Jamie Gorelick (a democrat, clinton appointee, AND MEMBER OF THE 9/11 COMMISSION) has been highlighted as a mofor reason the CIA and the FBI were not talking to eacj other!! She created the "wall" they kept talking about that prevented anyone from connecting the dots prior to 9/11. the dems have stepped into their own cowpie with the public hearings!!

Our agents were isolated by government-imposed walls, handcuffed by government-imposed restrictions and starved for basic information technology...The single greatest structural cause for the September 11th problem was the wall that segregated or separated criminal investigators and intelligence agents. Government erected this wall, government buttressed this wall and before September 11th government was blinded by this wall....In 1995, the Justice Department embraced flawed legal reasoning, imposing a series of restrictions on the FBI that went beyond what the law required. ["the wall" was written by JAMIE GORELICK!!)..

ASHCROFT: The 1995 guidelines and the procedures developed around them imposed draconian barriers, barriers between the law enforcement and intelligence communities. The wall effectively excluded prosecutors from intelligence investigations. The wall left intelligence agents afraid to talk with criminal prosecutors or agents. In 1995, the Justice Department designed a system that was destined to fail.
In the days before September 11th, the wall specifically impeded the investigation of Zacarias Moussaoui, investigation of Khalid al Mihdhar and Nawaf al Hazmi.
After the FBI arrested Moussaoui, agents became suspicious of his interest in commercial aircraft and sought approval for a criminal search warrant to search his computer. The warrant was rejected because FBI officials feared breaching the wall.

ASHCROFT: The basic architecture for the wall in the 1995 guidelines was contained in a classified memorandum entitled "Instructions for Separation of Certain Foreign Counterintelligence and Criminal Investigations."
The memorandum ordered FBI Director Louis Freeh and others, quote, "We believe that it is prudent to establish a set of instructions that will more clearly separate the counterintelligence investigation from the more limited, but continued criminal investigations.
"These procedures," the memo went on to say, "which go beyond what is legally required, will prevent any risk of creating an unwarranted appearance that FISA is being used to avoid procedural safeguards which would apply in a criminal investigation."
This memorandum laid the foundation for a wall separating the criminal and intelligence investigations, as a matter of fact, established the wall following the 1993 World Trade Center attack, which at the time was the largest international terrorism attack on American soil, the largest prior to September 11th...Full disclosure compels me to inform you that the author of this memorandum is a member of the commission [Jamie Gorelick].

By 2000, the Justice Department was so addicted to the wall it actually opposed legislation to lower the wall. Finally, the USA Patriot Act tore down this wall between our intelligence and law enforcement personnel in 2001. And when the Patriot Act was challenged, the FISA court of review upheld the law, ruling that the 1995 guidelines were required by neither the Constitution nor the law.

so basically, a bunch of Clinton lawyers created govermental barriers that prevented the dots from getting connected in regards al qaeda. the patriot act corrected the problem.
those are the unrefuted facts.

i believe the 9/11 hearings are making it abundantly clear the the Dems are not to be trusted with national security issues.
heck they want to repeal the Patriot Act which corrected the bizarre legal construct which Gorelick had created, that made it impossible to coordinate intelligence about terrorists threats. Do you rteally want these same people in charge again?
 

arsbanned

Banned
Dec 12, 2003
4,853
0
0
Bush had plenty of time to correct the situation.
That much is irrefutable.


Also, do we really want an administration who responds to a terror attack by attacking a completely unrelated nation based on phony "evidence"?

I think not.
 

CADsortaGUY

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
25,162
1
76
www.ShawCAD.com
Originally posted by: arsbanned
Bush had plenty of time to correct the situation.
That much is irrefutable.


Also, do we really want an administration who responds to a terror attack by attacking a completely unrelated nation based on phony "evidence"?

I think not.

We attacked Afghanistan on phony "evidence"? :confused:

CkG
 

Shuxclams

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
9,286
15
81
Originally posted by: heartsurgeon
Isn't he the one who stopped flying commercial during the summer of '01?
This is just baloney
BEN-VENISTE: At some point in the spring or summer of 2001, around the time of this heightened threat alert, you apparently began to use a private chartered jet plane, changing from your use of commercial aircraft on grounds, our staff is informed, of an FBI threat assessment. And, indeed, as you told us, on September 11th itself you were on a chartered jet at the time of the attack.

Can you supply the details, sir, regarding the threat which caused you to change from commercial to private leased jet?

ASHCROFT: I am very please pleased to address this issue.

BEN-VENISTE: Thank you.

ASHCROFT: Let me indicate to you that I never ceased to use commercial aircraft for my personal travel.

ASHCROFT: My wife traveled to Germany and back in August. My wife and I traveled to Washington, D.C., on the 3rd of September before the 17th -- before the 11th attack on commercial aircraft.

I have exclusively traveled on commercial aircraft for my personal travel; continued through the year 2000, through the entirety of the threat period to the nation.

The assessment made by the security team and the Department of Justice was made early in the year. It was not related to a terrorism threat as a threat to the nation. It was related to an assessment of the security for the attorney general, given his responsibilities and the job that he undertakes. And it related to the maintenance of arms and other things by individuals who travel with the attorney general. And it was their assessment that we would be best served to use government aircraft.

These were not private chartered jet aircraft. These were aircraft of the United States government. And it was on such an aircraft that I was on my way to an event in Milwaukee on the morning of September the 11th.

you can take off your tin-foil hats now...

Ashcroft was in command during the testimony.
Ben-Veniste did not do his "attack dog" routine on him..
i think the dems have figured out that the public doesn't like these hearings turned into a political circus, and thet apear to be toning down the political rhetoric.

the glaring problem now is that Jamie Gorelick (a democrat, clinton appointee, AND MEMBER OF THE 9/11 COMMISSION) has been highlighted as a mofor reason the CIA and the FBI were not talking to eacj other!! She created the "wall" they kept talking about that prevented anyone from connecting the dots prior to 9/11. the dems have stepped into their own cowpie with the public hearings!!

Our agents were isolated by government-imposed walls, handcuffed by government-imposed restrictions and starved for basic information technology...The single greatest structural cause for the September 11th problem was the wall that segregated or separated criminal investigators and intelligence agents. Government erected this wall, government buttressed this wall and before September 11th government was blinded by this wall....In 1995, the Justice Department embraced flawed legal reasoning, imposing a series of restrictions on the FBI that went beyond what the law required. ["the wall" was written by JAMIE GORELICK!!)..

ASHCROFT: The 1995 guidelines and the procedures developed around them imposed draconian barriers, barriers between the law enforcement and intelligence communities. The wall effectively excluded prosecutors from intelligence investigations. The wall left intelligence agents afraid to talk with criminal prosecutors or agents. In 1995, the Justice Department designed a system that was destined to fail.
In the days before September 11th, the wall specifically impeded the investigation of Zacarias Moussaoui, investigation of Khalid al Mihdhar and Nawaf al Hazmi.
After the FBI arrested Moussaoui, agents became suspicious of his interest in commercial aircraft and sought approval for a criminal search warrant to search his computer. The warrant was rejected because FBI officials feared breaching the wall.

ASHCROFT: The basic architecture for the wall in the 1995 guidelines was contained in a classified memorandum entitled "Instructions for Separation of Certain Foreign Counterintelligence and Criminal Investigations."
The memorandum ordered FBI Director Louis Freeh and others, quote, "We believe that it is prudent to establish a set of instructions that will more clearly separate the counterintelligence investigation from the more limited, but continued criminal investigations.
"These procedures," the memo went on to say, "which go beyond what is legally required, will prevent any risk of creating an unwarranted appearance that FISA is being used to avoid procedural safeguards which would apply in a criminal investigation."
This memorandum laid the foundation for a wall separating the criminal and intelligence investigations, as a matter of fact, established the wall following the 1993 World Trade Center attack, which at the time was the largest international terrorism attack on American soil, the largest prior to September 11th...Full disclosure compels me to inform you that the author of this memorandum is a member of the commission [Jamie Gorelick].

By 2000, the Justice Department was so addicted to the wall it actually opposed legislation to lower the wall. Finally, the USA Patriot Act tore down this wall between our intelligence and law enforcement personnel in 2001. And when the Patriot Act was challenged, the FISA court of review upheld the law, ruling that the 1995 guidelines were required by neither the Constitution nor the law.

so basically, a bunch of Clinton lawyers created govermental barriers that prevented the dots from getting connected in regards al qaeda. the patriot act corrected the problem.
those are the unrefuted facts.

i believe the 9/11 hearings are making it abundantly clear the the Dems are not to be trusted with national security issues.
heck they want to repeal the Patriot Act which corrected the bizarre legal construct which Gorelick had created, that made it impossible to coordinate intelligence about terrorists threats. Do you rteally want these same people in charge again?



You are an elite nut job













SHUX
 

CADsortaGUY

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
25,162
1
76
www.ShawCAD.com
Originally posted by: Shuxclams
Originally posted by: heartsurgeon
Isn't he the one who stopped flying commercial during the summer of '01?
This is just baloney
BEN-VENISTE: At some point in the spring or summer of 2001, around the time of this heightened threat alert, you apparently began to use a private chartered jet plane, changing from your use of commercial aircraft on grounds, our staff is informed, of an FBI threat assessment. And, indeed, as you told us, on September 11th itself you were on a chartered jet at the time of the attack.

Can you supply the details, sir, regarding the threat which caused you to change from commercial to private leased jet?

ASHCROFT: I am very please pleased to address this issue.

BEN-VENISTE: Thank you.

ASHCROFT: Let me indicate to you that I never ceased to use commercial aircraft for my personal travel.

ASHCROFT: My wife traveled to Germany and back in August. My wife and I traveled to Washington, D.C., on the 3rd of September before the 17th -- before the 11th attack on commercial aircraft.

I have exclusively traveled on commercial aircraft for my personal travel; continued through the year 2000, through the entirety of the threat period to the nation.

The assessment made by the security team and the Department of Justice was made early in the year. It was not related to a terrorism threat as a threat to the nation. It was related to an assessment of the security for the attorney general, given his responsibilities and the job that he undertakes. And it related to the maintenance of arms and other things by individuals who travel with the attorney general. And it was their assessment that we would be best served to use government aircraft.

These were not private chartered jet aircraft. These were aircraft of the United States government. And it was on such an aircraft that I was on my way to an event in Milwaukee on the morning of September the 11th.

you can take off your tin-foil hats now...

Ashcroft was in command during the testimony.
Ben-Veniste did not do his "attack dog" routine on him..
i think the dems have figured out that the public doesn't like these hearings turned into a political circus, and thet apear to be toning down the political rhetoric.

the glaring problem now is that Jamie Gorelick (a democrat, clinton appointee, AND MEMBER OF THE 9/11 COMMISSION) has been highlighted as a mofor reason the CIA and the FBI were not talking to eacj other!! She created the "wall" they kept talking about that prevented anyone from connecting the dots prior to 9/11. the dems have stepped into their own cowpie with the public hearings!!

Our agents were isolated by government-imposed walls, handcuffed by government-imposed restrictions and starved for basic information technology...The single greatest structural cause for the September 11th problem was the wall that segregated or separated criminal investigators and intelligence agents. Government erected this wall, government buttressed this wall and before September 11th government was blinded by this wall....In 1995, the Justice Department embraced flawed legal reasoning, imposing a series of restrictions on the FBI that went beyond what the law required. ["the wall" was written by JAMIE GORELICK!!)..

ASHCROFT: The 1995 guidelines and the procedures developed around them imposed draconian barriers, barriers between the law enforcement and intelligence communities. The wall effectively excluded prosecutors from intelligence investigations. The wall left intelligence agents afraid to talk with criminal prosecutors or agents. In 1995, the Justice Department designed a system that was destined to fail.
In the days before September 11th, the wall specifically impeded the investigation of Zacarias Moussaoui, investigation of Khalid al Mihdhar and Nawaf al Hazmi.
After the FBI arrested Moussaoui, agents became suspicious of his interest in commercial aircraft and sought approval for a criminal search warrant to search his computer. The warrant was rejected because FBI officials feared breaching the wall.

ASHCROFT: The basic architecture for the wall in the 1995 guidelines was contained in a classified memorandum entitled "Instructions for Separation of Certain Foreign Counterintelligence and Criminal Investigations."
The memorandum ordered FBI Director Louis Freeh and others, quote, "We believe that it is prudent to establish a set of instructions that will more clearly separate the counterintelligence investigation from the more limited, but continued criminal investigations.
"These procedures," the memo went on to say, "which go beyond what is legally required, will prevent any risk of creating an unwarranted appearance that FISA is being used to avoid procedural safeguards which would apply in a criminal investigation."
This memorandum laid the foundation for a wall separating the criminal and intelligence investigations, as a matter of fact, established the wall following the 1993 World Trade Center attack, which at the time was the largest international terrorism attack on American soil, the largest prior to September 11th...Full disclosure compels me to inform you that the author of this memorandum is a member of the commission [Jamie Gorelick].

By 2000, the Justice Department was so addicted to the wall it actually opposed legislation to lower the wall. Finally, the USA Patriot Act tore down this wall between our intelligence and law enforcement personnel in 2001. And when the Patriot Act was challenged, the FISA court of review upheld the law, ruling that the 1995 guidelines were required by neither the Constitution nor the law.

so basically, a bunch of Clinton lawyers created govermental barriers that prevented the dots from getting connected in regards al qaeda. the patriot act corrected the problem.
those are the unrefuted facts.

i believe the 9/11 hearings are making it abundantly clear the the Dems are not to be trusted with national security issues.
heck they want to repeal the Patriot Act which corrected the bizarre legal construct which Gorelick had created, that made it impossible to coordinate intelligence about terrorists threats. Do you rteally want these same people in charge again?

You are an elite nut job

SHUX

You have a problem with HS blowing the conspiracy to bits?

CkG
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,402
8,574
126
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: Gaard
Isn't he the one who stopped flying commercial during the summer of '01?

Ayup. And how believable can he be? He lost to a dead man in his run for Senate.

the dead man's wife got the pity vote
 

MadRat

Lifer
Oct 14, 1999
11,999
307
126
Ashcroft got exposed for the smug holier-than-Christ man he wants to believe he is. Anyone that watched that back pedalling this afternoon should have been able to see his finger pointing sixteen ways to Eden. That moron actually wants people to believe that JUST BECAUSE THE ADMINISTRATION KNEW AL QUEDA WAS GOING TO HIJACK PLANES THEY DID NOT KNOW AL QUEDA WOULD USE THOSE PLANES FOR ONE-WAY SUICIDE MISSIONS. Give me a break!
 
Oct 16, 1999
10,490
4
0
This adminstration's dismissal of that PDF & other intel they had because it did not explicitly state terrorists were going to fly planes into buildings is like dismissing a stop sign after running it and getting smacked because it didn't tell you a truck was coming.
 

Chadder007

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
7,560
0
0
Originally posted by: Gonad the Barbarian
This adminstration's dismissal of that PDF & other intel they had because it did not explicitly state terrorists were going to fly planes into buildings is like dismissing a stop sign after running it and getting smacked because it didn't tell you a truck was coming.

Just to let you know.....we get THREATS EVERYDAY. We cannot act on each and every threat, even more so on threats that ARE NOT SPECIFIC!!!! :slap:
 

heartsurgeon

Diamond Member
Aug 18, 2001
4,260
0
0
You are an elite nut job
I am flattered that you consider me elite.
That moron actually wants people to believe that JUST BECAUSE THE ADMINISTRATION KNEW AL QUEDA WAS GOING TO HIJACK PLANES THEY DID NOT KNOW AL QUEDA WOULD USE THOSE PLANES FOR ONE-WAY SUICIDE MISSIONS. Give me a break!
I assume you mean the Clinton administration, as the PDB memo clearly states, the interest in airplanes ("in 1998 saying that Bin Laden wanted to hijack a U.S. aircraft ") dates back to the clinton administration
This adminstration's dismissal of that PDF & other intel they had because it did not explicitly state terrorists were going to fly planes into buildings is like dismissing a stop sign after running it and getting smacked because it didn't tell you a truck was coming.
Lets see, which one of the 600,000,000 people/year that fly on airplanes are you going to stop and question (remember, no "racial profiling" courtesy of the Dems), which one of the 6,000,000 scheduled air flights/year are you going to stop and search? Oh yes, and what did Clinton do about this, after all, this info came out in 1998!!

you liberals are blind to what the PDB memo actually says!!

the name of this thread should be "Dems on 9/11 commission try to blame Govenor Bush for not responding to terrorist threat during Clinton presidency"

read the darn memo for heaven's sake and stop relying on the liberal talking heads to give you the Cliff Notes version of the facts.
 

burnedout

Diamond Member
Oct 12, 1999
6,249
2
0
Originally posted by: Jmman
As crappy as people think Ashcroft is, just take a look at the testimony of the former attorney general, Janet Reno. Ashcroft might not be that great, but he is freakin Einstein compared to Reno.....:)
Heh, no doubt. Old Janet "burn down the church" Reno never was much for words - or even actions, for that matter.
 
Jan 12, 2003
3,498
0
0
Originally posted by: burnedout
Originally posted by: Jmman
As crappy as people think Ashcroft is, just take a look at the testimony of the former attorney general, Janet Reno. Ashcroft might not be that great, but he is freakin Einstein compared to Reno.....:)
Heh, no doubt. Old Janet "burn down the church" Reno never was much for words - or even actions, for that matter.

Huh? She is a woman of action...was shamming from PT @ FT. Hood when I saw the tanks bust into the side of the compound and killed all the little innocent children inside.
 
Oct 16, 1999
10,490
4
0
Originally posted by: Chadder007
Originally posted by: Gonad the Barbarian
This adminstration's dismissal of that PDF & other intel they had because it did not explicitly state terrorists were going to fly planes into buildings is like dismissing a stop sign after running it and getting smacked because it didn't tell you a truck was coming.

Just to let you know.....we get THREATS EVERYDAY. We cannot act on each and every threat, even more so on threats that ARE NOT SPECIFIC!!!! :slap:

I didn't say anything about threats, I said intel - our own assessment of those threats, which by all accounts indicated more attempts were coming. And saying it was not specific enough is assinine. If you knew someone was out to get you would you wait for them to name the time and place and method before you did anything about it? They knew something was likely coming and they officially pulled Ashcroft (and I suspect others unnoficially) off of commercial flights in response to it. To my knowlege that is the only action the Bush administration took in response to the threat of terrorism before 9-11.
 

heartsurgeon

Diamond Member
Aug 18, 2001
4,260
0
0
He [ashcroft] surprised the commission by introducing a 1995 memo ? declassified by the Justice Department two days earlier ? that was written by one of the commission's Democratic members, Jamie S. Gorelick, when she was the deputy to Ms. Reno.

The memo, Mr. Ashcroft said, put in place the wall that had a "debilitating impact" on the ability of counterterrorism investigators to share information with their counterparts in criminal investigations. "Full disclosure compels me to inform you that its author is a member of this commission," he said, looking warily toward Ms. Gorelick. Commission officials said they had never seen the memo before.

Ms. Gorelick declined to comment on the issue after the hearing. "I don't really want to be a witness here," she said.

owned!

The 1995 memo by then Deputy Attorney General Jamie S. Gorelick - now a member of the 9/11 commission - explains that the new rules dictated by the Clinton administration to separate criminal investigations from intelligence gathering "go beyond what is legally required." The Gorelick rules were meant to ensure that "no 'proactive' investigative efforts or technical coverages" of terrorist suspects be carried out on U.S. soil.

The result of the 1995 Gorelick rules, Ashcroft said, were devastating, and hampered the ability of U.S. intelligence agencies to communicate the identify of two of the 9/11 hijackers to law-enforcement agencies, even after they had entered the United States. That failure specifically contributed to 9/11.
 

fjord

Senior member
Feb 18, 2004
667
0
0
An even bigger surprise was that Ashcroft was not circulated the Aug 6, 2001 PDB memo.

Apparently he is excluded on PDB's.

Pickard's is well supported by the documentary evidence. He and his anti-terrorism agenda was not welcomed by Ashcroft.

Ashcroft's top 5 points--did not include anti-terrorism.