Are you under the impression that this is a novel thought?
Don't worry, man, we'll all become engineers, managers, and those "high class" jobs.
how? it will soon take one person to operate all of it. Are you forgeting AI?
??? People on the TV keep telling me that getting rid of low-wage jobs will free everyone to be high-wage workers???
??? People on the TV keep telling me that getting rid of low-wage jobs will free everyone to be high-wage workers???
Probably not the thread for anything serious, but when I started surveying, three man crews were standard, and before that it was five man crews. It then went to two man crews, and now I work by myself with a robot.
It used to be someone without experience could get into the business, and learn as they went, leading to a job that paid decent, but not exceptional money. Those days are about over. Now you have to go to school, exit knowing half what you should know, and hope you get an entry level job, and hope you like it enough to stay until you make ok money.
Technology can't be stopped, and it shouldn't be stopped, but it isn't all sunshine and lollipops.
Example: long wall minerwhat do you mean?
how? it will soon take one person to operate all of it. Are you forgeting AI?
Don't worry, man, we'll all become engineers, managers, and those "high class" jobs.
The correct solution to the problem of "abundance" is a higher minimum wage and/or a cap on a full time work week at 24 or 16 hrs. We are able to produce plenty (all?) of the output we need without employing 250+ million people for forty hours a week.
Only by using every available resource (if only to keep someone else from using it) can our maximum profit be reached long enough for the current robber barons to "get theirs."
Good description and pretty much happening right in front of our eyes.
You know working in the tech sector won't actually shield you from it right?
You know working in the tech sector won't actually shield you from it right?