• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Artificial Gravity

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: Woodchuck2000
Originally posted by: Mrpilot007
I'm surprised no one has defined gravity for this discussion:

(physics) the force of attraction between all masses in the universe;

especially the attraction of the earth's mass for bodies near its surface;

"the more remote the body the less the gravity";

"the gravitation between two bodies is proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them";

"gravitation cannot be held responsible for people falling in love"--Albert Einstein
Not strictly true - gravity can also affect particles with zero mass. The sun causes a measurable deflection in the light passing nearby from distant stars. Photons are expected by most physicists to have zero mass (zero non-rest mass) and therefore they shouldn't be affected if we use that definition of gravity.
"We also knew that photons are affected by gravitational fields not because photons have mass, but because gravitational fields (in particular, strong gravitational fields) change the shape of space-time."
http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/ask_astro/answers/961102.html
 
"We also knew that photons are affected by gravitational fields not because photons have mass, but because gravitational fields (in particular, strong gravitational fields) change the shape of space-time."

isnt that still being debated ? spacetime n the like ?
 
Originally posted by: the splat in the hat
"We also knew that photons are affected by gravitational fields not because photons have mass, but because gravitational fields (in particular, strong gravitational fields) change the shape of space-time."

isnt that still being debated ? spacetime n the like ?

Not really. According to Einstein's theory, light from a distant star would be bent slightly as it passed by our Sun, although the bending would be very slight; somewhere around 1 thousandth of a degree, (weird, I just read this earlier today somewhere), which is like seeing something a mile away move an inch.

Following Einstein's prediction, this has been observed and measured to a great deal of precision. The results are in agreement with Einstein's prediction.
 
Back
Top