soulcougher73
Lifer
- Nov 29, 2006
- 15,908
- 4,486
- 136
My friend was watching Lord of the rings with his ex girlfriend. About half way through the film she asks "Is this based on a true story?"
Back to the freaking future man.
I'm assuming that the wife's issue is with unexplained/sudden jumping to different time periods. Watchmen jumps around a ton as characters detail various aspects of their past including their dealings with The Comedian. Back to the Future may travel to different time periods in a movie, but you know where they're going and there's enough exposition in the movie to explain any differences (mostly in regard to Back to the Future Part II).
Watchmen is pretty straight forward.
If by straight-forward you mean it doesn't jump around a lot between characters and time periods, then I'm pretty sure that's not correct. Hell, Dr. Manhattan's story on Mars is a chronology of all the major decisions in his life that he believes lead to his deatomization and subsequent formation into his current state. Although, I thought the movie screwed up the wording quite a bit. :|
Now, I didn't find the movie hard to follow at all, but to be fair, I also read the graphic novel.
New wife is the obivous answer.
can not handle movies that are not in chronological order or ones that jump around to different times. asks so many questions!
Once Upon A Time in America
Watchmen
Batman Begins
ugh
My friend was watching Lord of the rings with his ex girlfriend. About half way through the film she asks "Is this based on a true story?"
If by straight-forward you mean it doesn't jump around a lot between characters and time periods, then I'm pretty sure that's not correct. Hell, Dr. Manhattan's story on Mars is a chronology of all the major decisions in his life that he believes lead to his deatomization and subsequent formation into his current state. Although, I thought the movie screwed up the wording quite a bit. :|
Now, I didn't find the movie hard to follow at all, but to be fair, I also read the graphic novel.
There were a lot of self-contained flashbacks, but overall it was a rather linear narrative that, at least, was rather straightforward.
Sure, if someone has problems distinguishing flashbacks (obvious differences in style-time period, sometimes glossiness, etc), then it would be a problem.
Remember what the OP said: "can not handle movies that are not in chronological order or ones that jump around to different times."![]()
Watch Primer
This. Nothing compares to it.
Next on my list.Run Lola Run
Pulp Fiction, well, you know--starts at the end and continues to jump forward and backwards a few times, ends near the end of the 2nd act (Bruce Willis riding away on the chopper), and then the film closes near the beginning of the story....iirc.
