TastesLikeChicken
Lifer
- Sep 12, 2004
- 16,852
- 59
- 86
That was exactly what the US political machine believed prior to WW2.Originally posted by: BBond
Originally posted by: Starbuck1975
People are not aware of what is really going on over in Iraq. The situation in country is not quite what it seems like on the news. Many of our young military do not want to go back, but they are afraid to stand up and fight. Though I think the military is great and has been good to me for the past 20+ years, at times like this it can be very harsh and run over you like a train.
While this is all certainly true, the Gulf War did create the misconception that our technological advantage would enable American forces to win quick decisive victories with minimal casualties and be home safe in a matter of months...what is going on in Iraq now is what warfare has always been...long, drawn out, brutal and intense.
Talk to any WW2 or Vietnam vets if you can find any, and their stories are consistent with what we are hearing from Iraq...that we won WW2 does not change the nature of warfare, and many of our troops who fought in Europe and the Pacific witnessed things equivalent in brutality and chaos to what is going on in Iraq today.
Please note that this post is independent of any justification or support for the war in Iraq...simply some comments on the nature of warfare and our society's understanding of it.
Those are the reasons why war should be waged only as a last resort.
An earlier US entry into WW2 would have saved considerable lives, both US and foreign. How many more men died waiting for that last resort instead?
