GullyFoyle
Diamond Member
- Dec 13, 2000
- 4,362
- 11
- 81
Originally posted by: Sylvanas
Originally posted by: spittledip
Sorry Coldkilla. I am not interested in "real" FPSs. I am only interested in having fun.
QFT. Looks pretty boring to me.
Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: Coldkilla
Like Call of Duty 4, Counter Strike, Unreal Tournament? Sorry this game isn't for you ether.
Wow, I guess I won't bother checking it out then.Seems like with CoD4 being one of the best selling PC games of all time, there aren't going to be many people left to play this.
Originally posted by: DanDeighan
If you don't mind my asking, how does ARMA compare to the Project Reality mod for BF2?
Originally posted by: minmaster
it can be up to 10000 players in a single game, but only a few people will be online playing this game...
Originally posted by: Canai
Originally posted by: minmaster
it can be up to 10000 players in a single game, but only a few people will be online playing this game...
? WTF are you talking about?
Originally posted by: Coldkilla
Just because more popular servers have 30-40 people on them during the day... doesn't make it a bad game... it just means the public just turns towards insanely retarded crap... The 10 second repetitive crap: shoot, die, respawn, repeat. Not saying these players are retarded as Im sure a bunch of them do play other games that require even just a little bit of thinking.
Originally posted by: Coldkilla
Originally posted by: DanDeighan
If you don't mind my asking, how does ARMA compare to the Project Reality mod for BF2?
-10x larger battlefields.
-Better ballistics on all the weapons
-10,000 meter view distance
-Better aviation controls
-Get shot once in the leg and your down unless you have a medic near you.
--No magic health kits to fix you up.
-It has a mission editor.
-Up to 128 players in a single game.
-No matter what, the BF2 engine doesn't stop that arcade feeling.
Originally posted by: Inspector Jihad
Originally posted by: Coldkilla
Just because more popular servers have 30-40 people on them during the day... doesn't make it a bad game... it just means the public just turns towards insanely retarded crap... The 10 second repetitive crap: shoot, die, respawn, repeat. Not saying these players are retarded as Im sure a bunch of them do play other games that require even just a little bit of thinking.
lol, you're a massive tool.
Originally posted by: TehMac
Originally posted by: Inspector Jihad
Originally posted by: Coldkilla
Just because more popular servers have 30-40 people on them during the day... doesn't make it a bad game... it just means the public just turns towards insanely retarded crap... The 10 second repetitive crap: shoot, die, respawn, repeat. Not saying these players are retarded as Im sure a bunch of them do play other games that require even just a little bit of thinking.
lol, you're a massive tool.
No, I can understand his frustration. There is quite a bit of sense to what he says and therein lies the problem; most people, myself included, would have loved to love ARMA, it was a cool looking game, in terms of gameplay, realism had been amped up from anything previously played, etc.
HOWEVER, it was buggy, glitchy, slow, didn't look all that great, and I didn't even know how to control the dude. If it can't even follow control protocols of a normal FPS, then for me, there's no incentive to learn, especially when the rest of it looks like crap.
Originally posted by: BTRY B 529th FA BN
Can someone tell me where I can get this? a link possibly?
Originally posted by: BTRY B 529th FA BN
Can someone tell me where I can get this? a link possibly?
Originally posted by: Imp
And I don't really get all this "real FPS" anymore. Is there something less real out there or am I suppose to believe that jerky mouse control and throttled movement speed is suppose to represent the effect of humping 10 miles, then shooting stuff in real life.
Originally posted by: BladeVenom
ARMA 2 isn't out yet, and last I heard it was going to be delayed to 2009.
Originally posted by: destrekor
Originally posted by: skyofavalon
Arma 1 was terrible.I wanted to like it. Nothing comes close to Battlefield 2. Battlefield 3 is the only game on the horizon that matters.
Well I won't be subscribing to your newsletter. Battlefield 2 is a big pile of meh. It's not horrible, but it's FAR from the best FPS on PC, that's for sure. And because of that, I haven't paid the least bit of attention to Battlefield 3 news. I'll let it surprise me if its good, or it'll just pass along like it never mattered. Better than having all hype killed like with Battlefield 2.
Originally posted by: DanDeighan
Well, lets see... Game-Monitor.com 600 people playing it right now.
