• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Are you pro- or anti-Bush? What about pro- or anti-gun?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Anti-Bush
Anti-Cheney
Ant-Bush's Cabinet
Pro-Gun
Anti-Conservative
Anti-Affirmative Action
Pro-Abortion
Anti-Death Penalty
Anti-Censorship of swear words
Pro-Censorship of nudity
 
I don't want a gun myself, but I don't give a fvck if someone else buys one or not. Does it make me anti-gun, pro-gun, or neutral?
Oh, and I am definitely anti-Bush. Aside from a relatively successful Afghanistan campaign, this guy is a disaster in every area. To pump 450 Billion a year into the economy and get no recovery is just plain pathetic.
 
Originally posted by: ScottyB
Anti-Bush
Anti-Cheney
Ant-Bush's Cabinet
Pro-Gun
Anti-Conservative
Anti-Affirmative Action
Pro-Abortion
Anti-Death Penalty
Anti-Censorship of swear words
Pro-Censorship of nudity


Ok, I can understand all your views except the last one, are you telling me you'd like to ban nudity. Granted some people shouldn't be naked, but still. I don't get it.

KK
 
Originally posted by: BoberFett


Sort of a catch 22, wouldn't you say?

of course it is... the logic that drives us is illogical. so, we will depend on elections even if we have no faith in them.

(let us all take a moment of silence to praise joseph heller for coining this fantastic phrase)
 
Originally posted by: sward666
I would be more curious to see how many of the "up-in-arms-over-the-Patriot Act" people would happily sign away their (and my) 2nd Amendment rights.

It Depends if you think the meaning of the second amendment means in Sanctioned state militias to protect against the federal government or the right for some guy in Nebraska to create a white supremacist para-military group with assault weapons waiting to go on a killing spree. But it could be either one. I am not trying to say that all gun owners are white supremacist hicks nor am i implying that too anyone from nebraska. But i wonder what would happen if people stopped buying guns and the gun industry's only buying the was state and federal government. Would crime decrease in 20 years if the supply of guns washed away? interesting debate.


[Edit]
I wonder if the vote has changed at all since everything that has happened since.
 
Originally posted by: mosco
Originally posted by: sward666
I would be more curious to see how many of the "up-in-arms-over-the-Patriot Act" people would happily sign away their (and my) 2nd Amendment rights.

It Depends if you think the meaning of the second amendment means in Sanctioned state militias to protect against the federal government or the right for some guy in Nebraska to create a white supremacist para-military group with assault weapons waiting to go on a killing spree. But it could be either one. I am not trying to say that all gun owners are white supremacist hicks nor am i implying that too anyone from nebraska. But i wonder what would happen if people stopped buying guns and the gun industry's only buying the was state and federal government. Would crime decrease in 20 years if the supply of guns washed away? interesting debate.


[Edit]
I wonder if the vote has changed at all since everything that has happened since.

Some of the results of Austraila's gun control
 
Originally posted by: BoberFett

There are many here who think the country is going to hell because Bush stole the presidency. If this is so, how are you going to take the country back and put it in the hands of good people? An election? You can't have any faith in elections, because we've now seen that an election can be hijacked.

Wow... Gore quit bitching about this a long time ago, but apparantly some people will never give up.
rolleye.gif


Pro-gun, Republican, would have prefered to vote for either McCain or Bradley rather than Bush or Gore... I don't object to Bush, I know he's not responsible for the situation we're in (economically), but I think he used irrational fear to sell uninformed people on an unnecessary war. I'll see who's running against him before I decide who to vote for... If it's "The Reverend" Al Sharpton, Bush has my vote for sure. 🙂
 
I'm not from your country so I have no real say in what goes on in your elections. Still, I think Bush is a total psychopath who stole an election and delcared war on a country in order to impress his daddy. Not that that counts for jack, of course 😉

On the anti-gun issue... well, it wasn't me who said it best
Even if you had no weapons at all. Where do you think Kung Fu came from? Ancient Chinese people without weapons trying to figure out just the right way to bounce a rice patty off someone's skull so it'd shatter their spinal column.
-- 2, the Ranting Gryphen
For the full rant, gohere. Curbing the guns does nothing, history and studies have shown that many, MANY times. Canada has like a fraction of the US's gun murders, yet quite comparable knife murders. That's right, we like to make it up close and personal when we kill you here.

Anyway, rock on.

-- Jack
 
Originally posted by: KK
Originally posted by: ScottyB
Anti-Bush
Anti-Cheney
Ant-Bush's Cabinet
Pro-Gun
Anti-Conservative
Anti-Affirmative Action
Pro-Abortion
Anti-Death Penalty
Anti-Censorship of swear words
Pro-Censorship of nudity


Ok, I can understand all your views except the last one, are you telling me you'd like to ban nudity. Granted some people shouldn't be naked, but still. I don't get it.

KK

On broadcast tv.
 
Originally posted by: Wuffsunie
I'm not from your country so I have no real say in what goes on in your elections. Still, I think Bush is a total psychopath who stole an election and delcared war on a country in order to impress his daddy. Not that that counts for jack, of course 😉

On the anti-gun issue... well, it wasn't me who said it best
Even if you had no weapons at all. Where do you think Kung Fu came from? Ancient Chinese people without weapons trying to figure out just the right way to bounce a rice patty off someone's skull so it'd shatter their spinal column.
-- 2, the Ranting Gryphen
For the full rant, gohere. Curbing the guns does nothing, history and studies have shown that many, MANY times. Canada has like a fraction of the US's gun murders, yet quite comparable knife murders. That's right, we like to make it up close and personal when we kill you here.

Anyway, rock on.

-- Jack

While i didn't it would work. I do think that kung Fu is a little different, atleast you can defend yourself with harming somebody that badly. Even the gun, the least you could do is shoot someone in the leg or something.

I mean, a guy walks into a bank and says, if you don't give me the money, i will kung Fu you, i would like to see them try that. Drive by kung Fuing? its a little different.
 
Originally posted by: ScottyB
Originally posted by: KK
Originally posted by: ScottyB
Anti-Bush
Anti-Cheney
Ant-Bush's Cabinet
Pro-Gun
Anti-Conservative
Anti-Affirmative Action
Pro-Abortion
Anti-Death Penalty
Anti-Censorship of swear words
Pro-Censorship of nudity


Ok, I can understand all your views except the last one, are you telling me you'd like to ban nudity. Granted some people shouldn't be naked, but still. I don't get it.

KK

On broadcast tv.

I don't think i would have a problem with nudity. Don't they have that in Europe? hardCore porn, i might not want my kids to see that.
 
Originally posted by: Wuffsunie
I'm not from your country so I have no real say in what goes on in your elections. Still, I think Bush is a total psychopath who stole an election and delcared war on a country in order to impress his daddy. Not that that counts for jack, of course 😉
-- Jack

Read up on our Electoral College system and you'll understand why Bush did not steal any election.
 
Originally posted by: Feldenak
Read up on our Electoral College system and you'll understand why Bush did not steal any election.
Many of the stolen election comments come from other places then the popular vote count.

Oh and btw, I like how you say people should read up on the electoral college when you have a link in your sig that says how many counties Bush won as if that has any bearing on anything.
 
Originally posted by: DanJ
Originally posted by: Feldenak
Read up on our Electoral College system and you'll understand why Bush did not steal any election.
Many of the stolen election comments come from other places then the popular vote count.

Oh and btw, I like how you say people should read up on the electoral college when you have a link in your sig that says how many counties Bush won as if that has any bearing on anything.

It makes it easier for some of the simpletons around here to understand the results.
 
Originally posted by: Feldenak
It makes it easier for some of the simpletons around here to understand the results.
I'd say its your way of making the results look to be in your favor. Just as it would for me if I had a graph of every voter in the U.S. and each one was blue or red.

Thusly, we'd both be using graphs that mean absolutely nothing in the overall scheme of things.
 
Originally posted by: Feldenak
Originally posted by: Wuffsunie
I'm not from your country so I have no real say in what goes on in your elections. Still, I think Bush is a total psychopath who stole an election and delcared war on a country in order to impress his daddy. Not that that counts for jack, of course 😉
-- Jack

Read up on our Electoral College system and you'll understand why Bush did not steal any election.

Yeah, i am pretty sure it has to do with the counting votes thing, not the popular vote vs electoral college.


Do you think the electoral college is a good thing btw?
 
Originally posted by: mosco
Originally posted by: sward666
I would be more curious to see how many of the "up-in-arms-over-the-Patriot Act" people would happily sign away their (and my) 2nd Amendment rights.

It Depends if you think the meaning of the second amendment means in Sanctioned state militias to protect against the federal government or the right for some guy in Nebraska to create a white supremacist para-military group with assault weapons waiting to go on a killing spree. But it could be either one. I am not trying to say that all gun owners are white supremacist hicks nor am i implying that too anyone from nebraska. But i wonder what would happen if people stopped buying guns and the gun industry's only buying the was state and federal government. Would crime decrease in 20 years if the supply of guns washed away? interesting debate.


[Edit]
I wonder if the vote has changed at all since everything that has happened since.

The federal government has tried to stop the gun producers from making both ammo for the public and some guns for the public. Seeing as how the feds buy from the same people, the gun makers said "ok, if you want us to stop producing the ammo for the people, we will also stop producing for you." The federal government has its hands tied, which IMHO, is a good thing.
 
Anti bush and bush is anti-gun .
... Your facts are screwy.

BTW- The Nazi right and Commi left both don't allow gun ownership.
 
Back
Top