Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: sandigga
Originally posted by: Amused
I don't believe anybody should be forced to have something biologically attached and dependent on their bodies against their will.
If I stitched Richard Simmons to any one of you guys, and to remove him would kill him, I don't think a single one of you would give it a second thought.
against their will?? only if she was raped... its all about responsibility she chose to have sex.... she should know the risks of doing so.. I'm pro life but there are exceptions.. such as rape and if the mother's life is in danger....
What are you? The sex police who will ensure that women pay for their irresponsibility?
She doesn't WANT a baby. To force her to keep a child to term is just that, against her will. Humans have not had sex solely for procreation for all of recorded history. I don't expect them to start now.
It's her body, her responsibility, her choice. I have a hell of a lot more respect for a woman who makes a mistake, knows she cannot afford to raise the child, knows that having the child will keep her from making more of herself and aborts than I have for a woman that keeps the kid and lives off the public tit.
So, she made a mistake... Why compound it and end up with another welfare queen with another unwanted, neglected child?