PrinceofWands
Lifer
- May 16, 2000
- 13,522
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: duragezic
Yeah I really wish the idiot with the huge post would be banned and moreso the genius who had to quote the whole thing just to write a useless response.
As to the people who say the wouldn't aim to kill, I've read that you are setting yourself up for lawsuits if you just injure them (especially something like a kneecap I'd imagine). Nothing like that ever came to you Nebor? I think its absolute bs that you can't injure them without worrying about a lawsuit from a scumbag criminal. But I dont know the whole truth to that.
If I wasn't in the middle of finals prep I might have time to make a condensed version, without duplicity...but I am, so it's the best I can do.
The general argument used is that if you aren't shooting to kill then you didn't feel your life was in jeaporday, and if it wasn't then you had no right to bring a gun into play. It can, and has, resulted in successful lawsuits against the shooter, but not every time I'm sure.
