• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Are you buying a HD 7970 on Monday the 9th?

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Are you buying an HD 7970 on Monday the 9th?

  • Yes

  • No


Results are only viewable after voting.
Two 6950's in CF put the beating on two 6970's at times. But we are talking bout dual gpu performances. Now thats another turd in the drinking water. Did Amd sort out the load balancing? The two gpus trying to sync with each other. Previous cards it was responsible for stuttering issues. Even Nvidia had the same problem. PCI-E is updated cards are updated but are the way sli and CF goes about updated?
 
I think the 7950 is going to be ~10% faster overall than the 580. I can't see it being more than about 15% slower than the 7970. The 7870 should fall in close to 580 performance.

Well, I guess we can guess for a while just how they will all compare to the 580 :\.

The thing though is that AMD's lineup is so full of cards over the $300 price point that I just don't see the 580 being a good buy the moment these cards go on sale. There's just not a lot of room for a card whose only advantage at that point would be to be a good value. With the same price and performance, a 78x0 would be a better buy simply because it's less power hungry.
 
Extremely impressive numbers so far in this poll, 33 people buying a 7970 in a few days. Wow, hopefully they have better stock quantities than they did at the 5870 launch, because demand looks very high for this card.
 
Extremely impressive numbers so far in this poll, 33 people buying a 7970 in a few days. Wow, hopefully they have better stock quantities than they did at the 5870 launch, because demand looks very high for this card.

The numbers actually surprise me that more people aren't buying one. I thought they'd be reversed
 
I never understood the big fuss about unlocking Radeon 6950 cards. It's a paltry 3-5% gain in performance, it's so small it's imperceptible.

Do you literally mean just unlocking the shaders and not upping the clocks on core/mem? A 6950 is just a manufacturer-gimped 6970 so upping the clocks is second nature. Upping voltage is optional (but recommended for anything higher than ~880 core imo). Furmark shows a stock 6950 at 88fps and a shader-unlocked 6950 @ 6970 clocks is pumping out 115fps. That's a wee bit more than 3-5%, more like 31%.

http://www.techpowerup.com/articles/overclocking/vidcard/159
 
I am waiting for the best product @ $200 once both AMD and nVidia have released cards at that price.

If neither of the companies offer a decent product at that price, I will be waiting.
 
At 100 participants, we see a 35% rate of expected purchase. That's pretty impressive for a single SKU of a whole new line of cards.
 
Do you literally mean just unlocking the shaders and not upping the clocks on core/mem? A 6950 is just a manufacturer-gimped 6970 so upping the clocks is second nature. Upping voltage is optional (but recommended for anything higher than ~880 core imo). Furmark shows a stock 6950 at 88fps and a shader-unlocked 6950 @ 6970 clocks is pumping out 115fps. That's a wee bit more than 3-5%, more like 31%.

http://www.techpowerup.com/articles/overclocking/vidcard/159

I said nothing about overclocking, only unlocking disabled cores. And show me one real-world test where 6970 is 31% faster than 6950. Even theoretical shader performance differs by only 20% so in real world it's usually much less, more like 10-15%.
 
No thanks. It barely beats the 580 in the game I am spending most of my time playing. (BF3)

It barely beats a gtx580 when the person running the benchmark is catering to nvidia cards by running MSAA.

When MSAA is off it's a different story, and I'm sure you're thinking that MSAA improves image quality so it should be on. The thing is that MSAA is useless in games that use deferred rendering and FXAA/MLAA are much better options for removing jagged edges.

Also expect driver maturity to change how the 7970 performs in bf3 and other games.
 
It barely beats a gtx580 when the person running the benchmark is catering to nvidia cards by running MSAA.

When MSAA is off it's a different story, and I'm sure you're thinking that MSAA improves image quality so it should be on. The thing is that MSAA is useless in games that use deferred rendering and FXAA/MLAA are much better options for removing jagged edges.

Also expect driver maturity to change how the 7970 performs in bf3 and other games.

Well then anyone in their right mind would wait for "driver maturity" to actually happen until purchasing it. You don't pay early adopter tax, and you get the performance you are supposed to right out of the box.

As far as benchmarking preferences.....I don't buy it.
 
It barely beats a gtx580 when the person running the benchmark is catering to nvidia cards by running MSAA.

When MSAA is off it's a different story, and I'm sure you're thinking that MSAA improves image quality so it should be on. The thing is that MSAA is useless in games that use deferred rendering and FXAA/MLAA are much better options for removing jagged edges.

Also expect driver maturity to change how the 7970 performs in bf3 and other games.

1. Last I heard AMD did better on MSAA then nVidia not the other way around.
2. FXAA/MLAA are just blur filters and cannot even come close to MSAA. (Or preferably CSAA+TrAA; which literally take changing one line of code to use over MSAA and provide far better quality and performance)
 
Last edited:
No thanks. It barely beats the 580 in the game I am spending most of my time playing. (BF3)

OC%20BF3.png


and the 7970 has much more oc headroom than that.
 
OCGuy is the worst kind of Nvidia fanboy


Personal Attacks are not acceptable in VC&G.

Please take some time to familiarize yourself with the following portions of the AnandTech Forum Guidelines:
1) No trolling, flaming or personally attacking members. Deftly attacking ideas and backing up arguments with facts is acceptable and encouraged. Attacking other members personally and purposefully causing trouble with no motive other than to upset the crowd is not allowed.
We want to give all our members as much freedom as possible while maintaining an environment that encourages productive discussion. It is our desire to encourage our members to share their knowledge and experiences in order to benefit the rest of the community, while also providing a place for people to come and just hang out.

We also intend to encourage respect and responsibility among members in order to maintain order and civility. Our social forums will have a relaxed atmosphere, but other forums will be expected to remain on-topic and posts should be helpful, relevant and professional.

We ask for respect and common decency towards your fellow forum members.
Administrator Idontcare
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top