Are we there yet? Anybody still in doubt that a Trump Presidency is a national disaster?

Page 9 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

SP33Demon

Lifer
Jun 22, 2001
27,928
142
106
I'm going to keep defending this wonderful thread because you were rude and didn't ask me nicely. I googled Trump because I don't follow the media and discovered an almost universal shit show. So please come back and post when you get to yes on if you're there yet. Your impaired brain will hold you back but the signs are already strong that it's not looking good. Are we there yet?
More self hate driven by a man who still won't be prez for 60 more days. If you look deep inside and reflect on the reasons you hate Trump, then it will reveal what you hate about yourself. Only until you admit these flaws can you really be free to live your life. Creating threads out of discontent will not cure this cancer inside your psyche. Only after admission that you are self-projecting hopelessness about how you feel your life is going - and the hope that a Trump admin will mirror such hopelessness - can you remove all discontent. I am only trying to help you realize what you probably already know but are in denial about. Someone else putting it in writing should make it more real for you.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,725
6,754
126
More self hate driven by a man who still won't be prez for 60 more days. If you look deep inside and reflect on the reasons you hate Trump, then it will reveal what you hate about yourself. Only until you admit these flaws can you really be free to live your life. Creating threads out of discontent will not cure this cancer inside your psyche. Only after admission that you are self-projecting hopelessness about how you feel your life is going - and the hope that a Trump admin will mirror such hopelessness - can you remove all discontent. I am only trying to help you realize what you probably already know but are in denial about. Someone else putting it in writing should make it more real for you.
Oh Boy, do I smell fear. It's you who hates Trump, not me. I love him. He, along with a Republican Senate and House are about to become the biggest fuckups In modern history. They are about to drive a stake thought the heart of the Republican party. I can understand why you're pissing in your pants. By the time they're done I figure it will be progressives in power for a thousand years. Are we there yet?
 
Nov 25, 2013
32,083
11,718
136
Q A 9 word tweet isn't comparable to the crap you've written about it.

“He [Obama] lost the popular vote by a lot and won the election. We should have a revolution in this country!” (Nov. 6) [2012]

“The phoney [sic] electoral college made a laughing stock out of our nation. The loser one!” (Nov. 6) [2012]

“More votes equals a loss…revolution!” (Nov. 7) [2012]


We can't let this happen. We should march on Washington and stop this travesty. Our nation is totally divided!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 7, 2012

Lets fight like hell and stop this great and disgusting injustice! The world is laughing at us.
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 7, 2012

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...he-electoral-college-from-disaster-to-genius/

 

agent00f

Lifer
Jun 9, 2016
12,203
1,243
86
Personally, I do not believe that the example of Nigerian princes has much to do with liberal blindness nor do I believe that there is some automatic bias in liberals that makes them think people are good.
There's a bias, ie empathy, in everyone to think others are like us. In fact we're often naturally disturbed by people not like us.

I think the difference between liberals and conservatives is that liberals are more capable of not allowing their emotions to bias their judgment as to what is real. This is followed up by a corollary assumption that people, conservatives more typically, who can't do this are stupid. I call this the liberal brain defect because it isn't stupidity that creates truth deniers, but an avoidance of the clash between reality and mentally comforting beliefs that makes conservatives, more generally conservatives, appear to be stupid. In short they are not stupid, just unwilling to abandon beliefs that are comforting for their egos.

I think your observations are decent up to this point, but let's put in the context of said empathy. If a person measures himself through skill at figuring things out and getting them right, he will naturally assume someone else is trying to do the same thing, and their failure at it is a reflection of lack of skill acquisition, or iow "stupidity".

That assumption is the basis of what you're calling "brain defect", and this is where you'll need to ponder further: this is also at the root of that defect conservatives have. To wit, when a conservative reads breitbart and posts that garbage, he thinks that's the same thing as liberals, posting from their liberal media.

You're largely right/astute that for whatever reason different people do seem to think about the world differently, but their communication flaws in this case both manifest because they each assume the other is just like them.

I believe also that the ego is our psychic defense against negative feelings we have no conscious knowledge that we have, that we are egotistical because we actually feel bad. This feeling was inculcated in childhood by being verbally put down. We were made to conform and we had to to survive. When I say that all people are good, I do not mean they act that way. I mean they act like shit because that is how they feel and they feel that way because they were made to believe in lies.

You seem to take the notion that because I know there is nothing really wrong with people that I would foolishly trust them or turn my back on the insane.
Do you similarly psychoanalyze animals whom you've seen kill when it's in their self interest? Is the cat that's loyal to you but hunts smaller animals for food good or bad?

Think carefully about how these word are being used. I just said they seem to lack virtues like intellectual honesty, deference, or learned empathy for others not exactly like them. When people of that nature act in their self-interest, civilization is poorer for it, just as life was before those virtues were widespread.

So there is something wrong with how liberals deal with conservatives, the make fools of themselves calling them stupid while conservatives march right on viciously determined to destroy anything that makes them feel bad. You seem to want to take them head on without understanding they wouldn't be the way they are if they didn't believe in the false fact that they are worthless. I am simply saying there is a truth that we are all deeply damaged and that it is that damage that makes of violent and that when you actually feel how bad you feel it can set you free. But you can't do that for anybody else. You can only do it for yourself. The division of the self against the self can only be ended by self unification and the tools to do that are not political but psychological. The greater the self understanding the greater the compassion for others. Compassion is wisdom and wisdom is not blind trust or naivety.

So what you should do, here or by creating your own thread, is to lay out how liberals should address the conservative in your opinion. Where do you want to take this notion that we are dealing with an implacable evil force, or would you put it that way?

Many children before learn these and other virtues are often cruel and destructive. Sometime their behavior is best modified by kindness/carrots, and if that doesn't work then more strict means. I mean, you've already more or less admitted they're not the sort to learn things through intellectual methods, so explaining right or wrong to them certainly isn't going to work, per you own understanding of defects above.
 

agent00f

Lifer
Jun 9, 2016
12,203
1,243
86
Oh Boy, do I smell fear. It's you who hates Trump, not me. I love him. He, along with a Republican Senate and House are about to become the biggest fuckups In modern history. They are about to drive a stake thought the heart of the Republican party. I can understand why you're pissing in your pants. By the time they're done I figure it will be progressives in power for a thousand years. Are we there yet?

Just look at any number of authoritarian regimes around the world doing perfectly fine. The ones at the top buy the support of a legion of devout followers who'll do what it takes to keep it going. Don't assume people are like you, if there's anything to have learned from this election.
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,268
126

boomerang

Lifer
Jun 19, 2000
18,883
641
126
I'm going to make the easiest prediction ever. Trump supporters will excuse everything Trump fucks up for the next 4 years.
So then it will be just like the Obama supporters did. You show an understanding of human nature that I truly did not think you possessed. :thumbsup:

Politics is a team sport. Everyone knows this. Whether they will admit it or not is what's in question.
 

FelixDeCat

Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
30,975
2,677
126
Trump has not even taken office yet and liberals are criticizing it as a "disaster"?

That is nonsensical, to say the least, and comical to say the more.
 

boomerang

Lifer
Jun 19, 2000
18,883
641
126
Now that I am deeply insulted and thoroughly humiliated by this brilliant piece of sarcasm, may I ask if you have any qualms yet at all about Trump?

Note to self: Put Kleenex on the list.
To answer your question, yes I do. They revolve around the distance he will create between himself and his business interests. But, having stated that, I can't get all worked up about things that may or may not happen in that regard because, and this is really important, they have not yet happened.

Here's something to ponder. Perhaps your news sources have been feeding you their usual bullshit and perhaps you have been lapping it up without thinking or, maybe you already know this. The Clinton Foundation is under investigation. There is some serious pay to play evidence. Look up the 990T documentation for the last year one was filed for the CF and notice how much went to charity (in one form or another) and how much went to operations and other facets of the operation less specific. The charity amount is in the single digits. Hmm, that is counter to the narrative that they are doing wonderful things with the money they got from the House of Saud among other sponsors of terrorism to cite just one modus operandi of their many contributors.

So the question is, if Hillary was about to ascend to the highest office in the land would you be as concerned about the pay to play allegations surrounding her as you would be about pay to play allegations surrounding Trump?

I would be. You?

A bigger question perhaps would be is there anything that can be done to break the ties between Trump and his business interests that would satisfy you? Or, is your hatred and mistrust of him so deeply rooted that nothing will ease your anxiety? Is an "R" all it takes to condemn a politician for you?
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,268
126
Trump has not even taken office yet and liberals are criticizing it as a "disaster"?

That is nonsensical, to say the least, and comical to say the more.


I'd say that Trump is the President we deserve, not because I like him by any stretch of the imagination, but we earned him. BTW I'd think the same about Hillary and I'm not alone. More people disliked the top two than wanted and that's the disaster. Neither side would accept the blame for this but as always it's someone else's fault.

The process which led to these two sorry options is the real disaster. Everything that happens falls out of that as a natural consequence.
 

agent00f

Lifer
Jun 9, 2016
12,203
1,243
86
Now that I am deeply insulted and thoroughly humiliated by this brilliant piece of sarcasm, may I ask if you have any qualms yet at all about Trump?

Note to self: Put Kleenex on the list.

In case you needed evidence that people believe others are like them:
"We're shitty people but the other side is just as bad"

So then it will be just like the Obama supporters did. You show an understanding of human nature that I truly did not think you possessed. :thumbsup:

Politics is a team sport. Everyone knows this. Whether they will admit it or not is what's in question.

I'd say that Trump is the President we deserve, not because I like him by any stretch of the imagination, but we earned him. BTW I'd think the same about Hillary and I'm not alone. More people disliked the top two than wanted and that's the disaster. Neither side would accept the blame for this but as always it's someone else's fault.

The process which led to these two sorry options is the real disaster. Everything that happens falls out of that as a natural consequence.

To answer your question, yes I do. They revolve around the distance he will create between himself and his business interests. But, having stated that, I can't get all worked up about things that may or may not happen in that regard because, and this is really important, they have not yet happened.

Here's something to ponder. Perhaps your news sources have been feeding you their usual bullshit and perhaps you have been lapping it up without thinking or, maybe you already know this. The Clinton Foundation is under investigation. There is some serious pay to play evidence. Look up the 990T documentation for the last year one was filed for the CF and notice how much went to charity (in one form or another) and how much went to operations and other facets of the operation less specific. The charity amount is in the single digits. Hmm, that is counter to the narrative that they are doing wonderful things with the money they got from the House of Saud among other sponsors of terrorism to cite just one modus operandi of their many contributors.

So the question is, if Hillary was about to ascend to the highest office in the land would you be as concerned about the pay to play allegations surrounding her as you would be about pay to play allegations surrounding Trump?

I would be. You?

A bigger question perhaps would be is there anything that can be done to break the ties between Trump and his business interests that would satisfy you? Or, is your hatred and mistrust of him so deeply rooted that nothing will ease your anxiety? Is an "R" all it takes to condemn a politician for you?

Btw, let's not pretend they actually care whether anything is true or not, esp after this one just admitted it's merely cheerleading for him. Just the other day this piece of shit was calling someone a sucker, and of course when it turned out he was the sucker: https://forums.anandtech.com/thread...ecurity-advisors.2491888/page-4#post-38579712, it's off to propagate more fake news.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,685
136
To answer your question, yes I do. They revolve around the distance he will create between himself and his business interests. But, having stated that, I can't get all worked up about things that may or may not happen in that regard because, and this is really important, they have not yet happened.

Here's something to ponder. Perhaps your news sources have been feeding you their usual bullshit and perhaps you have been lapping it up without thinking or, maybe you already know this. The Clinton Foundation is under investigation. There is some serious pay to play evidence. Look up the 990T documentation for the last year one was filed for the CF and notice how much went to charity (in one form or another) and how much went to operations and other facets of the operation less specific. The charity amount is in the single digits. Hmm, that is counter to the narrative that they are doing wonderful things with the money they got from the House of Saud among other sponsors of terrorism to cite just one modus operandi of their many contributors.

So the question is, if Hillary was about to ascend to the highest office in the land would you be as concerned about the pay to play allegations surrounding her as you would be about pay to play allegations surrounding Trump?

I would be. You?

A bigger question perhaps would be is there anything that can be done to break the ties between Trump and his business interests that would satisfy you? Or, is your hatred and mistrust of him so deeply rooted that nothing will ease your anxiety? Is an "R" all it takes to condemn a politician for you?

Bullshit. Substantiate that the Clinton Foundation is under investigation by anybody other than the usual right wing noise machine. "Sources" won't cut it.

Then explain how taking money for personal gain is the same as acting as a money conduit for charitable work.

Break the ties between Trump & his business interests? Hell, we don't even know what those business interests really are given the lack of disclosure by Trump. He could be floating on an ocean of debt to the Russian oligarchy for all we know.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,685
136
I'd say that Trump is the President we deserve, not because I like him by any stretch of the imagination, but we earned him. BTW I'd think the same about Hillary and I'm not alone. More people disliked the top two than wanted and that's the disaster. Neither side would accept the blame for this but as always it's someone else's fault.

The process which led to these two sorry options is the real disaster. Everything that happens falls out of that as a natural consequence.

That reeks of trollish false equivalency.
 

Pens1566

Lifer
Oct 11, 2005
13,712
11,308
136
Eh, it's not a disaster yet. Since it hasn't started. It does have the potential to hit the ground running though. If current trends keep up (Hamilton, Trump U settlement, pay for play, Indian business) it's going to be a scandal filled administration. An argument can be made he'll be in violation of the Emoluments clause immediately upon taking the oath of office.
 
Jul 9, 2009
10,758
2,086
136
“He [Obama] lost the popular vote by a lot and won the election. We should have a revolution in this country!” (Nov. 6) [2012]

“The phoney [sic] electoral college made a laughing stock out of our nation. The loser one!” (Nov. 6) [2012]

“More votes equals a loss…revolution!” (Nov. 7) [2012]


We can't let this happen. We should march on Washington and stop this travesty. Our nation is totally divided!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 7, 2012

Lets fight like hell and stop this great and disgusting injustice! The world is laughing at us.
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 7, 2012

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...he-electoral-college-from-disaster-to-genius/

Amazing! Look at that! It took him 4 years to win the Presidency once he saw how to do it. The guy is a genius.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,685
136
Amazing! Look at that! It took him 4 years to win the Presidency once he saw how to do it. The guy is a genius.

As Jerry Springer once remarked, "Crap sells." When Donald discovered that he could sell the absurdity of Birtherism, he knew the sky was the limit.
 

Puffnstuff

Lifer
Mar 9, 2005
16,196
4,881
136
My prediction is that he will provide SNL with a plethora of material from which to base skits for the next several years.:p
 

Sunburn74

Diamond Member
Oct 5, 2009
5,076
2,635
136
To answer your question, yes I do. They revolve around the distance he will create between himself and his business interests. But, having stated that, I can't get all worked up about things that may or may not happen in that regard because, and this is really important, they have not yet happened.

The Clinton Foundation is under investigation. There is some serious pay to play evidence. Look up the 990T documentation for the last year one was filed for the CF and notice how much went to charity (in one form or another) and how much went to operations and other facets of the operation less specific. The charity amount is in the single digits. Hmm, that is counter to the narrative that they are doing wonderful things with the money they got from the House of Saud among other sponsors of terrorism to cite just one modus operandi of their many contributors.

So the question is, if Hillary was about to ascend to the highest office in the land would you be as concerned about the pay to play allegations surrounding her as you would be about pay to play allegations surrounding Trump?

I would be. You?

A bigger question perhaps would be is there anything that can be done to break the ties between Trump and his business interests that would satisfy you? Or, is your hatred and mistrust of him so deeply rooted that nothing will ease your anxiety? Is an "R" all it takes to condemn a politician for you?
I don't care about pay to play. As the leader of the foundation, she is responsible for its actions but it doesn't mean she is directly overseeing illegal activity or is directly engaging in it. But I yes she is responsible if it happens. You should also understand big companies have a lot of departments and things can happen with the left hand that the right hand doesn't know. I also know that people claim pay to pay and the reality is a lot of that stuff had major oversights by several federal departments who blessed those actions so was it really pay to play or just regular business. If there was pay to play they'd have gotten her already. They haven't. So stop it already with the allegations and conspiracy theories which never end; there is no way for her to end a conspiracy theory about pay to play. How is it fair to keep spouting that stuff?

That being said even if there was pay to play and she was directly involved, honestly I don't care because look no one is perfect. If you dig hard enough, we all break the law (speeding, sharing netflix passwords, etc etc). I don't care. I didn't care about her allegations of pay to play and I didn't care about trump's charity theft allegations either. If you want to be honest, a crazy amount of charities steal. Even the ALS foundation that had the whole ice bucket challenge, I want to say only like 10% goes to actual charity and the remainder go to overhead. All I care about is can the person do the job and does the person see the big issues that face the world.

Look the issue with ties is conflicts of interest. There are so many. His interests will touch on banking law, bankruptcy law, labor laws, whistleblower laws, stock market laws, etc etc. He will have direct interests in all of these. They are inescapable unless he severs all ties. He needs to go blind trust (meaning give the company over to a group he has no access or contact to or control over) or selling it off and trying to buy it back. This stuff of giving it to family members is ridiculous and would never fly in other industries.
 

Muse

Lifer
Jul 11, 2001
40,856
10,215
136
Oh Boy, do I smell fear. It's you who hates Trump, not me. I love him. He, along with a Republican Senate and House are about to become the biggest fuckups In modern history. They are about to drive a stake thought the heart of the Republican party. I can understand why you're pissing in your pants. By the time they're done I figure it will be progressives in power for a thousand years. Are we there yet?
I hope you are oh so right. I figured Trump getting the nomination would do just that, drive a stake through the cold dead heart of the GOP. Maybe it takes this to do it. Weird stuff is gonna happen now.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,725
6,754
126
agent00f: There's a bias, ie empathy, in everyone to think others are like us. In fact we're often naturally disturbed by people not like us.

M: Back in 1999 I was the only person on this forum emphasizing that fact. You say things that are true and yet you do not know why they are true, you don't see these facts lie on deeper principles, you lack an understanding of motivation as almost the whole world does, the truth is terribly painful for anybody with an ego to bear.

a: I think your observations are decent up to this point, but let's put in the context of said empathy. If a person measures himself through skill at figuring things out and getting them right, he will naturally assume someone else is trying to do the same thing, and their failure at it is a reflection of lack of skill acquisition, or iow "stupidity"

M: Lets put it in the proper context. If a person has a fabricated false image of himself that protects him or her from seeing themselves as the really are because they have been made to feel that who they really are is worthless he or she is going to be intentionally 'stupid' about anything that points to that truth.

a: That assumption is the basis of what you're calling "brain defect", and this is where you'll need to ponder further: this is also at the root of that defect conservatives have. To wit, when a conservative reads breitbart and posts that garbage, he thinks that's the same thing as liberals, posting from their liberal media.

M: Every clown suckered by Breitbart is suckered by them because he or she wants to be suckered, has an unconscious emotional need to maintain the ego which buffers against the pain of one's real feelings. But conservatives have a larger pallet of moral values they cater to including a respect for authority, a need for purity group identity.

a: You're largely right/astute that for whatever reason different people do seem to think about the world differently, but their communication flaws in this case both manifest because they each assume the other is just like them.

M: Again, you are telling me what I already know minus what I know also, the reasons behind this.

a: Do you similarly psychoanalyze animals whom you've seen kill when it's in their self interest? Is the cat that's loyal to you but hunts smaller animals for food good or bad?

M: Good and evil do not exist. They are mental constructs that have no actual reality in the world. They are created by thought based on language which can be used to make people feel evil by putting them down. Only those so self divided are capable of evil because they become what they feel. No animal is evil because no other animal but man can hate itself.

a: Think carefully about how these word are being used. I just said they seem to lack virtues like intellectual honesty, deference, or learned empathy for others not exactly like them. When people of that nature act in their self-interest, civilization is poorer for it, just as life was before those virtues were widespread.

M: You think all you want. Wisdom comes from feeling not thinking. What you say here is true but where you go with it is not. You can't blame conservatives for the fact they believe in evil. All of humanity is divided against the self in that way. Only love can unify the self.

a: Many children before learn these and other virtues are often cruel and destructive. Sometime their behavior is best modified by kindness/carrots, and if that doesn't work then more strict means. I mean, you've already more or less admitted they're not the sort to learn things through intellectual methods, so explaining right or wrong to them certainly isn't going to work, per you own understanding of defects above.

M: It is very simple, really. When ones personal insanity harms others one has to be stopped by whatever means necessary.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,725
6,754
126
Eh, it's not a disaster yet. Since it hasn't started. It does have the potential to hit the ground running though. If current trends keep up (Hamilton, Trump U settlement, pay for play, Indian business) it's going to be a scandal filled administration. An argument can be made he'll be in violation of the Emoluments clause immediately upon taking the oath of office.
But what you are saying is that while it hasn't happened yet, you can clearly see it coming, I think.