Why does this question consistently and most often come from those on the left in here?Originally posted by: conjur
Gee...a new troll amongst us.
<sigh>
Who were you before the ban?
Good observations.Originally posted by: yllus
I fail to see what a postponement would accomplish.
The security in Iraq is not going to measurably improve in the near future, so postponement seems pointless. Everyone knew that casualties would increase as the elections drew near. Finally, the administration dares not encourage the insurgents in this way that they may get results using further bloodshed.
Originally posted by: glenn1
So what benefit do you see in postponing them? I can see only two, either so you can say "Aha! Told you that the situation in Iraq is worse than Bush is admitting" or because it fits neatly with your worldview of thinking "those brown people over there" are somehow morally or intellectually incapable of democracy and exercising free will in an acceptable fashion (or in a way that's not how YOU think they should exercise it anyway), sorta like how the left views the red states as "Dumbfuckistan" because they voted Republican rather than Democrat.