Originally posted by: Kevin
Originally posted by: her209
Originally posted by: Kevin
If you're sitting on $5 or $10k (min for some high return CDs) you're much better off in Stocks and Funds. Although your risk is somewhat higher (diversification eliminates most of that risk) your return will (potentially) be higher. Generally you'll want to earn at minimum the going rate of a 90-day T-bill.
Any service charges for having Stocks and Funds? How much better does it usually do compared to a CD?
There are a ton of variables all related to your comfort level. Generally with stocks the only fees you'll pay are your commission fees to the broker, which is pretty cheap if you use one of the online services. However if you give your money to a financial planner they are going to charge you management fees and such. Mutual Funds and the like also carry fees which are outlined in the prospectus. You're looking at a management fee and a load fee and the rates vary for each fund and issuer.
The return on stocks is higher than the return on CDs since the risks are far greater. With stocks there is always that chance you could potentially lose your principal whereas with a CD you won't since it is insured by the FDIC. A stock on the otherhand can plummet overnight, leaving you with nothing.
Fortunately the key to eliminating your risk is diversification. Typically an extremely well-ballanced portfolio should have 20 or more components (stocks, etfs, etc.) in different industries, sectors and companies. A very rough example would be if you bought shares in 2003 of Fannie Mae and held it today you would be down roughly 30%. However if you also purchases Starbucks at that time and held it till today you'd be looking at a 95% gain. This is an extreme example but shows how important it is to diversify.
Also, depending on the account (select retirement funds I believe), the FDIC will insure deposits up to $250k.