Are there any real "Self-Less" acts ?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

jyates

Diamond Member
Aug 18, 2001
3,847
0
76
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: jyates
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: jyates
I know people who help others without expecting anything in
return and they don't do it for a "power trip" either, so I don't
buy the concept that we all do things for others only to bolster
our own self image.

Thats BS.

when you do something for someone you always get something in return. It may not be a thank you or anything material. BUT you get a sense of satisfaction and well-being. Even if you discount that the dead you did helps society on a whole which helps you.

take a philosophy course. they look into this pretty well.

Most of this Philosophy you are talking about is BS.

Sure, you get a sense of well being by helping someone else
but do you help others to get the "feeling" or is the "feeling"
a natural result of helping?

that really does not matter.

the question is "is there any real "self-less" acts?" . you get a sense of satisfaction that makes you feel good and it does society good. It really does not matter if you set out to get the "feeling" or not the end result is you got it.

Also another theory (remember these are theory's not facts) is that by helping the homeless man you are helping society. Wich in a round about way helps you. again you may not have set out to do that but it happens.



True....it doesn't matter what you set out for but what you get as a end result.

But the OP's question was....

"When you do something for someone, is it not primarily to bolster your own self-image ?"

And I say that some people (not all people) do things for others totally for the other people's benefit
and not for the benefit of the "doer" and they don't necessarliy "do" in order "to bolster
their own self-image".
 

Pex

Banned
Aug 21, 2003
1,161
0
0
I know of one. You save someone from a diasaster on your way home from work. You then DISAPEAR after the incident so no one knows you did it. You don't get Hero status...a BJ from the victim (if female) or any cash reward.


edit: satisfaction of knowing you saved a life? maybe....fulfillment? maybe.
 

Kipper

Diamond Member
Feb 18, 2000
7,366
0
0
Originally posted by: Pex
I know of one. You save someone from a diasaster on your way home from work. You then DISAPEAR after the incident so no one knows you did it. You don't get Hero status...a BJ from the victim (if female) or any cash reward.

Wrong. You may have gotten one of the following out of saving that person:

1.) Warm, fuzzy feeling inside.
2.) If you are religious, perhaps rewards in the afterlife.
3.) You may have stolen things from work that you somehow feel saving someone will have made up for (karma).

Incidentally, women aren't the only people who give out oral sex.
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
Originally posted by: Pex
I know of one. You save someone from a diasaster on your way home from work. You then DISAPEAR after the incident so no one knows you did it. You don't get Hero status...a BJ from the victim (if female) or any cash reward.

again you still get the ego boost from saving someones life.

jyates: the OP also had "is there any real "self-less" acts?" In the title wich is where i got that from.
 

jyates

Diamond Member
Aug 18, 2001
3,847
0
76
Originally posted by: polm
Originally posted by: jyates
Originally posted by: polm
Originally posted by: jyates
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: jyates
I know people who help others without expecting anything in
return and they don't do it for a "power trip" either, so I don't
buy the concept that we all do things for others only to bolster
our own self image.

Thats BS.

when you do something for someone you always get something in return. It may not be a thank you or anything material. BUT you get a sense of satisfaction and well-being. Even if you discount that the dead you did helps society on a whole which helps you.

take a philosophy course. they look into this pretty well.

Most of this Philosophy you are talking about is BS.

Sure, you get a sense of well being by helping someone else
but do you help others to get the "feeling" or is the "feeling"
a natural result of helping?

the chicken !


no...the egg.


no wait...the chicken !!

Hey....remember you started the thread there buddy :)

sorry. That thread about Pot must have given me a contact high.

truth is, I think your reaching.

Would you continue to perform these so called selfless acts if they caused you discomfort and no feeling of accomplishment, joy, etc. ??


Your original question was..........
"When you do something for someone, is it not primarily to bolster your own self-image ?

I'm not saying that a feeling of well being or satisfaction of doing for others isn't a benefit of doing
but I don't believe that every person who "does" for others is doing it "to bolster their own self-image".

And I don't think that anyone in the world can "do for others" without feeling some sense of
accomplishment after the deed is done.
 

KarenMarie

Elite Member
Sep 20, 2003
14,372
6
81
I am not quite sure I understand the people who say that there is no such thing as a totally selfless act. I understand that many ppl do stuff to get recognition, or reward points or something, but cannot say that there is no one that ever does something for no other reason than because it is a nice thing to do. Or because it is the right thing to do. There are certain things that people do that actually cost them, both short and long term, that they get nothing in return for.

If there are truly no selfless acts and no selfless serving people then this world would be totally fvcked up with no hope.

I think the behaviour of the ppl on 9/11 is a fine example of the selfless acts of others, especially the ones that crashed the plane into the ground to save others.

:)
 

GiLtY

Golden Member
Sep 10, 2000
1,487
1
0
Originally posted by: gopunk
Originally posted by: GiLtY
Reminds me of a book that I've read like two years ago, it's called "The Selfish Gene". Basically the guy talks about how every action is the result of the gene wanting to survive. Early on in the book he talked about altruism and how true altruism is almost non-existant, an interest read if you are into biology/philosophy. BUT, the book is fairly pessimistic, so you have been warned :p.

--GiLtY

richard dawkins

its not pessismistic... just realistic ;)

Realistic yet sad :p. I did like the chapter where he was optimistic about a city in S.A for their closeness to nature and efficient transportation system.

--GiLtY
 

Turin39789

Lifer
Nov 21, 2000
12,218
8
81
bullshit, telling me I get an ego boost from doing things for other people, when i buy a homeless person a meal, i end up short of cash but thats it. I dont get a pat on the back, I dont give myself a pat on the back.

Thats not to say that I am altruistic all of the time, sometimes I pass the bum up, sometimes I do feel good about myself, others I just tell myself I that I cant afford to do that. I identifiy with people down on their luck, they are people after all , and I feel that if I can do anything to help, I should.
 

gopunk

Lifer
Jul 7, 2001
29,239
2
0
Originally posted by: KarenMarie
I am not quite sure I understand the people who say that there is no such thing as a totally selfless act. I understand that many ppl do stuff to get recognition, or reward points or something, but cannot say that there is no one that ever does something for no other reason than because it is a nice thing to do. Or because it is the right thing to do. There are certain things that people do that actually cost them, both short and long term, that they get nothing in return for.

If there are truly no selfless acts and no selfless serving people then this world would be totally fvcked up with no hope.

I think the behaviour of the ppl on 9/11 is a fine example of the selfless acts of others, especially the ones that crashed the plane into the ground to save others.

:)

that's what people mean... if you do something because it is "nice" or "the right thing", then you get a warm and fuzzy feeling inside. you do it because you want to be nice, you want to do the right thing. you might not get any other reward, but that is reward in and of itself.

that's not really what the OP is saying, but yea.
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
Originally posted by: Turin39789
bullshit, telling me I get an ego boost from doing things for other people, when i buy a homeless person a meal, i end up short of cash but thats it. I dont get a pat on the back, I dont give myself a pat on the back.

Thats not to say that I am altruistic all of the time, sometimes I pass the bum up, sometimes I do feel good about myself, others I just tell myself I that I cant afford to do that. I identifiy with people down on their luck, they are people after all , and I feel that if I can do anything to help, I should.

so you don't get a sense of satisfaction from giving the holemss person a sandwich? You don't get any feelings at all? BULLSHIT.
 

Turin39789

Lifer
Nov 21, 2000
12,218
8
81
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: Turin39789
bullshit, telling me I get an ego boost from doing things for other people, when i buy a homeless person a meal, i end up short of cash but thats it. I dont get a pat on the back, I dont give myself a pat on the back.

Thats not to say that I am altruistic all of the time, sometimes I pass the bum up, sometimes I do feel good about myself, others I just tell myself I that I cant afford to do that. I identifiy with people down on their luck, they are people after all , and I feel that if I can do anything to help, I should.

so you don't get a sense of satisfaction from giving the holemss person a sandwich? You don't get any feelings at all? BULLSHIT.


dont tell me what I feel.
 

Kipper

Diamond Member
Feb 18, 2000
7,366
0
0
Originally posted by: KarenMarie
I am not quite sure I understand the people who say that there is no such thing as a totally selfless act. I understand that many ppl do stuff to get recognition, or reward points or something, but cannot say that there is no one that ever does something for no other reason than because it is a nice thing to do. Or because it is the right thing to do. There are certain things that people do that actually cost them, both short and long term, that they get nothing in return for.

If there are truly no selfless acts and no selfless serving people then this world would be totally fvcked up with no hope.

I think the behaviour of the ppl on 9/11 is a fine example of the selfless acts of others, especially the ones that crashed the plane into the ground to save others.

:)

That's not a good example because they could have possibly known that they would have been remembered as heroes or martyrs. Moreover, it's not necessarily true that if there were no selfless acts/people that the world would be in a bad state - you see, the problem with being an egoist, looking after your own interests alone, is that if everybody plays your game, you can't get anywhere, and society will not get anywhere. Therefore, while people are egoists at heart, they must be to some extent altrusitic in order to realize some personal gain from living in society or being a participant in the social contract.
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
Originally posted by: Turin39789
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: Turin39789
bullshit, telling me I get an ego boost from doing things for other people, when i buy a homeless person a meal, i end up short of cash but thats it. I dont get a pat on the back, I dont give myself a pat on the back.

Thats not to say that I am altruistic all of the time, sometimes I pass the bum up, sometimes I do feel good about myself, others I just tell myself I that I cant afford to do that. I identifiy with people down on their luck, they are people after all , and I feel that if I can do anything to help, I should.

so you don't get a sense of satisfaction from giving the holemss person a sandwich? You don't get any feelings at all? BULLSHIT.


dont tell me what I feel.

I don't have to. I know that you are full of crap.

You stated that you can identify with them being down on their luck. So you are doing something to help. The reward you get is a sense of honor, accomplishment, satisfaction and hope. again these are rewards for helping. which stops it from being a selfish act.

have you taken a ethics or philosophy class? they go into it.
 

Kipper

Diamond Member
Feb 18, 2000
7,366
0
0
Originally posted by: Turin39789
bullshit, telling me I get an ego boost from doing things for other people, when i buy a homeless person a meal, i end up short of cash but thats it. I dont get a pat on the back, I dont give myself a pat on the back.

Thats not to say that I am altruistic all of the time, sometimes I pass the bum up, sometimes I do feel good about myself, others I just tell myself I that I cant afford to do that. I identifiy with people down on their luck, they are people after all , and I feel that if I can do anything to help, I should.

It doesn't matter if your net financial statement is -$5 after the act, whether you're short a limb or die in the process. What is relevant to the act itself is what you stand to gain out of it, whether it be a pittance, a fuzzy feeling inside, or recognition from peers, supernatural, or other. I find it hard to believe that you don't feel good inside after doing X, Y, or Z act which could be deemed 'good' in a general sense - I certainly do, and while I don't feel bad feeling good I do recognize that there is some sort of inner desire to feel that feeling which pushes me to do it, and I don't think that's necessarily right.

Edit: As Waggy says, philosophers argue about this back and forth - it's all nicely summarized in the short but dense Kant text.
 

eLiu

Diamond Member
Jun 4, 2001
6,407
1
0
I think if you sacrificed your life to save someone else's life, that would be pretty damn self-less. I personally believe that there is nothing after death...so there isn't even the remote-est possibility of ego there. Unless you get your highs on having people speak well of you at your funeral...but somehow I figure that'd be the last thing on your mind if the above-mentioned situation occured.
 

Kipper

Diamond Member
Feb 18, 2000
7,366
0
0
Originally posted by: eLiu
I think if you sacrificed your life to save someone else's life, that would be pretty damn self-less. I personally believe that there is nothing after death...so there isn't even the remote-est possibility of ego there. Unless you get your highs on having people speak well of you at your funeral...but somehow I figure that'd be the last thing on your mind if the above-mentioned situation occured.

Once again, martyrdom, fame, or being remembered. While the action is to be applauded (perhaps), that act has no worth in a moral context unless it is done out of duty - duty being the only impetus behind that action.
 

gopunk

Lifer
Jul 7, 2001
29,239
2
0
Originally posted by: eLiu
I think if you sacrificed your life to save someone else's life, that would be pretty damn self-less. I personally believe that there is nothing after death...so there isn't even the remote-est possibility of ego there. Unless you get your highs on having people speak well of you at your funeral...but somehow I figure that'd be the last thing on your mind if the above-mentioned situation occured.

most people that put their lives in harms way for others say something the lines of "i couldn't have lived with myself if i didn't" or something like that. you get the point...
 

Turin39789

Lifer
Nov 21, 2000
12,218
8
81
Originally posted by: MadCowDisease
Originally posted by: eLiu
I think if you sacrificed your life to save someone else's life, that would be pretty damn self-less. I personally believe that there is nothing after death...so there isn't even the remote-est possibility of ego there. Unless you get your highs on having people speak well of you at your funeral...but somehow I figure that'd be the last thing on your mind if the above-mentioned situation occured.

Once again, martyrdom, fame, or being remembered. While the action is to be applauded (perhaps), that act has no worth in a moral context unless it is done out of duty - duty being the only impetus behind that action.

what about those who view such actions as their duty to humanity?

nice to see so many people dedicated to old philosophers
 

KarenMarie

Elite Member
Sep 20, 2003
14,372
6
81
Ok, let me see if I understand.

Doing something that is the right thing to do, or is just a nice thing to do cannot be considered selfless.. because the feeling of 'warm & fuzzy' inside makes it selfish. Therefore, it cannot be considered truly selfless?

Is that the opinion?
Seriously, I am trying to understand that concept.
 

mobobuff

Lifer
Apr 5, 2004
11,099
1
81
The only way you could achieve that is to do something that makes YOU feel like complete sh!t but makes the other person feel great.

So, in theory, to be completely selfless is... to have no self, to have no spine.
 

polm

Diamond Member
May 24, 2001
3,183
0
0
Originally posted by: KarenMarie
Ok, let me see if I understand.

Doing something that is the right thing to do, or is just a nice thing to do cannot be considered selfless.. because the feeling of 'warm & fuzzy' inside makes it selfish. Therefore, it cannot be considered truly selfless?

Is that the opinion?
Seriously, I am trying to understand that concept.

ding ding ding !
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
Originally posted by: KarenMarie
Ok, let me see if I understand.

Doing something that is the right thing to do, or is just a nice thing to do cannot be considered selfless.. because the feeling of 'warm & fuzzy' inside makes it selfish. Therefore, it cannot be considered truly selfless?

Is that the opinion?
Seriously, I am trying to understand that concept.

yeap thats it. If you get a reward no matter how small (a good feeling etc) then it can't be a totely self-less act.

at least thats one theory.