no, as it would take an extrordinary amount of work to convert FuseTalk into ASPOriginally posted by: amdfanboy
?
Originally posted by: GtPrOjEcTX
no, as it would take an extrordinary amount of work to convert FuseTalk into ASPOriginally posted by: amdfanboy
?
wow, time to eat some pie! (or crow, or whatever you eat when you're wrong...)Originally posted by: JasonClark
Yes, fusetalk.net is almost done.
Originally posted by: GtPrOjEcTX
wow, time to eat some pie! (or crow, or whatever you eat when you're wrong...)Originally posted by: JasonClark
Yes, fusetalk.net is almost done.
Originally posted by: Sundog
Originally posted by: GtPrOjEcTX
wow, time to eat some pie! (or crow, or whatever you eat when you're wrong...)Originally posted by: JasonClark
Yes, fusetalk.net is almost done.
Mmmmm....Apple pie![]()
Originally posted by: JasonClark
Yes, fusetalk.net is almost done.
Originally posted by: Xiety
Originally posted by: Sundog
Originally posted by: GtPrOjEcTX
wow, time to eat some pie! (or crow, or whatever you eat when you're wrong...)Originally posted by: JasonClark
Yes, fusetalk.net is almost done.
Mmmmm....Apple pie![]()
can't we eat cheesecakes?![]()
![]()
Originally posted by: amdfanboy
Originally posted by: JasonClark
Yes, fusetalk.net is almost done.
:Q OMG noes teh evil M$ is takin ova AT f0rums :Q:Q:Q
Any reason you decided to move to .NET ?
No more JRUN? BSOD instead? Just kidding...Originally posted by: amdfanboy
:Q OMG noes teh evil M$ is takin ova AT f0rums :Q:Q:QOriginally posted by: JasonClark
Yes, fusetalk.net is almost done.
Any reason you decided to move to .NET ?
Originally posted by: Beau
Originally posted by: amdfanboy
Originally posted by: JasonClark
Yes, fusetalk.net is almost done.
:Q OMG noes teh evil M$ is takin ova AT f0rums :Q:Q:Q
Any reason you decided to move to .NET ?
.Net applications can be sold for more $$$ than php based ones![]()
![]()
I could be wrong about thisOriginally posted by: Beau
Originally posted by: amdfanboy
Originally posted by: JasonClark
Yes, fusetalk.net is almost done.
:Q OMG noes teh evil M$ is takin ova AT f0rums :Q:Q:Q
Any reason you decided to move to .NET ?
.Net applications can be sold for more $$$ than php based ones![]()
![]()
Originally posted by: GtPrOjEcTX
I could be wrong about thisOriginally posted by: Beau
Originally posted by: amdfanboy
Originally posted by: JasonClark
Yes, fusetalk.net is almost done.
:Q OMG noes teh evil M$ is takin ova AT f0rums :Q:Q:Q
Any reason you decided to move to .NET ?
.Net applications can be sold for more $$$ than php based ones![]()
![]()
but you're saying FuseTalk was php (now and before?).... Thought it was coldfusion.
Originally posted by: FFMCobalt
There's nothing wrong with .NET or other MS applications. MS is the leader for a reason.
Originally posted by: wallsfd949
This IS a dumb question but is anandtech associated in any way with fusetalk?
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Originally posted by: GtPrOjEcTX
I could be wrong about thisOriginally posted by: Beau
Originally posted by: amdfanboy
Originally posted by: JasonClark
Yes, fusetalk.net is almost done.
:Q OMG noes teh evil M$ is takin ova AT f0rums :Q:Q:Q
Any reason you decided to move to .NET ?
.Net applications can be sold for more $$$ than php based ones![]()
![]()
but you're saying FuseTalk was php (now and before?).... Thought it was coldfusion.
It is crapfusion. But what languages are available to write it in? Crapfusion, php, perl, and .net are the biggest ones, IMO. Since it's a bunch of a MS fans running the site, .net is the logical choice.
Hopefully they know .net better than they know the technologies they have in place now.![]()
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Originally posted by: GtPrOjEcTX
I could be wrong about thisOriginally posted by: Beau
Originally posted by: amdfanboy
Originally posted by: JasonClark
Yes, fusetalk.net is almost done.
:Q OMG noes teh evil M$ is takin ova AT f0rums :Q:Q:Q
Any reason you decided to move to .NET ?
.Net applications can be sold for more $$$ than php based ones![]()
![]()
but you're saying FuseTalk was php (now and before?).... Thought it was coldfusion.
It is crapfusion. But what languages are available to write it in? Crapfusion, php, perl, and .net are the biggest ones, IMO. Since it's a bunch of a MS fans running the site, .net is the logical choice.
Hopefully they know .net better than they know the technologies they have in place now.![]()
So your saying we would be better off switching to whole hawg unix?
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Originally posted by: GtPrOjEcTX
I could be wrong about thisOriginally posted by: Beau
Originally posted by: amdfanboy
Originally posted by: JasonClark
Yes, fusetalk.net is almost done.
:Q OMG noes teh evil M$ is takin ova AT f0rums :Q:Q:Q
Any reason you decided to move to .NET ?
.Net applications can be sold for more $$$ than php based ones![]()
![]()
but you're saying FuseTalk was php (now and before?).... Thought it was coldfusion.
It is crapfusion. But what languages are available to write it in? Crapfusion, php, perl, and .net are the biggest ones, IMO. Since it's a bunch of a MS fans running the site, .net is the logical choice.
Hopefully they know .net better than they know the technologies they have in place now.![]()
So your saying we would be better off switching to whole hawg unix?
not necessary on client machines. for an example go to www.anandtech.com (which already is .NET) on a machine that doesn't have the framework installed.Originally posted by: KnightBreed
Stupid question, I'm sure, as I'm not terribly familiar with .NET.
Does ASP.NET need the .NET framework installed on client machines or is that a function of the features actually being used by the web site?