- Dec 18, 2010
- 18,811
- 197
- 106
While browsing the BBC website, I came across this article about Duke Nukem Forever (DNF).
http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/13688993
Scroll down towards the bottom, and I quote, referring to DNF:
With all of the bad reviews, how can DNF be called a triple A title?
Next, lets take a look at Brink, which was hyped for months before release. After Brink was released, it looks like yet another battlefield game with different graphics.
It appears to me that game developers are out of touch with what consumers want. Instead of producing new ideas, just reuse what has already been done and "call" it new.
Take a look at the left 4 dead series, and compare it to Black Ops and Brink. L4d introduces something new, black ops and brink look like the same games that have been remade dozens of times already.
Metro2033 published by some developer I have never heard of introduced gamers to a whole new world. So if some unknown developer can do it, why cant the major players?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/13688993
Scroll down towards the bottom, and I quote, referring to DNF:
"It's absolutely a triple A, modern, advanced game for this era"
Randy Pitchford, executive producer
With all of the bad reviews, how can DNF be called a triple A title?
Next, lets take a look at Brink, which was hyped for months before release. After Brink was released, it looks like yet another battlefield game with different graphics.
It appears to me that game developers are out of touch with what consumers want. Instead of producing new ideas, just reuse what has already been done and "call" it new.
Take a look at the left 4 dead series, and compare it to Black Ops and Brink. L4d introduces something new, black ops and brink look like the same games that have been remade dozens of times already.
Metro2033 published by some developer I have never heard of introduced gamers to a whole new world. So if some unknown developer can do it, why cant the major players?