Responsible? I smell confusion. You should be talking "overbinning," which is my whole point - clocking chips to within 100MHz of their lives!
I already showed (# 79 above) that on this system I can run 5GHZ all cores on the 9900K at ~ 168w.
How many people can do that? AT did worse:
https://www.anandtech.com/show/13400/intel-9th-gen-core-i9-9900k-i7-9700k-i5-9600k-review/22
It's going to depend heavily on load. I don't think what load was used in post #79. Anandtech mentioned a much lower v-core on their 5 GHz overclock while reporting 192 W which makes me think the earlier post was a much lighter load, even if it spanned decently across all threads.
And I know a guy who basically never brushes his teeth and yet he has bright white and nice teeth. You should both bless your lucky stars and shouldn't think that it applies to everyone else - or rather anyone else.I already showed (# 79 above) that on this system I can run 5GHZ all cores on the 9900K at ~ 168w.
It's going to depend heavily on load. I don't think what load was used in post #79. Anandtech mentioned a much lower v-core on their 5 GHz overclock while reporting 192 W which makes me think the earlier post was a much lighter load, even if it spanned decently across all threads.
All of these games have a feature that records your input and allows you to render them the same way you would render any 3d scene...all except for GTA V that only shows 11% improvement.
Sure they will.How low is low enough?
They'll be eating close to 180w for 8c at 5GHz even with the most efficient CPUs. That'll be twice what AMD will be matching it with the 3800X.
Yup they will have the "stocking buster" ready for holidays because that's when people spend the most money on this stuff.The key thing I took away from the announcement was this: "Q4".
Do I think what is any kind of sustainable business model?You have it all wrong, and if you think it is right do you think it is any kind of sustainable business model?
It's neither deceptive nor cheating because they simply do not state what exactly they measured there was zero words or video or even picture,just an icon of the game and a percentage, we have no idea what they benchmarked.Are you really suggesting AMD is not being deceptive, but outright cheating with those numbers?? That would turn out to be a PR disaster if not outright illegal.
It's neither deceptive nor cheating because they simply do not state what exactly they measured there was zero words or video or even picture,just an icon of the game and a percentage, we have no idea what they benchmarked.
Lol the last (quite a) few years all we get is canned benchmarks,any time you saw a CS:GO bench with more then 300FPS it's from a pre recorded game.It would be precisely the dictionary definition!
Deceptive - giving an appearance or impression different from the true one; misleading.
A claim like "34% faster in CS:GO", with no other details, would be assumed by any reasonable person to mean an increase in gameplay performance. That's what is measured in benchmarks (ideally), gameplay reviews like HardOCP, and really just about any time people discuss gaming performance, including product launches in every category.
Lol the last (quite a) few years all we get is canned benchmarks,any time you saw a CS:GO bench with more then 300FPS it's from a pre recorded game.
Especially HardOCP still uses the lost planet canned bench that just throws tons of objects on the screen and has nothing to do with how the game,or any game, runs.
https://www.pcgamesn.com/intel/worlds-best-gaming-processor-challenge-amd-ryzen-3000
Well, I guess it's confirmed that the answer to OP's question is yes.
I have just seen this. Cracked me up a bit. What gaming person is going out and spending £500 on just the CPU!! It's not about "The perfect gaming CPU" it's about usability and cost effectiveness. Which Intel has been useless at for a while.
So the 9900k is effectively becoming a worse product.
when math defeats your math-based business because marketing told you to do a thing.
What are the chances of the upcoming 9900ks not running hotter than the 9900k at their stock speeds? Won't the cooling requirements be even higher than the current 9900k requires to avoid thermal throttling?
unless you are high FPS gamer, it is pointless to buy anything from Intel nowWhat are the chances of the upcoming 9900ks not running hotter than the 9900k at their stock speeds? Won't the cooling requirements be even higher than the current 9900k requires to avoid thermal throttling?
What are the chances of the upcoming 9900ks not running hotter than the 9900k at their stock speeds? Won't the cooling requirements be even higher than the current 9900k requires to avoid thermal throttling?