Originally posted by: AstroManLuca
People who claim to have used G4 laptops in Leopard and say that it was "fast" or "snappy" are either lying or don't know what those terms mean.
I had a 12" PowerBook, 1.5 GHz G4, 1.25 GB of RAM. Nothing wrong with it. Ran Tiger at marginally acceptable speeds. Installed Leopard, ran like crap. I've subsequently had a bunch of people on the internet say I'm nuts because their PowerBook G4s were fine under Leopard. I think my standards are just higher. Only way to really explain the phenomenon.
Anyway, sindows, I answered a resounding "no" after reading only the title of your thread, but upon reading the post, that just reinforces it. G4s suck under Leopard, no two ways about it. And honestly they were never that great under Tiger either.
Sadly, PowerBook G4s use DDR, not DDR2, which is both more expensive and available in lower capacities. 2x1 GB is the best you can do with DDR, and it'll cost a bit (not too much but more than DDR2 would be, maybe around $60). It'll help some but the fact is the G4 is an embedded processor that was never designed to go into personal computers and it's just a crappy CPU overall.
I can't take "facts" from you as my Powerbook does take ddr2 ram. Look it up if you need to. On my Powerbook, Leopard runs no slower than Tiger but there is something wrong with mine as its not running as quick as it should be.