• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Are all these verses actually in the bible?

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: engineereeyore
1 Cor. 6:9 : Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,

Ahh, from roughly the same part of my example stating "women aren't allowed to talk in church".
 
Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem
Originally posted by: engineereeyore
Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem
Where was it condemned? I have never read it so I know very little about verses and passages and what not.

Romans 1:27 : And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

1 Cor. 6:9 : Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,

Jude 1:7 : Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.

Homosexuality was practiced in Sodom and Gomorrha and is one of the act condemned in the verse in Jude (Gen. 19:5).

Who wrote all that? Is it labeled by Author, like Romans wrote his part, Cor his, and Jude his?
I really know nothing about the bible.
I think Cor. might mean Corinthians?

The first two were written by Paul.

I don't recall about Jude.
 
Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem
Originally posted by: engineereeyore

Romans 1:27 : And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

1 Cor. 6:9 : Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,

Jude 1:7 : Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.

Homosexuality was practiced in Sodom and Gomorrha and is one of the act condemned in the verse in Jude (Gen. 19:5).

Who wrote all that? Is it labeled by Author, like Romans wrote his part, Cor his, and Jude his?
I really know nothing about the bible.
I think Cor. might mean Corinthians?

No problem. Romans and 1st Corinthian were epistles written by Paul to the people in those respective areas. Jude was written by Jude.
 
Other fun parts about 1 Cor

6:7 The very fact that you have lawsuits among you means you have been completely defeated already.
Proves lawsuits=we're screwed.

7:10-11 To the married I give this command (not I, but the Lord): A wife must not separate from her husband. But if she does, she must remain unmarried or else be reconciled to her husband. And a husband must not divorce his wife.
Women may divorce men but can't remarry, and men cannot divorce at all.

Does this mean that lawyers are sinners, as are women who remarry after a divorce, as well as all men who ask for a divorce?
 
I would say that not everything of the Old Testament was done away with since Jesus came. Jesus said "I come not to destroy the law but to fulfill it." Throughout the New Testament there are two particular areas of the moral law that remain in effect: laws against sexual sin and laws against anger and hatred. Jesus, in the sermon on the mount, talked about those two items: "anyone who lusts in his heart is guilty of adultery, and anyone who is angry with a brother in his heart is guilty of murder." The apostle Paul writes about the same two things--Christians uphold sexual purity and are against anger and hatred. That helps define what love means--gives it some boundaries.

What was done away with in the OT were not the moral laws (10 Commandments) but the cultic laws about animal sacrifice and dietary rules, and Temple worship, etc.. Jesus said, "It's not what goes into your mouth that causes you to sin (thus, eliminating dietary rules) but what comes out of your heart." The moral law is still valid until the end of time and the coming of the kingdom, when heaven and earth shall be one.
 
Quotes taken out of historical and literary context are just stupid. I could probably selectively quote from the U.S. Constitution to make some dicey comments...

"After all, I just proved that women aren't allowed to speak in church, if you rape someone you have to marry them, and virgins are booty. Because it says so in the bible."

Context:
1. Paul's reprimand to one particular church which had issues with women disrupting worship
2. Jewish law from old, old times
3. I'm not even going to comment about selective quoting.

"the entire bible (old and new testament) are full of modifications. who knows what's in there is correct or not"

You know what? I'm a Biological Anthropology major and the evolutionary tree has been modified more times than I can count on my fingers and toes. Currently, the consensus is that we are NOT descended from apes, chimps or orangutans, and we diverged from a common ancestor ~5-6 million years ago as hominins. I find it amusing that many people have such "faith" in evolutionary theory. If Christians changed their views so drastically all the time...

Oh, and let me re-emphasize this point: According to evolutionary theory, we are NOT descended from apes, chimps, orangutans, and CERTAINLY not monkeys. My criticisms go both to proponents of evolution who have no bloody idea what they're talking about and to fundamentalist Christians who give the rest of us a bad name for their ignorance and overly-literal interpretation (can you even call it interpretation, when you take it at face value?) of the Bible.

*Leaves and puts flame-retardant firewall on his internet connection*
 
Originally posted by: Spartan Niner
Quotes taken out of historical and literary context are just stupid. I could probably selectively quote from the U.S. Constitution to make some dicey comments...

"After all, I just proved that women aren't allowed to speak in church, if you rape someone you have to marry them, and virgins are booty. Because it says so in the bible."

Context:
1. Paul's reprimand to one particular church which had issues with women disrupting worship
2. Jewish law from old, old times
3. I'm not even going to comment about selective quoting.

"the entire bible (old and new testament) are full of modifications. who knows what's in there is correct or not"

You know what? I'm a Biological Anthropology major and the evolutionary tree has been modified more times than I can count on my fingers and toes. Currently, the consensus is that we are NOT descended from apes, chimps or orangutans, and we diverged from a common ancestor ~5-6 million years ago as hominins. I find it amusing that many people have such "faith" in evolutionary theory. If Christians changed their views so drastically all the time...

Oh, and let me re-emphasize this point: According to evolutionary theory, we are NOT descended from apes, chimps, orangutans, and CERTAINLY not monkeys. My criticisms go both to proponents of evolution who have no bloody idea what they're talking about and to fundamentalist Christians who give the rest of us a bad name for their ignorance and overly-literal interpretation (can you even call it interpretation, when you take it at face value?) of the Bible.

*Leaves and puts flame-retardant firewall on his internet connection*

In my experience the people who say that evolution claims man descended from ape/monkey are fundamentalist Christians. I don't think I have once heard someone who supports evolution argue that we (us and today's primates) didn't evolve from a common ancestor.
 
Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem
Originally posted by: RapidSnail
Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem
Originally posted by: RapidSnail
Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem
Originally posted by: mooglekit
They are all there, but also all Old Testament laws which, from a Christian perspective, we were all released from through Jesus' death on the cross...this has been discussed in a bunch of threads before and will inevitably end up in a flame war, but yeah...

Basically arguments like: "You're a hypocrite because you work on the Sabbath" or "The Sabbath is Saturday, dumbass"

I love these threads! 😀

So they are not valid anymore?

Should you kill [murder]?

That's illegal in more than the biblical sense.

Is it still sinful?

It's illegal and wrong. But I wouldn't do it even if it wasn't.

For reference, if you're looking for a better understanding of why murder would still be sinful, take a closer look at the fundamental idea behind the "New Covenant," which essentially is the new agreement with God laid out through Jesus' teachings (commandments). The 10 commandments ARE incorporated into Jesus' teaching and, as such, are included in the "New Covenant" with God, and we should strive to follow them.

Jesus' Commandments

Another Look

That said, I am Lutheran and one of the tenets of Lutheran theology is being saved by God's grace alone. Through my faith in God and in Jesus, I gain the grace of God's forgiveness for all my sins. I will never claim to be perfect, I have had many "un-Christian" moments, but I will continue to try and better myself despite those short-comings.

Matthew 22:36-40 36 "Teacher, which is the greatest commandment in the Law?" 37Jesus replied: " 'Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.'(a) 38 This is the first and greatest commandment. 39 And the second is like it: 'Love your neighbor as yourself.'(b) 40 All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments."

(a) Matthew 22:37 references Deut. 6:5
(b) Matthew 22:39 references Lev. 19:18
 
Originally posted by: meltdown75
Originally posted by: GagHalfrunt
Originally posted by: mercanucaribe
Why can Bible beaters pick and choose what they want to follow literally?

Because it's the only way the can justify following their fairy tales. Most of Christianity is an abomination against mankind. The atrocities mandated by the Bible make radical Islam look like Barney singing a song for kids. But since weak-minded fools want to believe in eternal paradise they just filter out the parts of the religion they don't like. They are no REAL Christians on earth, there are just millions of poseurs who have chosen one belief from column A, 2 beliefs from colum B and managed to convince themselves that what they WANT to do is really what God expects them to do.
...and the most petty, worthless, spiteful, hateful vile creatures of all are those that are not happy enough to simply believe in nothing at all and keep to themselves, but will continually and incessantly attack the beliefs of others. You are example # A1 in this regard. I hope you're proud of it because you sure do work hard for it.

Nope, making you bible-thumpers look like idiots for picking and choosing your own prejudices and then calling them a religion to justify your hatred of yourselves and others isn't work at all. YOU clowns take care of the hard part, I just point out that none of you actually believe in the bible, only in the parts of it that reinforce your own beliefs.
 
Originally posted by: Spartan Niner
Quotes taken out of historical and literary context are just stupid. I could probably selectively quote from the U.S. Constitution to make some dicey comments...

"After all, I just proved that women aren't allowed to speak in church, if you rape someone you have to marry them, and virgins are booty. Because it says so in the bible."

Context:
1. Paul's reprimand to one particular church which had issues with women disrupting worship
2. Jewish law from old, old times
3. I'm not even going to comment about selective quoting.

"the entire bible (old and new testament) are full of modifications. who knows what's in there is correct or not"

You know what? I'm a Biological Anthropology major and the evolutionary tree has been modified more times than I can count on my fingers and toes. Currently, the consensus is that we are NOT descended from apes, chimps or orangutans, and we diverged from a common ancestor ~5-6 million years ago as hominins. I find it amusing that many people have such "faith" in evolutionary theory. If Christians changed their views so drastically all the time...

Oh, and let me re-emphasize this point: According to evolutionary theory, we are NOT descended from apes, chimps, orangutans, and CERTAINLY not monkeys. My criticisms go both to proponents of evolution who have no bloody idea what they're talking about and to fundamentalist Christians who give the rest of us a bad name for their ignorance and overly-literal interpretation (can you even call it interpretation, when you take it at face value?) of the Bible.

*Leaves and puts flame-retardant firewall on his internet connection*

Are you sure you aren't going for a BS in Creation of Straw Apes For The Sake of Being Contrary?
 
Originally posted by: Demon-Xanth
Other fun parts about 1 Cor

6:7 The very fact that you have lawsuits among you means you have been completely defeated already.
Proves lawsuits=we're screwed.

It is simply meant as a message of encouragement to try to work things out between each other rather than taking things to trial. And, if possible, even if one party is unwilling to work together, the other party should, when possible, let it go and know that all will be settled at a latter time. I think the world could benefit greatly from this advice.

7:10-11 To the married I give this command (not I, but the Lord): A wife must not separate from her husband. But if she does, she must remain unmarried or else be reconciled to her husband. And a husband must not divorce his wife.

Women may divorce men but can't remarry, and men cannot divorce at all.

Since Paul is commenting on what the Lord has said, why don't you look at exactly what he did say.

Matt. 19:9 : And I say unto you, Whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery: and whoso marrieth her which is put away doth commit adultery.

There are legitimate reasons and causes for divorce, but they are few. Again, a lesson I think the world could greatly learn from.

Does this mean that lawyers are sinners, as are women who remarry after a divorce, as well as all men who ask for a divorce?

Not the way I see it.
 
It is worth noting that preconceived ideologies have contorted the translations of the original epistles as they appear in the versions of the Bible popular today.

Originally posted by: engineereeyore
Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem
Where was it condemned? I have never read it so I know very little about verses and passages and what not.

Romans 1:27 : And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.
http://www.lionking.org/~kovu/bible/section04.html


1 Cor. 6:9 : Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,
http://www.lionking.org/~kovu/bible/section07.html

Jude 1:7 : Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.

Homosexuality was practiced in Sodom and Gomorrha and is one of the act condemned in the verse in Jude (Gen. 19:5).
http://www.libchrist.com/other/homosexual/sodom.html

 
Originally posted by: GagHalfrunt
Originally posted by: meltdown75
Originally posted by: GagHalfrunt
Originally posted by: mercanucaribe
Why can Bible beaters pick and choose what they want to follow literally?

Because it's the only way the can justify following their fairy tales. Most of Christianity is an abomination against mankind. The atrocities mandated by the Bible make radical Islam look like Barney singing a song for kids. But since weak-minded fools want to believe in eternal paradise they just filter out the parts of the religion they don't like. They are no REAL Christians on earth, there are just millions of poseurs who have chosen one belief from column A, 2 beliefs from colum B and managed to convince themselves that what they WANT to do is really what God expects them to do.
...and the most petty, worthless, spiteful, hateful vile creatures of all are those that are not happy enough to simply believe in nothing at all and keep to themselves, but will continually and incessantly attack the beliefs of others. You are example # A1 in this regard. I hope you're proud of it because you sure do work hard for it.

Nope, making you bible-thumpers look like idiots for picking and choosing your own prejudices and then calling them a religion to justify your hatred of yourselves and others isn't work at all. YOU clowns take care of the hard part, I just point out that none of you actually believe in the bible, only in the parts of it that reinforce your own beliefs.
For the tenth time, I'm not a bible thumper, you sack of ******.
 
Originally posted by: Garth
It is worth noting that preconceived ideologies have contorted the translations of the original epistles as they appear in the versions of the Bible popular today.

Those were funny. Thanks.
 
Originally posted by: Garth
It is worth noting that preconceived ideologies have contorted the translations of the original epistles as they appear in the versions of the Bible popular today.

Originally posted by: engineereeyore
Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem
Where was it condemned? I have never read it so I know very little about verses and passages and what not.

Romans 1:27 : And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.
http://www.lionking.org/~kovu/bible/section04.html


1 Cor. 6:9 : Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,
http://www.lionking.org/~kovu/bible/section07.html

Jude 1:7 : Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.

Homosexuality was practiced in Sodom and Gomorrha and is one of the act condemned in the verse in Jude (Gen. 19:5).
http://www.libchrist.com/other/homosexual/sodom.html



And I suppose Leviticus ch 15 & 18 arent speaking about sexual morality either?
 
Originally posted by: engineereeyore
Originally posted by: Garth
It is worth noting that preconceived ideologies have contorted the translations of the original epistles as they appear in the versions of the Bible popular today.

Those were funny. Thanks.

We can debate the merits of those interpretations if you want. I was merely offering a different perspective for Zysoclapelm and leaving it to him to make up his own mind.
 
Originally posted by: Garth
Originally posted by: engineereeyore
Originally posted by: Garth
It is worth noting that preconceived ideologies have contorted the translations of the original epistles as they appear in the versions of the Bible popular today.

Those were funny. Thanks.

We can debate the merits of those interpretations if you want. I was merely offering a different perspective for Zysoclapelm and leaving it to him to make up his own mind.

That's fine. I was merely commenting that I thought they were funny. As you said, Zysoclapelm can make up his own mind.
 
Originally posted by: Spartan Niner
Quotes taken out of historical and literary context are just stupid. I could probably selectively quote from the U.S. Constitution to make some dicey comments...

"After all, I just proved that women aren't allowed to speak in church, if you rape someone you have to marry them, and virgins are booty. Because it says so in the bible."

Context:
1. Paul's reprimand to one particular church which had issues with women disrupting worship
2. Jewish law from old, old times
3. I'm not even going to comment about selective quoting.

"the entire bible (old and new testament) are full of modifications. who knows what's in there is correct or not"

You know what? I'm a Biological Anthropology major and the evolutionary tree has been modified more times than I can count on my fingers and toes. Currently, the consensus is that we are NOT descended from apes, chimps or orangutans, and we diverged from a common ancestor ~5-6 million years ago as hominins. I find it amusing that many people have such "faith" in evolutionary theory. If Christians changed their views so drastically all the time...

Oh, and let me re-emphasize this point: According to evolutionary theory, we are NOT descended from apes, chimps, orangutans, and CERTAINLY not monkeys. My criticisms go both to proponents of evolution who have no bloody idea what they're talking about and to fundamentalist Christians who give the rest of us a bad name for their ignorance and overly-literal interpretation (can you even call it interpretation, when you take it at face value?) of the Bible.

*Leaves and puts flame-retardant firewall on his internet connection*
Um... anyone who actually understands evolutionary theory would know that we didn't come from ape but that man and ape had a common ancestor. This was pretty much established since Darwin.

And scientists never, NEVER, claim to know the absolute truth. Science is an ever evolving process to establish a coherent view of the world with adequate predictive ability. Religion claims to have THE truth. Theres no theory of the virgin birth or hypothesis of the resurrection. There is only absolute fact, so as you can imagine it makes me a little wary when people are willing cast Galileo as a heretic in one era will turn a round and say "oh yeah, oops, looks like we 'read the bible wrong' " in another.
 
Originally posted by: mercanucaribe
Originally posted by: Spartan Niner
Quotes taken out of historical and literary context are just stupid. I could probably selectively quote from the U.S. Constitution to make some dicey comments...

"After all, I just proved that women aren't allowed to speak in church, if you rape someone you have to marry them, and virgins are booty. Because it says so in the bible."

Context:
1. Paul's reprimand to one particular church which had issues with women disrupting worship
2. Jewish law from old, old times
3. I'm not even going to comment about selective quoting.

"the entire bible (old and new testament) are full of modifications. who knows what's in there is correct or not"

You know what? I'm a Biological Anthropology major and the evolutionary tree has been modified more times than I can count on my fingers and toes. Currently, the consensus is that we are NOT descended from apes, chimps or orangutans, and we diverged from a common ancestor ~5-6 million years ago as hominins. I find it amusing that many people have such "faith" in evolutionary theory. If Christians changed their views so drastically all the time...

Oh, and let me re-emphasize this point: According to evolutionary theory, we are NOT descended from apes, chimps, orangutans, and CERTAINLY not monkeys. My criticisms go both to proponents of evolution who have no bloody idea what they're talking about and to fundamentalist Christians who give the rest of us a bad name for their ignorance and overly-literal interpretation (can you even call it interpretation, when you take it at face value?) of the Bible.

*Leaves and puts flame-retardant firewall on his internet connection*

Are you sure you aren't going for a BS in Creation of Straw Apes For The Sake of Being Contrary?

I don't view evolution and religion as mutually exclusive or contrary; rather, I view them as two sides of the same coin. One is man's best attempt to explain our origins and the other is God's proclamation that He is Creator - but nowhere in the Bible does it say that evolution or instant creation is the correct explanation - the actual methods of creation and timeline is ambiguous. Thus for me whether evolution or creationism is correct is irrelevant to my faith, because all that matters is I believe it was God's hand at work. My personal opinion doesn't matter.

The arguments above would be a straw man (or ape, as you humorously put it) if it didn't reflect the actual ignorance of many would-be proponents of evolution. The criticism about not understanding the concept of a common ancestor applies both to Fundies AND to the previously mentioned ignorants (although certainly Fundies are a prime target because of their humorously irrational insistence on adhering to strictly literal interpretation). While Biology and Bio-anthro majors certainly don't make this common mistake, I see/hear it all the time with those less educated in the life sciences/anthropology disciplines. Referring to apes as our ancestors is an ignorant and immediately inflammatory thing to do...

My main criticism was still that people who "believe" (not just intellectually) in evolution are taking a leap of "faith" - the same thing they hypocritically accuse Christians of doing. Hypocrisy goes both ways, and I've yet to see someone who hasn't acted hypocritically at some point. Same goes for sin - we're all sinners and if some Christian is acting like s/he is perfect do him/her a favor and tell them they're sinners as well. The difference of course is that Christians are supposed to have renounced their sinful ways and earnestly try to follow the teachings of Jesus in reforming their lives. Some of them certainly don't fit that description and are rightly called hypocrites. Fundies view their churches as fortresses against the "evil" world. I view churches as hospitals for the sick.
 
Originally posted by: Mo0o
Um... anyone who actually understands evolutionary theory would know that we didn't come from ape but that man and ape had a common ancestor. This was pretty much established since Darwin.

And scientists never, NEVER, claim to know the absolute truth. Science is an ever evolving process to establish a coherent view of the world with adequate predictive ability. Religion claims to have THE truth. Theres no theory of the virgin birth or hypothesis of the resurrection. There is only absolute fact, so as you can imagine it makes me a little wary when people are willing cast Galileo as a heretic in one era will turn a round and say "oh yeah, oops, looks like we 'read the bible wrong' " in another.

That's exactly the point I was making - those of us well-educated in the scientific disciplines will certainly not make this mistake. But we're not that significant a percentage in the general population. I don't know if a survey on evolutionary understanding has been done, but I would bet that 9/10 Americans wouldn't "pass the test".

I'm not talking about scientists making ignorant statements. I'm talking about the average American.
 
West Wing was awesome. I just have the last 4 eps to watch. I loved the episode where Martin Sheen was like "GTFO of my house" to those Christian extremes. I think it was more like

Them: "We know the way to the door"
Sheen: "Find it fast"
 
Zysoclaplem is the most righteous person in this entire thread. When he found something he didn't know, he didn't pretend to know, but tried to learn so that he will know. Rather than spouting venom on a subject he didn't understand and putting words in other people's mouths. Zyso, feel free to PM me if you want help with the Bible.

Most or all of the questions asked here can be answered, but not in a format like this. The thread moves too quickly and is too full of self-righteous hate. Just because somebody doesn't answer a question here doesn't mean it can't be answered, or hasn't been answered many times in other places people would find if they actually wanted the answer.

Oh, and all those quotes in the OP are in the Bible, but Sheen's character has no understanding of them. Like most people. You think that since I know pi to 15 decimal places, I'm a mathematician? I know what HEAT, PIVADS, SDI, AMRAAM, SAW, AWOL, HDUAP, HMMWV, and AWACS stand for- am I a soldier? I can memorize that speech in the OP and say it in front of people- does that make me an actor? Just because he can rattle off verses and mock them doesn't mean he has wisdom.
 
Back
Top