• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Arcanum: *ARAFAT PUTS FORWARD HIS PEACE PROPOSALS FOR AMERICA!*

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
But what is at issue here is how people think they have a right to kick somebody off of Anandtech because he's posting stuff that they don't like to read (note how Scipionix responded exactly 1 minute after the original post.... there's no way he could have read the post in that time, yet he still jumps in and calls him an idiot/troll/blah blah blah.) The tyranny of the majority around here is terribly strong... people just gang up and start bashing anyone who doesn't go with the party line.

I think that this was a good post with a good point.... even though it's obviously fake, I think that the idea of Arafat turning Bush's own words back around against him, showing what a hypocrite he is, is great.
 
You didnt get what czar wrote he wasnt backing up what KAMAZON said but rather made an intreging observation.
Actually, I did get what Czar wrote. In fact, I agree with what Czar wrote: the US is rather hypocritical in this area. The thing is, what Kamazon wrote is unsubstantiated rumor, and I was trying to point that out to Czar.

Rob
 
Originally posted by: bizmark
But what is at issue here is how people think they have a right to kick somebody off of Anandtech because he's posting stuff that they don't like to read (note how Scipionix responded exactly 1 minute after the original post.... there's no way he could have read the post in that time, yet he still jumps in and calls him an idiot/troll/blah blah blah.) The tyranny of the majority around here is terribly strong... people just gang up and start bashing anyone who doesn't go with the party line.

I think that this was a good post with a good point.... even though it's obviously fake, I think that the idea of Arafat turning Bush's own words back around against him, showing what a hypocrite he is, is great.

UM? I can't believe someone is defending this loser.

If he would have wanted to get a point across that he is a hypocrite (which he isnt) he would have bluntly asked about a what if situation. Not trying to state unfactual facts.
 
Originally posted by: bizmark
But what is at issue here is how people think they have a right to kick somebody off of Anandtech because he's posting stuff that they don't like to read (note how Scipionix responded exactly 1 minute after the original post.... there's no way he could have read the post in that time, yet he still jumps in and calls him an idiot/troll/blah blah blah.) The tyranny of the majority around here is terribly strong... people just gang up and start bashing anyone who doesn't go with the party line.

I think that this was a good post with a good point.... even though it's obviously fake, I think that the idea of Arafat turning Bush's own words back around against him, showing what a hypocrite he is, is great.

So, this was also part of the "good post" then?


Hey sheep, didja hear that 5 of the alleged suspects of Sept. 11th were actually dead years ago, and 7 others are still alive and living in Saudia Arabia who are suing the FBI for STILL having their pictures up as the highjackers? LOL I'm refering to your dumbass quote by the way. Yea lets see you wiggle out of this one with something equally stupid as 'oh you're just a Nazi'.

Not only untrue, he also refers to the members as sheep, dumbasses, and Nazis..................
rolleye.gif


What YOU'RE not seeing is that everything he posts is nothing but an atempt to initiate a flame war...............🙁
 
According to your profile, you live in California. As much as you may hate America and its ignorant population, somehow we've been able to ensure enough freedom that you can get the fvck out whenever you'd like.
 
Originally posted by: bizmark
But what is at issue here is how people think they have a right to kick somebody off of Anandtech because he's posting stuff that they don't like to read (note how Scipionix responded exactly 1 minute after the original post.... there's no way he could have read the post in that time, yet he still jumps in and calls him an idiot/troll/blah blah blah.) The tyranny of the majority around here is terribly strong... people just gang up and start bashing anyone who doesn't go with the party line.

I think that this was a good post with a good point.... even though it's obviously fake, I think that the idea of Arafat turning Bush's own words back around against him, showing what a hypocrite he is, is great.


LOL I like to laugh at the general population to see how truely insane some people are, it's rather fun. Now obviously if any of these 'counter intellegence expert' dolts who are so quick to criticize that this is fake IT'S OBVIOUS! THATS THE WHOLE POINT! They didn't even read the last paragraph where I even bring it up.

However through humor it does release a certain Irony, but you actually have to spend 3 minutes to read it all. I know it's hard for video game trained generation it's hard to do that tho.
 
Originally posted by: bizmark
But what is at issue here is how people think they have a right to kick somebody off of Anandtech because he's posting stuff that they don't like to read (note how Scipionix responded exactly 1 minute after the original post.... there's no way he could have read the post in that time, yet he still jumps in and calls him an idiot/troll/blah blah blah.) The tyranny of the majority around here is terribly strong... people just gang up and start bashing anyone who doesn't go with the party line.

I think that this was a good post with a good point.... even though it's obviously fake, I think that the idea of Arafat turning Bush's own words back around against him, showing what a hypocrite he is, is great.
no, czar disagrees with us all the time but we like him because he posts links and is rather well reasoned and doesn't call people dolts, sheep, and nazis.

 
Originally posted by: KAMAZON

LOL I like to laugh at the general population to see how truely insane some people are, it's rather fun. Now obviously if any of these 'counter intellegence expert' dolts who are so quick to criticize that this is fake IT'S OBVIOUS! THATS THE WHOLE POINT! They didn't even read the last paragraph where I even bring it up.

However through humor it does release a certain Irony, but you actually have to spend 3 minutes to read it all. I know it's hard for video game trained generation it's hard to do that tho.

KAMAZON, you're spewing out s*** faster than a fat woman at an all you can eat Mexican buffet.

 
Thank god I'm in the video game generation because I would hate to be even remotely related to you.

Okay I have a proposal kinda like the word nef can we make the word kamazon to mean someone who states a lie as a fact.
 
Originally posted by: ToBeMe

So, this was also part of the "good post" then?

I was referring to the original post only. I'm not really trying to defend Kamazon, but more what he said and his right/ability to say it.

What YOU'RE not seeing is that everything he posts is nothing but an atempt to initiate a flame war...............🙁

As far as this thread goes, he posted something that was decidedly inflammatory, but he didn't start flaming anyone until he was flamed first.

I think that inflammatory statements are great, and I think that ATOT would be soul-less without them. People need to have spirited debate and good arguments. What, do we want to turn this forum into a great big love-fest where nobody disagrees with anybody, or any disagreement is so minor that it is essentially pointless? We all need to realize that there are many, many points of view in the world, some of them decidedly different from ours, and that to quash these viewpoints is to disregard someone else's value as a human being.

I know that just sounded like a bunch of lovey-dovey liberal bullsh!t, but I'm trying to appeal to a greater sense of right and wrong, and words are failing me, so it comes out like a bunch of drivel. So I'll just end with the quote from whoever it was, "I may disagree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."
 
Originally posted by: no0b
Thank god I'm in the video game generation because I would hate to be even remotely related to you.

Okay I have a proposal kinda like the word nef can we make the word kamazon to mean someone who states a lie as a fact.

I second your proposal
 
I actually thought the original post was relatively clever, in spite of the fact that KAMAZON is a nut and a troll. I viewed it more as comedy than anything - I do not myself regard President Bush's middle east policy as hypocritical - but it was not bad on its face.
 
Oh, by the way, I agree with bizmark. As stupid as KAMAZON can be, I dont think we should tell him to leave yet. Sure, he has been a little annoying (Ive seen him at HardForums for a while now), but he has a right to voice his opinion. So far it hasnt really been destructive.
 
Originally posted by: ToBeMe
Originally posted by: bizmark
But what is at issue here is how people think they have a right to kick somebody off of Anandtech because he's posting stuff that they don't like to read (note how Scipionix responded exactly 1 minute after the original post.... there's no way he could have read the post in that time, yet he still jumps in and calls him an idiot/troll/blah blah blah.) The tyranny of the majority around here is terribly strong... people just gang up and start bashing anyone who doesn't go with the party line.

I think that this was a good post with a good point.... even though it's obviously fake, I think that the idea of Arafat turning Bush's own words back around against him, showing what a hypocrite he is, is great.

So, this was also part of the "good post" then?


Hey sheep, didja hear that 5 of the alleged suspects of Sept. 11th were actually dead years ago, and 7 others are still alive and living in Saudia Arabia who are suing the FBI for STILL having their pictures up as the highjackers? LOL I'm refering to your dumbass quote by the way. Yea lets see you wiggle out of this one with something equally stupid as 'oh you're just a Nazi'.

Not only untrue, he also refers to the members as sheep, dumbasses, and Nazis..................
rolleye.gif



What YOU'RE not seeing is that everything he posts is nothing but an atempt to initiate a flame war...............🙁

THIS is exactly what I was told 1 miintue after posting this:

It's not my policy to do ad hominem arguments, but in this case, you're an idiot.

-------------------------
Big Black 'Wood

On September 11, 2001, 19 Arab, Muslim, non-citizen men killed 3,000 Americans. Don't forget it.



LOOK AT HIS QUOTE. It is NOT TRUE. HE IS JUST GOING WITH THE PARTY LINE LIKE A SHEEP! 7 out of the alleged terrorists are still alive, 5 were dead before sept. 11th and their still on te h FBIs website and the FBI as a result has a lawsuit pending against it by the people who'se pictuers are up at the terrorists.

I call Sharon a Nazi as he is a self admitted 'Judeo-Nazi' somene who calls themself a judeo nazi and studies nazi tactics and was trained by a facist (vladamir jabonitsky) who the prime minister of Israel called 'vladamir hitler' becuase he offerd to support hitler as late as 1941 if hitler w ould drop teh anti-semitism IS A NAZI. By every objective standard of the word, Sharon is a FAcist, which is no different than a nazi (with minor technicalities like who they hate, give sharon 11 years of dictatorship, you'll have a hitler). So then why can't I call him a nazi, he seems to enjoy it when he calls himself that.
 
Originally posted by: LordSegan
Oh, by the way, I agree with bizmark. As stupid as KAMAZON can be, I dont think we should tell him to leave yet. Sure, he has been a little annoying (Ive seen him at HardForums for a while now), but he has a right to voice his opinion. So far it hasnt really been destructive.

Actually it has its been a waste of bandwidth. 😉
 
Originally posted by: LordSegan
Oh, by the way, I agree with bizmark. As stupid as KAMAZON can be, I dont think we should tell him to leave yet. Sure, he has been a little annoying (Ive seen him at HardForums for a while now), but he has a right to voice his opinion. So far it hasnt really been destructive.

nor productive.
 
7 out of the alleged terrorists are still alive, 5 were dead before sept. 11th and their still on te h FBIs website and the FBI as a result has a lawsuit pending against it by the people who'se pictuers are up at the terrorists.
Everything else you've posted has been self-admittedly false.

Can you back that claim up?

Rob
 
Originally posted by: Don_Vito
I actually thought the original post was relatively clever, in spite of the fact that KAMAZON is a nut and a troll. I viewed it more as comedy than anything - I do not myself regard President Bush's middle east policy as hypocritical - but it was not bad on its face.

well Don Vito, I'm glad we agree on something (except replace KAMAZON with Don VIto and we'll agree 100%).
 
Originally posted by: ElFenix
no, czar disagrees with us all the time but we like him because he posts links and is rather well reasoned and doesn't call people dolts, sheep, and nazis.

Good point.... I agree, more civil language would definitely be more in Kamazon's interests.... I guess there comes a point where you've just completely alienated everybody, and I guess Kamazon's crossed it. Oh well.
 
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: bizmark
But what is at issue here is how people think they have a right to kick somebody off of Anandtech because he's posting stuff that they don't like to read (note how Scipionix responded exactly 1 minute after the original post.... there's no way he could have read the post in that time, yet he still jumps in and calls him an idiot/troll/blah blah blah.) The tyranny of the majority around here is terribly strong... people just gang up and start bashing anyone who doesn't go with the party line.

I think that this was a good post with a good point.... even though it's obviously fake, I think that the idea of Arafat turning Bush's own words back around against him, showing what a hypocrite he is, is great.
no, czar disagrees with us all the time but we like him because he posts links and is rather well reasoned and doesn't call people dolts, sheep, and nazis.
Plenty of people disagree with me, and I accept that. However, I can only accept those that I can have an intelligent discussion with (Czar, Red Dawn, jjsole etc.). People who feel they must throw around baseless and completely untrue inflammatory statement just to get the attention they so desperately crave, do not belong in a place where normal people discuss things. Im not trying to get rid of him because he doesnt agree with me, or because I feel "overmatched" by him in any shape or form, just that all his posts are an attempt to bait normal thinking people into giving him and his LaRouchies the attention they feel they need.

 
I call Sharon a Nazi as he is a self admitted 'Judeo-Nazi' somene who calls themself a judeo nazi and studies nazi tactics and was trained by a facist (vladamir jabonitsky) who the prime minister of Israel called 'vladamir hitler' becuase he offerd to support hitler as late as 1941 if hitler w ould drop teh anti-semitism IS A NAZI. By every objective standard of the word, Sharon is a FAcist, which is no different than a nazi (with minor technicalities like who they hate, give sharon 11 years of dictatorship, you'll have a hitler). So then why can't I call him a nazi, he seems to enjoy it when he calls himself that.


are you trying to dig yourself a hole? so what if the jews called up hitler and asked him to stop it with the anti semitism. thats only reasonable. and guess who ended up throwing their lot in with the nazis in the end? yes the palestinians.


whos the nazi now eh?
 
Originally posted by: KAMAZON


-------------------------
Big Black 'Wood

On September 11, 2001, 19 Arab, Muslim, non-citizen men killed 3,000 Americans. Don't forget it.



LOOK AT HIS QUOTE. It is NOT TRUE. HE IS JUST GOING WITH THE PARTY LINE LIKE A SHEEP! 7 out of the alleged terrorists are still alive, 5 were dead before sept. 11th and their still on te h FBIs website and the FBI as a result has a lawsuit pending against it by the people who'se pictuers are up at the terrorists.
link?
 
Originally posted by: bizmark
But what is at issue here is how people think they have a right to kick somebody off of Anandtech because he's posting stuff that they don't like to read (note how Scipionix responded exactly 1 minute after the original post.... there's no way he could have read the post in that time, yet he still jumps in and calls him an idiot/troll/blah blah blah.) The tyranny of the majority around here is terribly strong... people just gang up and start bashing anyone who doesn't go with the party line.
Actually I didn't need to read the whole thing beacuse 90% of it was a ripoff. I also forgot that liberals are so self-righteous and thin-skinned that if anyone criticizes them, it's a violation of their First Amendment rights and "tyranny of the majority." If you get run off the board because people call you an idiot, that's your problem for being a completely spineless wuss with no facts and no point.
 
Originally posted by: Entity
7 out of the alleged terrorists are still alive, 5 were dead before sept. 11th and their still on te h FBIs website and the FBI as a result has a lawsuit pending against it by the people who'se pictuers are up at the terrorists.
Everything else you've posted has been self-admittedly false.

Can you back that claim up?

Rob

No that is not true, only this post as a ARCANA, you know a JOKE, I mean it says it in the title and the end, actually most of whats in it is true, just the fact that arafat didn't say it. As far as my claim SURE of the 5 daed terrorists and 7 live ones, sure!

I *HATE* posting the washington post. it is one of the biggest propoganda garbage publications, but they did cover partially this story and the FBI had to admit it:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/w...ode=&contentId=A59320-2001Sep19&notFound=true

The Salon covered it
http://www.salon.com/tech/feature/2001/10/02/identity_theft/print.html

And the British Daily Telegraph:
http://www.portal.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2001/09/23/widen23.xml


The men - all from Saudi Arabia - spoke of their shock at being mistakenly named by the FBI as suicide terrorists. None of the four was in the United States on September 11 and all are alive in their home country. The truth is we don't know who did it!!!!!



 
Back
Top