- Feb 17, 2002
- 4,723
- 80
- 91
Am I the only one who thinks that plastic is a superior material over aluminium for mobile devices? Plastic doesn't scratch as easily. Plastic does not dent. Plastic doesn't get as hot. Yet Apple insists on building the inferior version of their product into the plastic housing. So what are the pros and cons of the iPhone 5C? I can only hope that it would be more durable. So, besides price (which is negligible over 2 years, less than 5%), I'm assuming this is the only potential advantage the 5C offers.
So let's talk about Apple's plastic products. Historically, plastic mobile devices were never put in cases. Remember the flip phones? And what about the classic smart phones, like Palm Treo? None of those were ever typically put in cases because they were already durable and rugged to begin with. But then Apple came out with the iPod. My first iPod was the 30 GB iPod Video in black. I remember taking it out if the box and putting it in my pocket, then taking it back out and BAM, the entire thing had scratches all over it. The market for cases exploded because you were FORCED to use a case if you wanted to take care of your product. And keep in mind, folks, the iPods of yesteryear were plastic, not glass. In the front, anyway... I'm ignoring the rear.
Other plastic apple products include the original iMac, where the plastic chassis was too weak to hold the CRT monitor and it would sag, effectively breaking the optical drive. Then you have the iBooks that would overheat and discolor, in addition to being prone to scratching. Then you have the MacBooks that would discolor at the palm rest, also being prone to scratching. Apple just doesn't seem to be able to make good plastic products.
Let's look at some competing products. ThinkPads are mainly plastic, yet they're renown for their durability. Nokia phones are plastic and are renown for their durability. Zune, although a failure, was the same. You never saw these products in cases because they just didn't need it.
So what about this iPhone 5C? It's more than likely going to get all scratched and chipped and otherwise ruined just as easily as all of Apple's other plastic products. So you'll need a case anyway. So the need for a case negates the advantage of it being made out of plastic. It even negates the advantage of picking the device color, since cases can be colored and you'll need a case anyway. So the only thing left is price. Over two years, you will save roughly 5% with an iPhone 5C versus an iPhone 5S.
Do you think paying 5% more over 2 years is worth the superior phone? I do. So what's the point of the iPhone 5C? I just don't see it.
So let's talk about Apple's plastic products. Historically, plastic mobile devices were never put in cases. Remember the flip phones? And what about the classic smart phones, like Palm Treo? None of those were ever typically put in cases because they were already durable and rugged to begin with. But then Apple came out with the iPod. My first iPod was the 30 GB iPod Video in black. I remember taking it out if the box and putting it in my pocket, then taking it back out and BAM, the entire thing had scratches all over it. The market for cases exploded because you were FORCED to use a case if you wanted to take care of your product. And keep in mind, folks, the iPods of yesteryear were plastic, not glass. In the front, anyway... I'm ignoring the rear.
Other plastic apple products include the original iMac, where the plastic chassis was too weak to hold the CRT monitor and it would sag, effectively breaking the optical drive. Then you have the iBooks that would overheat and discolor, in addition to being prone to scratching. Then you have the MacBooks that would discolor at the palm rest, also being prone to scratching. Apple just doesn't seem to be able to make good plastic products.
Let's look at some competing products. ThinkPads are mainly plastic, yet they're renown for their durability. Nokia phones are plastic and are renown for their durability. Zune, although a failure, was the same. You never saw these products in cases because they just didn't need it.
So what about this iPhone 5C? It's more than likely going to get all scratched and chipped and otherwise ruined just as easily as all of Apple's other plastic products. So you'll need a case anyway. So the need for a case negates the advantage of it being made out of plastic. It even negates the advantage of picking the device color, since cases can be colored and you'll need a case anyway. So the only thing left is price. Over two years, you will save roughly 5% with an iPhone 5C versus an iPhone 5S.
Do you think paying 5% more over 2 years is worth the superior phone? I do. So what's the point of the iPhone 5C? I just don't see it.
Last edited: