BD231
Lifer
- Feb 26, 2001
 
- 10,568
 
- 138
 
- 106
 
Dell also wasn't able to move their entire lineup to AMD. They would if AMD had the warehouse capacity but AMD just can't operate like that.
Dell has been an Intel VIP customer since I was downing breast milk. I've never seen Dell harbor the thought of AMD besting Intel, either. At best, dell put themselves in better position to take advantage of AMD's offerings should any noteworthy piece of silicon steal the show. But that's just my take on the Dell/AMD shenanigans. For all the advertising Dell dose, they didn't try very hard to push AMD on anyone.
One thing I've certainly seen Dell do is complain about pricing.
Leverage with Intel on pricing was more likely then, and it's probably more likely now with the MacBook. Intel has been known to charge heavily for performance that can't be matched and MacBooks are using Core processor's pretty much exclusively at this point.
I think what we have here is history repeating itself. In the world of Mac less processing power used to be the norm, so if Mac decides to cut corners going AMD it could certainly be a gainful opportunity for them. Probably more so than dell could (would) ever make of it through marketing alone.
We're talking about the makers of the IMac here, Mac can sell anything and they do.
In any case I doubt we'd see that cost reduction returned to the customer, Macs have not been value oriented since the Power PC days.
				
		
			