Apple fans might find this interesting

[SAWYER]

http://img2.imageshack.us/gal.php?g=img17373499994.jpg

 

[TehMac]

Interesting stuff. Looks like Apple is all retro n shit. :thumbsup:

 

[RESmonkey]

hmm...think different

 

[The Boston Dangler]

i'm stunned. why is apple allowed to get away with this?

 

[RESmonkey]

Originally posted by: The Boston Dangler
i'm stunned. why is apple allowed to get away with this?

because think different.

 

[ShotgunSteven]

Originally posted by: The Boston Dangler
i'm stunned. why is apple allowed to get away with this?

Perhaps because they haven't been forced to take TARP money from the government? 😉

 

[LtPage1]

Originally posted by: The Boston Dangler
i'm stunned. why is apple allowed to get away with this?

It's not like they're identical. And there's no argument to be made that an iMac is stealing sales from a decades-old speaker system.

Here's an interesting article about Jonathan Ive, the head of Apple's design team, that this reminded me of.

 

[aphex]

http://gizmodo.com/343641/1960...crets-to-apples-future

 

[coldmeat]

I can see the similarities in the iPod design, but the iMac looks no more like that tv than any other monitor, and the same with the Power Mac.

 

[edro]

The iPod is the only one that is even close.

 

[The Boston Dangler]

Originally posted by: ShotgunSteven

Originally posted by: The Boston Dangler
i'm stunned. why is apple allowed to get away with this?

Perhaps because they haven't been forced to take TARP money from the government? 😉

i don't know what that means 😕

edit:
i means what i thought it meant

 

[The Boston Dangler]

Originally posted by: edro
The iPod is the only one that is even close.

that's way more than apple needs to successfully litigate against anyone else.

 

[zinfamous]

this is supposed to be some kind of evidence fr derivative design?

weaksauce. strong weaksauce here....