I've been looking over the the issue because the Dailytech article is sensationalist to be honest. There is a decided lack of source in their claims except for the one quote so I did a little digging.
Seems Apple is arguing that it is unfair, and likely against the law, for Samsung and Motorola to use FRAND patents in a counterclaim against Apple. You can sue someone for refusing to license FRAND patents if they use it in their products but you can't use it offensively or defensively in other words. Once you commit your patents to FRAND (and Apple does have some FRAND patents) you can't turn around in a patent dispute and use it as a weapon. You can still use patents you own that are not under FRAND to sue or countersue someone. And Apple's lawyers are not complaining about the non-FRAND patents, only the FRAND ones.
This is not an argument for or against the validity of Apple's patents nor am I condoning Apple's behavior. I'm just saying that I don't agree with using FRAND patents in a patent war.
Here's
some further reading.