This latter phrase was not simply added for effect. Part of the process of corporatizing education through the philosophy of administrators currently running Americas colleges has been the deliberate shrinking or even the killing-off of philosophy and humanities departments in higher education, both at community colleges and four-year colleges, across the nation. This is a well-documented development, but it is not often tied to the philosophy behind it.
But in brief, one cannot be a critical thinker, or engage in deepening ones knowledge of human ideas or cultural development, if one is to be an employee of an American business.
The corporate philosophy which is killing such programs does so primarily for two reasons: 1) such education does not have a monetary payback for the business world; 2) critical thinkers and those with knowledge are dangerous to corporate hegemony. (Former CEOs have told me this directly, although not in these terms.)
For more evidence of the corporate philosophy that has infiltrated and changed college education, over-and-above this reading and writing and job training focus, note how the corporate bottom line mentality now prevails in administrative decisions concerning which courses and majors are maintained. For one example, in every college course now, there must be a pre-determined measureable outcome of student successthe latter defined as the numbers of students who pass the coursethat justifies the retention of the course and/or its instructor.
The goals are called Student Learning Outcomes, and the vocabulary of each such outcome must be specifically formulated in such a way that an examining administrator can quantify the successful outcomes by how many students pass the objective and then pass the course.
Aside from the obvious fact that the education process cannot be so quantifiedthat there are significant elements of education that are qualitative in nature, such as expanding the students intellectual horizon, whether they pass the objective or the course or notthis downward pressure from the institutional custodians now in control of the education system results directly in grade-inflation and also in reduction in emphasis on content, the latter of which is certainly a part of the definition of higher education.
Now, instead of focusing on students learning content, deepening their understanding of themselves and their societies, and developing a self-conscious worldview, college education is being measured strictly by its outcome in terms of total numbers of successful students.