Nothingness
Diamond Member
- Jul 3, 2013
- 3,287
- 2,345
- 136
Any hardware news site has this it seemsIs there a news site where you are getting this?
Any hardware news site has this it seemsIs there a news site where you are getting this?
We shall see, but they said "up to 90% faster" so we don't know what that means for Geekbench 4. If 90% faster for GB4 then yeah, it could hit as high as 18000 multi-core.So that makes it ~5250 SC / ~17500 MC @GB4 then?
What a beast. Here's hoping it gets 6gb of ram, but doubt it.
I'm keeping my two Air 2 units. One I bought 4 years ago, and one 3 years ago. Work fine for my needs. Watched the live stream on it in fact. 2.4 GB of cellular data per hour. Ouch!So that makes it ~5250 SC / ~17500 MC @GB4 then?
What a beast. Here's hoping it gets 6gb of ram, but doubt it.
But too fucking expensive. As an Air 2 owner I wanted to upgrade but they jumped the shark.
I'm keeping my two Air 2 units. One I bought 4 years ago, and one 3 years ago. Work fine for my needs. Watched the live stream on it in fact. 2.4 GB of cellular data per hour. Ouch!
Somehow 17500 multi-core for Geekbench 4 seems far too optimistic, unless Apple has increased the power usage significantly. Even if it hits “just” 15500, that would be remarkable.So that makes it ~5250 SC / ~17500 MC @GB4 then?
What a beast. Here's hoping it gets 6gb of ram, but doubt it.
What Geekbench scores?Based upon Geekbench scores, Big Core clock is presumably 2.8.
What Geekbench scores?
What I'm saying is there is no guarantee that Geekbench single-core score will increase by 35%. If it did that would be impressive, but so far we don't know that because we have no such benchmark results.Just increasing the iPad Pro's score by 35% and comparing that result to the Xs.
Geekbench score increased by 38% from A10 to A12, so 35% for A12X vs A10X definitely looks plausible.What I'm saying is there is no guarantee that Geekbench single-core score will increase by 35%. If it did that would be impressive, but so far we don't know that because we have no such benchmark results.
Apple just said single core scores increased "up to" 35% and multi core score increased "up to" 90%, but made no mention of Geekbench.
Looks like first Geekbench scores are outGeekbench score increased by 38% from A10 to A12, so 35% for A12X vs A10X definitely looks plausible.
CompareHaving compared that result with the A12 iPhone, the frequency of the big core is still the same at 2.5ghz.
The reason for the higher single core score is the memory. Memory bandwidth is basically doubled in the A12X.
This all makes sense since although the iPad is bigger, it is still fan less and is super thin at only 5.9mm - thinner than the iphone.
We shall see, but they said "up to 90% faster" so we don't know what that means for Geekbench 4. If 90% faster for GB4 then yeah, it could hit as high as 18000 multi-core.
Availability is next week, so we will know soon enough.
FWIW, iPad Pro with A10X hits about 9600 multi-core, and iPhone XR with A12 hits well over 11000.
SVE won't make a CPU execute more FP operations. Ignoring the fact SVE enables more vectorization, it's a win because you reduce decode/dispatch bandwidth requirements when your vector length is 256-bit or more. If Apple doesn't add more FP units or doesn't make them wider then SVE won't show a gain on code already vectorized.Like I said, comparable to a 4-core iMac. Intel wins big where AVX can kick in (mainly SGEMM and FFT), otherwise it’s a toss up. Note especially the difference in memory bandwidth (I assume bcs of Intel’s incredibly lame roll-out of DDR4 support).
My guess is by the time Apple releases the ARM Macs (next year?) they’ll have SVE support, matching the one last Intel advantage in AVX.
SVE won't make a CPU execute more FP operations. Ignoring the fact SVE enables more vectorization, it's a win because you reduce decode/dispatch bandwidth requirements when your vector length is 256-bit or more. If Apple doesn't add more FP units or doesn't make them wider then SVE won't show a gain on code already vectorized.