• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Apology thread

Page 15 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Starbuck1975 said:
I read the Atlantic article, and WAPO commentary as well. The full release of the Mueller report does not substantially change what we learned from the more favorable Barr summary. Can we agree that there was no collusion knock out blow, and that obstruction is open to interpretation.
Click to expand...
The only thing that is really open to interpretation is why Congress isn't upholding its Constitutional duties.
 
ivwshane said:
There is no arguing with a "both sides" bitch, bubble dweller. He'll only dig in his heels or mysteriously stop posting until he thinks people forget his ridiculous claims.
Click to expand...
You resort to personal attacks when you can no longer support your argument. It’s quite predictable and tiresome.
 
Vic said:
The only thing that is really open to interpretation is why Congress isn't upholding its Constitutional duties.
Click to expand...
Agreed. The Mueller report is quite clear that Trump lied and also gave unlawful orders. There is adequate grounds for impeachment, and yet the Democrats have been quite assertive in dodging that path.
 
Starbuck1975 said:
Agreed. The Mueller report is quite clear that Trump lied and also gave unlawful orders. There is adequate grounds for impeachment, and yet the Democrats have been quite assertive in dodging that path.
Click to expand...
I suspect they're worried about the constant death threats they're getting from Trump's loyal propaganda-crazed mob.
 
It's funny that the only the supporters of the party of racists, fascists, and assholes, are the only people that argue that both parties are the same.

It's simply true. without question.

Those that claim to be "party to none" and still argue the same, are worse than illiterate. These people are simply willful morons. They are to be laughed at and kicked in the street until unconscious.
 
UberNeuman said:
You may apologize now.
Click to expand...
zinfamous said:
It's funny that the only the supporters of the party of racists, fascists, and assholes, are the only people that argue that both parties are the same.

It's simply true. without question.

Those that claim to be "party to none" and still argue the same, are worse than illiterate. These people are simply willful morons. They are to be laughed at and kicked in the street until unconscious.
Click to expand...
I know the left has a lot to answer for.
 
Starbuck1975 said:
He could certainly try, but Mueller also acknowledges that without underlying proof of collusion, the obstruction charge is tenuous, and Mueller also acknowledges the purview of the executive branch to directs its own resources in defense of itself.

You can set the goal post down over there and then fetch me a cup of water.
Click to expand...

Tell me. Is it your opinion that if the Mueller investigation led to the discovery of a crime against Trump, then he would be guilty of obstruction?
 
Vic said:
The only thing that is really open to interpretation is why Congress isn't upholding its Constitutional duties.
Click to expand...

Well, they're in recess right at the moment, just for starters. It needs to be understood that impeachment by the House will likely not result in removal from office by the GOP Senate. I'm all in favor of making them own it but I'm not prepared to predict what kind of backlash could be conjured up from a failed attempt.
 
CaptainGoodnight said:
The fact they can't accept a democratic election where they don't win.
Click to expand...
Criticizing the President because you disagree with his policies or methods is not undemocratic. Working within the Constitutional and legal systems to check a President's abuses of power (whether real or perceived) is also not undemocratic.
Trying to suppress criticism of a President is undemocratic. Attempting to prevent work within the Constitutional and legal systems to check a President's abuses of power is also undemocratic.
Our democracy isn't a system that gives unlimited power to whoever lost the election. That today's Republicans believe so is probably the greatest threat to America's freedom today. If only because it means that either a Republican dictatorship will be established OR there will a Democrat in the White House again. Maybe not in '20, but someday. And then he'll get to do all the same shit that Trump is getting away with today.
 
Jhhnn said:
Well, they're in recess right at the moment, just for starters. It needs to be understood that impeachment by the House will likely not result in removal from office by the GOP Senate. I'm all in favor of making them own it but I'm not prepared to predict what kind of backlash could be conjured up from a failed attempt.
Click to expand...
Keep the faith.
 
Starbuck1975 said:
You resort to personal attacks when you can no longer support your argument. It’s quite predictable and tiresome.
Click to expand...

I've already supported my argument you dumb bitch and yet you haven't bothered providing anything to back up your claim.

At this point you are just another piece of shit troll.
 
Vic said:
Criticizing the President because you disagree with his policies or methods is not undemocratic. Working within the Constitutional and legal systems to check a President's abuses of power (whether real or perceived) is also not undemocratic.
Trying to suppress criticism of a President is undemocratic.
Click to expand...
Nobody is arguing that. You just don't like who won.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top