AP study finds $1.6B went to bailed-out bank execs

BoomerD

No Lifer
Feb 26, 2006
66,013
14,419
146
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/200..._ge/executive_bailouts

"Banks that are getting taxpayer bailouts awarded their top executives nearly $1.6 billion in salaries, bonuses, and other benefits last year, an Associated Press analysis reveals.

The rewards came even at banks where poor results last year foretold the economic crisis that sent them to Washington for a government rescue. Some trimmed their executive compensation due to lagging bank performance, but still forked over multimillion-dollar executive pay packages.

Benefits included cash bonuses, stock options, personal use of company jets and chauffeurs, home security, country club memberships and professional money management, the AP review of federal securities documents found.

The total amount given to nearly 600 executives would cover bailout costs for many of the 116 banks that have so far accepted tax dollars to boost their bottom lines.

Rep. Barney Frank, chairman of the House Financial Services committee and a long-standing critic of executive largesse, said the bonuses tallied by the AP review amount to a bribe "to get them to do the jobs for which they are well paid in the first place.

"Most of us sign on to do jobs and we do them best we can," said Frank, a Massachusetts Democrat. "We're told that some of the most highly paid people in executive positions are different. They need extra money to be motivated!"

The AP compiled total compensation based on annual reports that the banks file with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The 116 banks have so far received $188 billion in taxpayer help. Among the findings:

_The average paid to each of the banks' top executives was $2.6 million in salary, bonuses and benefits.

_Lloyd Blankfein, president and chief executive officer of Goldman Sachs, took home nearly $54 million in compensation last year. The company's top five executives received a total of $242 million.

This year, Goldman will forgo cash and stock bonuses for its seven top-paid executives. They will work for their base salaries of $600,000, the company said. Facing increasing concern by its own shareholders on executive payments, the company described its pay plan last spring as essential to retain and motivate executives "whose efforts and judgments are vital to our continued success, by setting their compensation at appropriate and competitive levels." Goldman spokesman Ed Canaday declined to comment beyond that written report.

The New York-based company on Dec. 16 reported its first quarterly loss since it went public in 1999. It received $10 billion in taxpayer money on Oct. 28.

_Even where banks cut back on pay, some executives were left with seven- or eight-figure compensation that most people can only dream about. Richard D. Fairbank, the chairman of Capital One Financial Corp., took a $1 million hit in compensation after his company had a disappointing year, but still got $17 million in stock options. The McLean, Va.-based company received $3.56 billion in bailout money on Nov. 14.

_John A. Thain, chief executive officer of Merrill Lynch, topped all corporate bank bosses with $83 million in earnings last year. Thain, a former chief operating officer for Goldman Sachs, took the reins of the company in December 2007, avoiding the blame for a year in which Merrill lost $7.8 billion. Since he began work late in the year, he earned $57,692 in salary, a $15 million signing bonus and an additional $68 million in stock options.

Like Goldman, Merrill got $10 billion from taxpayers on Oct. 28.

The AP review comes amid sharp questions about the banks' commitment to the goals of the Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP), a law designed to buy bad mortgages and other troubled assets. Last month, the Bush administration changed the program's goals, instructing the Treasury Department to pump tax dollars directly into banks in a bid to prevent wholesale economic collapse.

The program set restrictions on some executive compensation for participating banks, but did not limit salaries and bonuses unless they had the effect of encouraging excessive risk to the institution. Banks were barred from giving golden parachutes to departing executives and deducting some executive pay for tax purposes.

Banks that got bailout funds also paid out millions for home security systems, private chauffeured cars, and club dues. Some banks even paid for financial advisers. Wells Fargo of San Francisco, which took $25 billion in taxpayer bailout money, gave its top executives up to $20,000 each to pay personal financial planners.

At Bank of New York Mellon Corp., chief executive Robert P. Kelly's stipend for financial planning services came to $66,748, on top of his $975,000 salary and $7.5 million bonus. His car and driver cost $178,879. Kelly also received $846,000 in relocation expenses, including help selling his home in Pittsburgh and purchasing one in Manhattan, the company said.

Goldman Sachs' tab for leased cars and drivers ran as high as $233,000 per executive. The firm told its shareholders this year that financial counseling and chauffeurs are important in giving executives more time to focus on their jobs.

JPMorgan Chase chairman James Dimon ran up a $211,182 private jet travel tab last year when his family lived in Chicago and he was commuting to New York. The company got $25 billion in bailout funds.

Banks cite security to justify personal use of company aircraft for some executives. But Rep. Brad Sherman, D-Calif., questioned that rationale, saying executives visit many locations more vulnerable than the nation's security-conscious commercial air terminals.

Sherman, a member of the House Financial Services Committee, said pay excesses undermine development of good bank economic policies and promote an escalating pay spiral among competing financial institutions ? something particularly hard to take when banks then ask for rescue money.

He wants them to come before Congress, like the automakers did, and spell out their spending plans for bailout funds.

"The tougher we are on the executives that come to Washington, the fewer will come for a bailout," he said."


This goes beyond "feeding at the public trough," this is pure greed at its finest.

How much more are the taxpayers gonna have to take?

Helping is one thing...paying bonuses with taxpayer money to executives whose companies are losing their asses amounts to rape of the US taxpayer.

I know LK and some of the other corporation-lovers will come in and defend this practice in one way or another, but this kind of blatant greed is indefensible...and should not be tolerated.
 

Slew Foot

Lifer
Sep 22, 2005
12,379
96
86
I think its pretty clear that virtually every dollar of every bailout is going to get flushed down someones toilet.

 

cubby1223

Lifer
May 24, 2004
13,518
42
86
Just further proof that this forum will never "get it" and should put an immediate end to all discussion of the topic.
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
35,485
9,709
136
Originally posted by: Slew Foot
I think its pretty clear that virtually every dollar of every bailout is going to get flushed down someones toilet.

In this case, the OP's complaint is about 0.02% of the $7 trillion spent.
 

jagec

Lifer
Apr 30, 2004
24,442
6
81
Originally posted by: cubby1223
Just further proof that this forum will never "get it" and should put an immediate end to all discussion of the topic.

OK, so the OP isn't proof positive that the majority of the bailout is ill-spent.

However, it clearly indicates that the bank execs will never "get it" and will continue to see public money as their ticket to the good life first, and a huge responsibility to be managed wisely, never.
 

BoomerD

No Lifer
Feb 26, 2006
66,013
14,419
146
Originally posted by: Jaskalas
Originally posted by: Slew Foot
I think its pretty clear that virtually every dollar of every bailout is going to get flushed down someones toilet.

In this case, the OP's complaint is about 0.02% of the $7 trillion spent.

Like I said...it's only money, right?

It isn't the amount...or the percentage of the whole that's troubling. It's that these corporate bottom feeders get away with it in even the smallest way.

"Privatize gain, socialize loss" and never let that interfere with our profits and bonuses...

How the hell a corporation that's losing so much money that it needs the bail-out can justify payin bonuses is beyond me.

Pay bonuses for running a company into the ground?
 

LegendKiller

Lifer
Mar 5, 2001
18,256
68
86
Originally posted by: BoomerD


I know LK and some of the other corporation-lovers will come in and defend this practice in one way or another, but this kind of blatant greed is indefensible...and should not be tolerated.

Are you completely clueless?

I've never defended executive compensation.

In 1980 the average CEO had a compensation package 40x the average salary. Now that's more than 400x.

I'm absolutely disgusted by that.
 

babylon5

Golden Member
Dec 11, 2000
1,363
1
0
Banks got the bailout money from taxpayers, and now they are giving taxpayers the middle finger as to how they are using the money. Got to love the tone of their arrogance.

Banks: F*#` you!




A few of their colorful response:
-----------------------------------------------------------

"We've lent some of it. We've not lent some of it. We've not given any accounting of, 'Here's how we're doing it,'" said Thomas Kelly, a spokesman for JPMorgan Chase, which received $25 billion in emergency bailout money. "We have not disclosed that to the public. We're declining to."

"We're choosing not to disclose that," said Kevin Heine, spokesman for Bank of New York Mellon, which received about $3 billion.

"We're not providing dollar-in, dollar-out tracking," said Barry Koling, a spokesman for Atlanta, Ga.-based SunTrust Banks Inc., which got $3.5 billion in taxpayer dollars.

"We're not sharing any other details. We're just not at this time," said Wendy Walker, a spokeswoman for Dallas-based Comerica Inc., which received $2.25 billion from the government.

Most banks wouldn't say why they were keeping the details secret.
 

Jeff7

Lifer
Jan 4, 2001
41,596
20
81
In other news, sales of KY Jelly and Preparation-H have soared among middle-class taxpayers.

 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
Biggest government payout in history started as a document a couple of pages long, is it a surprise that it's being mismanaged to a legendary degree?
 

trenchfoot

Lifer
Aug 5, 2000
15,660
8,202
136
Bush's going away gift to his pals sure has gotten the economy back on track, just like how Halliburton and Blackwater is winning the war for us in Iraq. Bush just keeps on giving and giving. Too bad he's doing it at the taxpayer's expense.

He must've finally figured out a way to keep the bailout money for the auto industry in the wallets of his executive buddies there and away from the workers on the factory floors too.
 

Chunkee

Lifer
Jul 28, 2002
10,391
1
81
Originally posted by: Jeff7
In other news, sales of KY Jelly and Preparation-H have soared among middle-class taxpayers.

WRONG! This time it is without lube.
 

Sad Clown

Member
Jun 4, 2008
93
0
0
Is anyone really that surprised? The moment they decided to give the money away without any real oversight over how the banks could use it paved the way for abuse of the money.

From what I have heard from friends who are in the market to buy homes, it is still hard as hell getting a home loan despite having great credit and plenty of cash.
 

wetech

Senior member
Jul 16, 2002
871
6
81
Originally posted by: 0marTheZealot
Government money abused by the companies?

I'm shocked, absolutely shocked.

Check your dates again.

"Banks that are getting taxpayer bailouts awarded their top executives nearly $1.6 billion in salaries, bonuses, and other benefits last year, an Associated Press analysis reveals.
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
Originally posted by: Sad Clown
Is anyone really that surprised? The moment they decided to give the money away without any real oversight over how the banks could use it paved the way for abuse of the money.

From what I have heard from friends who are in the market to buy homes, it is still hard as hell getting a home loan despite having great credit and plenty of cash.

wich is way many were against it. eveyrone knew it would be abused.

 

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,562
9
81
Originally posted by: tweaker2
Bush's going away gift to his pals sure has gotten the economy back on track, just like how Halliburton and Blackwater is winning the war for us in Iraq. Bush just keeps on giving and giving. Too bad he's doing it at the taxpayer's expense.

He must've finally figured out a way to keep the bailout money for the auto industry in the wallets of his executive buddies there and away from the workers on the factory floors too.

It's barely a month old and already the revisionists are trying to blame this on Bush.

Do you remember which party rushed the bailout through congress?

Democrats you fucking tool.
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Originally posted by: tweaker2
Bush's going away gift to his pals sure has gotten the economy back on track, just like how Halliburton and Blackwater is winning the war for us in Iraq. Bush just keeps on giving and giving. Too bad he's doing it at the taxpayer's expense.

He must've finally figured out a way to keep the bailout money for the auto industry in the wallets of his executive buddies there and away from the workers on the factory floors too.

It's barely a month old and already the revisionists are trying to blame this on Bush.

Do you remember which party rushed the bailout through congress?

Democrats you fucking tool.

<McMoran>

But they dont hold any power!

</McMoran>

 

SMOGZINN

Lifer
Jun 17, 2005
14,344
4,625
136
Originally posted by: tweaker2
Bush's going away gift to his pals sure has gotten the economy back on track, just like how Halliburton and Blackwater is winning the war for us in Iraq. Bush just keeps on giving and giving. Too bad he's doing it at the taxpayer's expense.

He must've finally figured out a way to keep the bailout money for the auto industry in the wallets of his executive buddies there and away from the workers on the factory floors too.

I'll remind you that Obama fully supported the bailout, and made a big deal of going to congress to vote for it, which should also tell you that Bush doesn't make law. The Democratic Congress does.
 

nonameo

Diamond Member
Mar 13, 2006
5,902
2
76
Really, why would banks loan money right now when they can buy property at dirt cheap prices? Seems like a better investment to me, especially when people are losing their jobs left and right.
 

Slick5150

Diamond Member
Nov 10, 2001
8,760
3
81
And yet we made the auto companies beg and plead to get $14 billion with all sorts of strings attached, and congress still said no because THAT would be irresponsible. Ridiculous.
 

alchemize

Lifer
Mar 24, 2000
11,486
0
0
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Originally posted by: tweaker2
Bush's going away gift to his pals sure has gotten the economy back on track, just like how Halliburton and Blackwater is winning the war for us in Iraq. Bush just keeps on giving and giving. Too bad he's doing it at the taxpayer's expense.

He must've finally figured out a way to keep the bailout money for the auto industry in the wallets of his executive buddies there and away from the workers on the factory floors too.

It's barely a month old and already the revisionists are trying to blame this on Bush.

Do you remember which party rushed the bailout through congress?

Democrats you fucking tool.
They were duped! Duped again by the mad genius Bush!

 

BoomerD

No Lifer
Feb 26, 2006
66,013
14,419
146
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
Originally posted by: BoomerD


I know LK and some of the other corporation-lovers will come in and defend this practice in one way or another, but this kind of blatant greed is indefensible...and should not be tolerated.

Are you completely clueless?

I've never defended executive compensation.

In 1980 the average CEO had a compensation package 40x the average salary. Now that's more than 400x.

I'm absolutely disgusted by that.

Than I misunderstood your stand in a couple of other threads.
My apologies.
 

SP33Demon

Lifer
Jun 22, 2001
27,928
142
106
Before blaming Bush, blame:

a) Fcking moronic Demo-rats in Congress
b) Pssy Repub's in Congress who caved in.
c) Treasury that can bypass Congress (and has) to give out money.