Ideally, if you're a canon shooter, but I'll take opinions across the board. I nearly forgot about this lens, and it would definitely fill the macro void I have now, and probably be better used than an 85/1.8 I wanted to buy again.
The lack of IF and HSM aren't a big deal, my goal with this is strictly something for macro, and the lack of HSM won't be a big deal I think if I want to play w/ portraits.
Given that, any thoughts? Why not a 150 macro? It's giantic. Am I better off w/ the 105, or maybe the canon 100, or 90 (tokina or tamron, I can't remember).
Shooting mostly static items, as I just like random close ups of things. Maybe plants/flowers in nature too. Not aiming at any insect photography.
The lack of IF and HSM aren't a big deal, my goal with this is strictly something for macro, and the lack of HSM won't be a big deal I think if I want to play w/ portraits.
Given that, any thoughts? Why not a 150 macro? It's giantic. Am I better off w/ the 105, or maybe the canon 100, or 90 (tokina or tamron, I can't remember).
Shooting mostly static items, as I just like random close ups of things. Maybe plants/flowers in nature too. Not aiming at any insect photography.
