• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

anyone using a sigma 70 macro?

R

randomlinh

Lifer
Ideally, if you're a canon shooter, but I'll take opinions across the board. I nearly forgot about this lens, and it would definitely fill the macro void I have now, and probably be better used than an 85/1.8 I wanted to buy again.

The lack of IF and HSM aren't a big deal, my goal with this is strictly something for macro, and the lack of HSM won't be a big deal I think if I want to play w/ portraits.

Given that, any thoughts? Why not a 150 macro? It's giantic. Am I better off w/ the 105, or maybe the canon 100, or 90 (tokina or tamron, I can't remember).

Shooting mostly static items, as I just like random close ups of things. Maybe plants/flowers in nature too. Not aiming at any insect photography.
 
The longer the focal length of a macro lens, the longer your working distance, which is the separation between the subject and the front of the lens. This is useful because it lets more light reach the subject, and you don't have to be as close to the subject. The depth of field is shallower, though, and longer focal length lenses are bigger, heavier, and more expensive.
 
70mm is a great focal length for flowers. IIRC, PopPhoto raved about the 70 when it came out last year. I've not heard a single bad thing about it.
 
Originally posted by: soydios
The longer the focal length of a macro lens, the longer your working distance, which is the separation between the subject and the front of the lens. This is useful because it lets more light reach the subject, and you don't have to be as close to the subject. The depth of field is shallower, though, and longer focal length lenses are bigger, heavier, and more expensive.
Click to expand...

yeah, I'm trying to figure out a balance for myself. I actually like the closer working distance, and thought about getting a ring flash, but... yeah, don't want to pay that, haha.

and andy, 20D/40D, with no anticipation of going FF until they are under a grand =) Or at least, a ~1yr old used one goes that low.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top