Originally posted by: vi_edit
I bought a ticket for my Dad the first week of June. It was *supposed* to be a quick 6 hour ride from Omaha, NE to western, IL.
Train was supposed to leave at 5:30AM. We get down there. It's delayed. 6 FREAKING HOURS. So we take him back down at 11:30 and drop him off. He ends up sitting there for close to an hour before the train ends up taking off.
They move about 20 minutes down the rail and come to a stop. And sit there for 45 minutes. Then they move another 40 minutes. And sit for another 30 minutes.
All in all the 6 hour ride that was supposed to get him in at 11:30AM ended up taking over 8.5 hours and got in at 9:30 at night.
He wasn't overly thrilled about the experience to say the least.
did he complain for some sort of partial refund?
Originally posted by: Lorn
It's either pretty good or pretty bad.
The air they use is worse than airplane air - it incredibly stale and has a hint of air-freshener-masked-BO. If you're able to pick your own seat then good. If not, you might get assigned to sit next to some Amish people who REAK. You'd think they might have some natural remedy for the foul stench eminating from their body. Ugh.
It's nice that you're able to go for a walk if you want. There are usually a lot of cars so you could probably fill up some time by just walking front to back. A couple of them will have cars where you can watch movies or look out the huge windows. There might also be a snack car where you can grab some pre-packaged food. The bathrooms are on the lower level so, if you're like me and don't like people watching you walk in to take a dump, you might appreciate that.
I've ridden Amtrak probably 15 times and there have been pretty good times and pretty bad times. Hopefully yours will be a good one.
Originally posted by: NFS4
My grandmother and great uncle came down from Baltimore to visit my folks in Burlington last week on Amtrak. Train was 2 hours late getting into the station. On top of that, they lost my great uncle's luggage. They put it on the 79 train instead of the 89 train (I think) in Washington DC and it ended up going to Georgia or something.
So when they got into the station in Burlington, my great uncle tried to call Amtrak and see if they could find his luggage and have it sent to him. This was last Monday. My dad got a call on Tuesday saying that the bag would be dropped off in Raleigh on Wednesday and he could pick it up from there. This is 45 minutes from Burlington, but my dad works in Cary which is a stones throw from Raleigh anyway.
They say that it will be ready at 9AM wednesday. My dad gets there at 10AM. Bag is not there. The Amtrak train hit a car on the tracks about 200 miles north...WTF??
So my dad goes to work, then comes back at around 1PM on his lunch break to get the luggage. He goes to the front counter and the lady tell his to go in around the corner to the cage in the back and wait for her to come back so that she can find the bag for him. My dad does what she says and goes to the back. At this time, some $6 an hour renta-cop asks my dad what he's doing. My dad tells him that he was told to come back here and wait. Renta-cop tells my dad that he better back up b/c he's about to get arrested. My dad tells him he was just doing as told b/c he was trying to pick up a piece of luggae. Renta-cop tells me dad to step off (at this point my dad is about ready to go postal). At this time, the girl comes back and they start looking for the bag. They look around and my dad sees the bag on the conveyour sp? belt overhead roaming around. The girl says that can't be the bag b/c that is for outgoing baggage. My dad says that IS the bag so she stops the belt and pulls it down. My dad hands her the ticket and they match it up with the tag on the bag. Sure enough, it matches...they had it getting on ANOTHER train!!?? WTF.
Needless to say, Amtrak fvcking sucks.
Originally posted by: NFS4
My grandmother and great uncle came down from Baltimore to visit my folks in Burlington last week on Amtrak. Train was 2 hours late getting into the station. On top of that, they lost my great uncle's luggage. They put it on the 79 train instead of the 89 train (I think) in Washington DC and it ended up going to Georgia or something.
So when they got into the station in Burlington, my great uncle tried to call Amtrak and see if they could find his luggage and have it sent to him. This was last Monday. My dad got a call on Tuesday saying that the bag would be dropped off in Raleigh on Wednesday and he could pick it up from there. This is 45 minutes from Burlington, but my dad works in Cary which is a stones throw from Raleigh anyway.
They say that it will be ready at 9AM wednesday. My dad gets there at 10AM. Bag is not there. The Amtrak train hit a car on the tracks about 200 miles north...WTF??
So my dad goes to work, then comes back at around 1PM on his lunch break to get the luggage. He goes to the front counter and the lady tell his to go in around the corner to the cage in the back and wait for her to come back so that she can find the bag for him. My dad does what she says and goes to the back. At this time, some $6 an hour renta-cop asks my dad what he's doing. My dad tells him that he was told to come back here and wait. Renta-cop tells my dad that he better back up b/c he's about to get arrested. My dad tells him he was just doing as told b/c he was trying to pick up a piece of luggae. Renta-cop tells me dad to step off (at this point my dad is about ready to go postal). At this time, the girl comes back and they start looking for the bag. They look around and my dad sees the bag on the conveyour sp? belt overhead roaming around. The girl says that can't be the bag b/c that is for outgoing baggage. My dad says that IS the bag so she stops the belt and pulls it down. My dad hands her the ticket and they match it up with the tag on the bag. Sure enough, it matches...they had it getting on ANOTHER train!!?? WTF.
Needless to say, Amtrak fvcking sucks.
Amtrak cuts would end Chicago-New Orleans service
June 15, 2005
BY ANDREW TAYLOR ASSOCIATED PRESS
[Ad]
WASHINGTON-- Amtrak would have to end all of its cross-country routes, service between Chicago and New Orleans and the Auto Train to Florida under big cuts in taxpayer subsidies approved Wednesday by a House subcommittee.
The proposal was part of a transportation bill that would reduce Amtrak's budget by more than half and limit federal subsidies to $30 per passenger per ride.
The cuts, which would require House and Senate approval, would not apply to most Amtrak service in the Northeast corridor and shorter corridor routes in the Midwest and California.
The subcommittee chairman, Rep. Joe Knollenberg, said those routes account for 80 percent of Amtrak's ridership. He said some money-losing routes, such as the Sunset Limited between Los Angeles and Orlando, require federal subsidies of more than $400 per passenger.
"Congress will no longer sanction extremely unprofitable routes," said Knollenberg, R-Mich.
Amtrak generally has stronger support in the Senate, where its money-losing routes serve many states represented by majority Republicans.
Even Knollenberg seemed to predict that his proposal would be modified later in negotiations with the Senate.
The plan drew protests from subcommittee Democrats who said it would unfairly punish rural residents.
"There will be 31 states who lose all passenger rail service completely," said Rep. John Olver, D-Mass.
Knollenberg said the measure would not mandate the closure of any routes and that state and local governments could decide to subsidize them.
The overall bill would provide $550 million for Amtrak, including $110 million for passenger subsidies on money-losing routes. Amtrak requested $1.8 billion in federal funds for the budget year that begins Oct. 1 and says the House proposal would force a shutdown.
During last year's budget cycle, lawmakers funded Amtrak at $1.2 billion.
"The practical impact of $550 million in federal support would be the same as zero funding for Amtrak, and they know it," said Amtrak's president and chief executive, David Gunn.
Transportation Secretary Norman Y. Mineta said in a statement that the subcommittee's action "sends the same signal as that of the administration: Amtrak must reform."
The administration contends that eliminating operating subsidies would leave the passenger rail system with stronger routes and entice subsidies from local governments.
Among the routes that would lose federal subsidies are the Empire Builder, which runs across the Northern Plains; the Lake Shore Limited from the East Coast to Chicago; and the California Zephyr from Chicago to Oakland, Calif.
In his February budget, Bush proposed eliminating Amtrak's operating subsidy and setting aside $360 million to run trains along the Northeast Corridor if the railroad were to cease operating.
Originally posted by: vi_edit
I bought a ticket for my Dad the first week of June. It was *supposed* to be a quick 6 hour ride from Omaha, NE to western, IL.
Train was supposed to leave at 5:30AM. We get down there. It's delayed. 6 FREAKING HOURS. So we take him back down at 11:30 and drop him off. He ends up sitting there for close to an hour before the train ends up taking off.
They move about 20 minutes down the rail and come to a stop. And sit there for 45 minutes. Then they move another 40 minutes. And sit for another 30 minutes.
All in all the 6 hour ride that was supposed to get him in at 11:30AM ended up taking over 8.5 hours and got in at 9:30 at night.
He wasn't overly thrilled about the experience to say the least.
