anyone seen the new 120hz "motion" TV's?

Schadenfroh

Elite Member
Mar 8, 2003
38,416
4
0
Yes, if you visit B&M stores that have the lntxx71f line from samsung (120hz), they have a "demo mode" that will chop the screen in two and label each standard and 120hz for you to compare the differences.

But, mind the source and beware of TBEs:p
 

aphex

Moderator<br>All Things Apple
Moderator
Jul 19, 2001
38,572
2
91
I've seen it on the Samsungs, and to be honest, i LOVED it. Never seen anything so smooth in my life. It had some slight issues with fast action taking place over a slower moving background, but overall I loved the effect it had.
 

Chapbass

Diamond Member
May 31, 2004
3,147
96
91
i dunno really what i think about it. I just quickly glanced at a samsung screen that had it with pirates of the caribbean playing (the swordfight scene between jack and will in the blacksmith shop). Made me a little queesy and looked a little fake. If i got used to it, however, i could see myself not wanting to go back to "normal tv"
 

pennylane

Diamond Member
Apr 28, 2002
6,077
1
0
I have one (Sony SXRD). For motion flow, it has off, normal, and high. I usually leave it on either off or normal. It works but it does look creepy sometimes.

The big plus for 120hz TV's is true 24fps film without resorting to 3:2 pulldown. 120 is divisible by 24, so all the frames are shown an equal number of times. For 60hz TV's some frames are shown more than others and means the motion isn't smooth sometimes.
 

Muadib

Lifer
May 30, 2000
18,110
908
126
Originally posted by: fanerman91
I have one (Sony SXRD). For motion flow, it has off, normal, and high. I usually leave it on either off or normal. It works but it does look creepy sometimes.

The big plus for 120hz TV's is true 24fps film without resorting to 3:2 pulldown. 120 is divisible by 24, so all the frames are shown an equal number of times. For 60hz TV's some frames are shown more than others and means the motion isn't smooth sometimes.
What do you mean by it does look creepy?

I saw it with a buddy, and he's getting a XBR with it. If I were in the market, I'd get it too.

 

BaliBabyDoc

Lifer
Jan 20, 2001
10,737
0
0
Originally posted by: Muadib
Originally posted by: fanerman91
I have one (Sony SXRD). For motion flow, it has off, normal, and high. I usually leave it on either off or normal. It works but it does look creepy sometimes.

The big plus for 120hz TV's is true 24fps film without resorting to 3:2 pulldown. 120 is divisible by 24, so all the frames are shown an equal number of times. For 60hz TV's some frames are shown more than others and means the motion isn't smooth sometimes.
What do you mean by it does look creepy?

I saw it with a buddy, and he's getting a XBR with it. If I were in the market, I'd get it too.
Watching all three levels on the xx71 Samsung:

Off: arguably the best looking LCD in a given price range

Normal/Mid: clearly better, great separation (3D) and motion

High: freakish (possibly b/c it's not how we are USED TO watching TV), the actors and other real set items are great, the CGI 'pops' to the extent that it looks fake (granted it is). In essence, real things look fantastic; while 'created' items do not . . . IMO.
 

Shawn

Lifer
Apr 20, 2003
32,236
53
91
can someone explain how this works? I don't understand why it would be "creepy".
 

jpeyton

Moderator in SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones
Moderator
Aug 23, 2003
25,375
142
116
It looks highly artificial for movies, and looks nothing viewing a movie in a theater.
 

BaliBabyDoc

Lifer
Jan 20, 2001
10,737
0
0
Originally posted by: jpeyton
It looks highly artificial for movies, and looks nothing viewing a movie in a theater.

Animation is fantastic. Chicken Little was great on a XBR4. I bet games will be outstanding, once the developers get to work.

Any well made movie with great visuals that aren't dependent on CGI (Legends of Brad Pitt's Hair, Glory) would be outstanding at 120Mhz.

But for those of us that are Sci-Fi, Action/Adventure fans, I'm not sure it works. Real things look real, fake elements look real fake.
 

Lurknomore

Golden Member
Jul 3, 2005
1,308
0
0
I actually like this effect, and no, it doesn't look "video" at all.
I'll wait for a 120hz AMP lcd with rgb leds that has all the triple-ball-effect, stutter issues worked out. Kinda like an updated 81 series Sammy with 120hz, fixed AMP and from what I've heard, rgb instead of white led clusters.
 

olds

Elite Member
Mar 3, 2000
50,110
774
126
Originally posted by: Lurknomore
I actually like this effect, and no, it doesn't look "video" at all.
I'll wait for a 120hz AMP lcd with rgb leds that has all the triple-ball-effect, stutter issues worked out. Kinda like an updated 81 series Sammy with 120hz, fixed AMP and from what I've heard, rgb instead of white led clusters.
Can you get sprinkles with that?
:confused:

 

Shawn

Lifer
Apr 20, 2003
32,236
53
91
Originally posted by: BaliBabyDoc
Originally posted by: jpeyton
It looks highly artificial for movies, and looks nothing viewing a movie in a theater.

Animation is fantastic. Chicken Little was great on a XBR4. I bet games will be outstanding, once the developers get to work.

Any well made movie with great visuals that aren't dependent on CGI (Legends of Brad Pitt's Hair, Glory) would be outstanding at 120Mhz.

But for those of us that are Sci-Fi, Action/Adventure fans, I'm not sure it works. Real things look real, fake elements look real fake.

Why would there be a difference between real and CGI?
 

Exterous

Super Moderator
Jun 20, 2006
20,557
3,728
126
I work at a place that sells them and I have set them up for people. It seems pretty split between people who like it and people who hate it. I would strongly recommend going to see them in action before forking over the extra $. Most sets will allow you to set it to some combination of high, medium, low and off (some add a demo option as well). Also you can play around with the settings to see what you like at the store. Generally it seems to be in the 'medium' range for the people who like it
 

pennylane

Diamond Member
Apr 28, 2002
6,077
1
0
I'd like to chime in again and say that 120hz is ALWAYS a good thing if you get a blu-ray player.

The "motion flow" interpolated frames stuff is debatable, but that is separate from 120hz. You can always turn it off.

120hz lets you play 24fps content (ie, movies) without any 3:2 pull down. Each frame is displayed 5 times with no fancy signal processing and everything is like in movie theaters. (120 is divisible by 24)

Regular 60hz TV's have to do 3:2 pulldown, some frames of a 24fps film have to be displayed more than others (or fancy telecine techniques have to be done) in order to display a 24fps source onto a 60hz TV. (60 is not divisible by 24)
 

newnameman

Platinum Member
Nov 20, 2002
2,219
0
0
Originally posted by: fanerman91
I'd like to chime in again and say that 120hz is ALWAYS a good thing if you get a blu-ray player.

The "motion flow" interpolated frames stuff is debatable, but that is separate from 120hz. You can always turn it off.

120hz lets you play 24fps content (ie, movies) without any 3:2 pull down. Each frame is displayed 5 times with no fancy signal processing and everything is like in movie theaters. (120 is divisible by 24)

Regular 60hz TV's have to do 3:2 pulldown, some frames of a 24fps film have to be displayed more than others (or fancy telecine techniques have to be done) in order to display a 24fps source onto a 60hz TV. (60 is not divisible by 24)
But remember that many (most?) 120hz tvs aren't capable of doing 5:5 pulldown , so you're stuck with either regular 3:2 pulldown or motion flow.
 

pennylane

Diamond Member
Apr 28, 2002
6,077
1
0
Originally posted by: newnameman
Originally posted by: fanerman91
I'd like to chime in again and say that 120hz is ALWAYS a good thing if you get a blu-ray player.

The "motion flow" interpolated frames stuff is debatable, but that is separate from 120hz. You can always turn it off.

120hz lets you play 24fps content (ie, movies) without any 3:2 pull down. Each frame is displayed 5 times with no fancy signal processing and everything is like in movie theaters. (120 is divisible by 24)

Regular 60hz TV's have to do 3:2 pulldown, some frames of a 24fps film have to be displayed more than others (or fancy telecine techniques have to be done) in order to display a 24fps source onto a 60hz TV. (60 is not divisible by 24)
But remember that many (most?) 120hz tvs aren't capable of doing 5:5 pulldown , so you're stuck with either regular 3:2 pulldown or motion flow.

I *think* some (maybe many, maybe almost all) 2007 TV's aren't capable of doing 5:5 pulldown from a 60i source. But 120hz TV's should be able to play 1080p24 sources just fine (ie, a decent blu-ray player) just fine. Correct me if I'm wrong.
 

gchanjam

Member
Apr 26, 2006
97
0
0
I personally don't like it from what I've seen but if I were in the market, I'd get it just in case. I watched Transformers with it and the best explanation I can come up with is it looks like a very clean daytime soap opera if that makes any sense.
 

JackBurton

Lifer
Jul 18, 2000
15,993
14
81
Originally posted by: newnameman
Originally posted by: fanerman91
I'd like to chime in again and say that 120hz is ALWAYS a good thing if you get a blu-ray player.

The "motion flow" interpolated frames stuff is debatable, but that is separate from 120hz. You can always turn it off.

120hz lets you play 24fps content (ie, movies) without any 3:2 pull down. Each frame is displayed 5 times with no fancy signal processing and everything is like in movie theaters. (120 is divisible by 24)

Regular 60hz TV's have to do 3:2 pulldown, some frames of a 24fps film have to be displayed more than others (or fancy telecine techniques have to be done) in order to display a 24fps source onto a 60hz TV. (60 is not divisible by 24)
But remember that many (most?) 120hz tvs aren't capable of doing 5:5 pulldown , so you're stuck with either regular 3:2 pulldown or motion flow.

Samsungs (71s and I believe 81s) and Sonys (XBR4/5) are capable of 5:5 pulldown.
 

imported_cinder

Senior member
Sep 19, 2006
258
0
0
I hated the motion blur. It makes the blu-ray movies look almost too realistic, as dumb as that sounds. In my opinion, the director did not intend for you to see the movie so clearly that you can see the where the makeup starts and ends on an actor/actress's face. I watched transformers on a motion blur samsung and then I watched it from the same BRD player on a different non-120hz samsung and I like the one without. Keep in mind that the motion blur can be turned off, and that sometimes the tv's that have it do have extra features such as higher contrast as well. In the end, it's all about personal preference. You should just go to a big box store and compare the two and see what you yourself like better.
 

BigJ

Lifer
Nov 18, 2001
21,330
1
81
I saw it on a TV in CircuitCity and it made my head swim a little bit. I just honestly did not like how it was setup on the Samsung I was watching.