Anyone running Seti on a Ram Drive?

santar72

Senior member
Feb 20, 2001
467
0
76
I been thinking about running Seti's Cli client on a Ram drive. Is it much faster or am I wasting my time. How stable is it?
 

cnhoff

Senior member
Feb 6, 2001
724
0
0
For me, a possible speed increase was the main motivation for trying out a ramdisc and I was disappointed. The Wu took exactly the same time as when Seti was running from a harddisc. Also my hd was spinning up about once an hour, which is certainly much worse for the hd than running all the time, so I think you would definetely be wasting your time with a ramdisc!
 

santar72

Senior member
Feb 20, 2001
467
0
76
No speed increase at all? :( So much for that idea. Must think of some more idea to make quicker WU besides buying a mainframe.
 

CyGoR

Platinum Member
Jun 23, 2001
2,017
0
0
Eh.. guys? I am currently using a ramdrive for Win2K called "RamdiskNT". I do notice a nice speed increasment. My HD is set to off after 30mins. and RamdiskNT makes a backup of the ramdrive every 5 ours. My system is very stable so 5 ours is good enough. But when it crashes I lose everything on it. First one WU was cruncht in about 15ours on a Dual Celeron (Abit BP6:)) I run 2 clients at the same time, one on both processors. When I run just one client is takes about 13ours. Anyway, now it only takes about 12ours even when I run 2 clients!! So that gives me a profit of 3ours x 2 = 6ours total!!
You could just try it out, maybe it works for you aswell..
Don't mind my crappy English please..
Dutch Rules;)...
 

Netopia

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
4,793
4
81
CyGoR,

I don't know anything about SETI... or at least almost nothing.... but... my guess is that you saw the dramatic increase because SETI makes use of your CPU's level 2 Cache quite a bit. With your small L2 cache, there is probably less of a performace hit when you run all in memory. I could be wrong, but that is perhaps why you saw a difference and others didn't.

Joe
 

Poof

Diamond Member
Jul 27, 2000
4,305
0
0
I'd agree with Netopia. Most of what SETI is doing regarding disk access is writing to the state file. However having a Celly with only 128K L2 would mean more of the program being shunted into the RAM and then later to a pagefile, than would occur with a P3/P4, the Xeons, or Tbirds. Keeping that stuff out of the pagefile would help performance in any case.