Anyone played The Last Remnant???

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

aka1nas

Diamond Member
Aug 30, 2001
4,335
1
0
Originally posted by: erwos
I own it for the 360, too. It's flawed, but I think it's a reasonably good game in spite of it. I am chuckling at a bunch of supposedly "smarter" PC gamers tripping all over the combat system, though.

I am currently playing the demo and deciding if I want to get it for PC. So far, my biggest gripe is that all the menus state the buttons from the console controls and it's very non-obvious what they map to on a keyboard.

I'm also having a hard time figuring out what to do with 3/4ths of the items in the game. I can't seem to equip items to anyone but my main character (even though every person has an individual inventory), and I have no idea why certain characters want to seize certain loot items or why I should let them.
 

nestlewater

Banned
Mar 3, 2009
185
0
0
This game sux. seriously. We all play them for the cheezy damage collision effects, this game even at 25x16, is not cheezy enough. The colors too, not bright enough, just bores me.
 

A Casual Fitz

Diamond Member
May 16, 2005
4,649
1,018
136
Originally posted by: jonks
Originally posted by: Saga
Haha you PC gamers got suckered into buying this abomination of a game!

Go do a search for the name in the console section. You'll find nothing but rants and not a nice thing to say about this game. Should have aborted that shit.

The critical reviews were almost universal in citing frame rate issues as reasons for the low scores. Gamespot re-review for the pc version gave it an 8.0 compared to a 6.5 for xbox.

Mmm I'm actually thinking about getting this for PC. It looked amazing on 360 before the practically unanimous bad reviews it got. Can anyone talk more about the differences specifically so I can figure out if the PC version is worth it?
 

zerogear

Diamond Member
Jun 4, 2000
5,611
9
81
Originally posted by: A Casual Fitz
Originally posted by: jonks
Originally posted by: Saga
Haha you PC gamers got suckered into buying this abomination of a game!

Go do a search for the name in the console section. You'll find nothing but rants and not a nice thing to say about this game. Should have aborted that shit.

The critical reviews were almost universal in citing frame rate issues as reasons for the low scores. Gamespot re-review for the pc version gave it an 8.0 compared to a 6.5 for xbox.

Mmm I'm actually thinking about getting this for PC. It looked amazing on 360 before the practically unanimous bad reviews it got. Can anyone talk more about the differences specifically so I can figure out if the PC version is worth it?

What differences? Its the same game.
 

RyanPaulShaffer

Diamond Member
Jul 13, 2005
3,434
1
0
Originally posted by: A Casual Fitz
Originally posted by: jonks
Originally posted by: Saga
Haha you PC gamers got suckered into buying this abomination of a game!

Go do a search for the name in the console section. You'll find nothing but rants and not a nice thing to say about this game. Should have aborted that shit.

The critical reviews were almost universal in citing frame rate issues as reasons for the low scores. Gamespot re-review for the pc version gave it an 8.0 compared to a 6.5 for xbox.

Mmm I'm actually thinking about getting this for PC. It looked amazing on 360 before the practically unanimous bad reviews it got. Can anyone talk more about the differences specifically so I can figure out if the PC version is worth it?

Just download the PC demo and try it yourself...
 

aka1nas

Diamond Member
Aug 30, 2001
4,335
1
0
The game is awesome now that I have gotten into it. It's very reminiscent of the Ogre Battle/Tactics Ogre series. I can see where some of you might have been disappointed if you went into it expecting Final Fantasy, though.
 
S

SlitheryDee

I've been playing for a few days now and I have mixed feeling about this game. The storyline looks pretty decent for the part that I've seen, but getting to the next bit of story takes too long. I like the graphics overall, but the graphics aren't as good as the performance hit the game takes when I max them out. The option to double the speed of the battles is great, since battling is what you spend 90% of your time doing.

I hate that side quests are mandatory to get your party strong enough to fight the enemies you have to beat to progress the story. If they're going to make them mandatory they should have worked them directly into the main portion of the game so that you encounter them in the course of the storyline rather than giving you the illusion that they are "optional". I say this because the battles go from ridiculously easy while you're exploring, to so hard that the enemies are taking out your entire party in a couple of turns for the boss fights. I'm used to RPGs that give you enough XP during the course of the story to at least finish the story without doing anything else if you don't want to I guess.

Maybe I'm just dumb, but I can't really figure out how the game decides what specific combat/mystic arts to use when I give commands to a union. It doesn't always seem to make sense, and I can't help but think that I would be able to do a much better job given control of the individual characters myself. For instance, why oh why would there not be a heal option of any sort when a party is weak, has enough AP, and includes several characters with healing arts. I can't say how many times I've lost unions because this has happened, but it's been a lot and it's EXTREMELY frustrating. Also, even when a party is high on AP I'll notice that the mystic/combat arts commands will often have the party leader or some single other member performing a special move with the rest of the party performing regular attacks. The only exception is when the "Turn it Around" or "Give it all You've Got", or some other special command is randomly available. When you give me a menu option for "Attack with Mystic Arts", is it unreasonable for me to expect all the characters with mystic arts to use them? they should include other options for mixed mystic/regular, combat/regular, combat/mystic, and all regular attacks. The lack of control over the character's abilities also makes it difficult to fashion unions for maximum effectiveness. There seems to be no way to make a union attack with special attack moves for that combat-heavy characters while healing or using mystic arts for members of the same union. If I'm lucky enough to draw a "Turn it around" command they seem to do that, but that's not always available when I need it. Why do they offer formations that are obviously designed for mage/fighter combinations when I'm rarely able to take full advantage of such a group? Also, there seem to be times when the game will just do whatever it wants to regardless of which command I choose. I've noticed characters performing mystic attacks or even healing on rare occasions when I choose the commands that are supposed to make them perform simple attacks with their current weapon.

All this results in the feeling that I'm not really in control of things, but rather just pressing buttons to make the game get through battles in whatever way it wants to. The only real way I can influence things significantly is by choosing the groups my unions attack in such ways as to cause flank and rear attacks and tie up enemy unions to minimize their ability to flank and rear attack me. It may be that the game designers wanted that to be the main focus anyway, but that seems less than satisfying to me. I guess I'm a micromanager at heart.
 

KINGGABBO

Member
Mar 26, 2008
55
0
0
I have it for Xbox 360 and I like it. I haven't played it in a while, but not because it is not good. It is confusing as hell at first though, I have to admit. After a couple of hours, you start to understand the battle system and stuff.
 

hypeMarked

Senior member
Apr 15, 2002
708
0
71
So um... For the people that doesn't like the PC version, interested in selling it to me? Feel free to PM me.

Thanks,
 

girlpower4ever

Senior member
Jan 3, 2006
371
0
76
www.gamergirlsunite.com
I've played The Last Remnant.
It's an awesome game with the unreal 3 engine graphics with horrible console feeling loading times.

If you want to enjoy the full game play of this game, be ready to have some hefty powerhouse PC Specs.
Even at Full settings and everything at max, my ati 4850 lagged in the battle phase.
Be sure to have at least 2gb of ram, 1.5 at least for the game and 512 for operating system resources.
Be sure to pack in a dual core cpu, core 2 or phenom.
It will take you around 4-20 hours to get use to the game play, afterwards, it's a cake walk as long as you can heal and revive your allies.

Graphics are intense, if not, then make it intense with full AA 16x and anistropic filtering at 16x
I would say a 4870 can run this at max settings,
gtx 260 and above should run this fine.
4850 sli can probably run it.

I was able to play the game because I got myself an ati 4850 from anandtech.
 

jonks

Lifer
Feb 7, 2005
13,918
20
81
So I'm giving this a go now. I understand (I think) the basics of combat, but still get my ass handed to me way too often. Hopefully as I powerup some and play for a few more hours I'll understand where I'm going wrong. Enjoyable thus far and easy to get into, combat complexities aside.

So I'm 10+ hours in and loving it. Been up till 3am bleary eyed going on just one...more....quest....