Kaido
Elite Member & Kitchen Overlord
- Feb 14, 2004
- 50,714
- 6,749
- 136
I've never done any serious video editing, is Final Cut Pro or whatever that superior to the Windows solutions? The big draw for me would be having a Unix environment with MS Office. They'd have to have nVidia cards before I bite though.
Final Cut Pro was amazing, but Apple kind of ignored all of their other products (cough Mac Mini cough) to focus on iPhone development for awhile there, and then they released FCP-X, which came out half-baked. A lot of people jumped ship to go to Windows because they didn't feel cared about...they waited & waited and then got a mediocre replacement editor (fwiw, it's gotten better over time). Adobe really killed it with Premiere (cross-platform) for video editing, and many other software packages are now available on both platforms, so it became compelling to switch to Windows because you could run the same software & get a (vastly) cheaper computer, which is a big deal when you're running a video production shop & can literally save tens of thousands of dollars on hardware without losing out on features. Really, the only two serious reasons to stay on Mac for video editing are (1) if you still like using Shake (oldie but a goodie), and (2) if you explicitly need/want to use Smoke (Autodesk), which is Mac-only, both of which are fairly specific pieces of software.
I still have friends who edit on Macs, but the large majority of professionals I know are now on Windows, despite being Mac fans. While I'm not a huge fan of Windows 10 (endless updates + spying = yuck), it is (1) very stable (surprisingly so), and (2) has excellent graphical support (which is continuously updated), so it does make for a solid editing platform. It's not like you're really losing features outside of the *nix-based OS, either...Dell has 8K monitors, you can get the latest GPU's anytime you want (you can stick a Titan V or a 24GB Quadro M6000 into your machine anytime you want), you can order parts off Amazon to easily build a 44-core dual-CPU machine with a terabyte of RAM, etc.
I'm still a Mac fanboy, but I've had a hard time justifying Apple's lateness to the party. $13k for a fully-loaded iMac Pro with an integrated video card that you can never, ever upgrade seems like a huge waste, unless you're totally fixated on an AIO machine, but if you look at most of the reviewers on Youtube, they have a truckload of accessories (like big Thunderbolt NAS boxes), so it's not like they're really saving space or anything on their desks lol. And Apple still has yet to release the modular Mac Pro, and there is pretty much zero word on the Mac Mini (last update was over 3 years ago), so I don't feel like they are very committed to professionals still. I just read that developers made like $86 billion from the iOS App Store since inception, so obviously their focus isn't really on the pro's, which makes sense because they're not nearly as big of a market, and Apple hasn't really cared about making progress in the business world (like ever), despite Office now working pretty good on OSX. It is what it is.
I think the iMac Pro is way cool & definitely wouldn't mind owning one, but we've even talked about retiring our Hackintosh at home & switching to Windows just to get a more modern GPU in there (TonyMac has support for up to the 1080, but not the 1080 Ti at the present time). Premiere, Photoshop, Lightroom, daVinci, etc. all run great on Windows. I'd really rather not use Windows, but economics & hardware support being what they are...well, $5,000 for the base model is an awful lot of moola. Very cool device, but I'd go a different route personally.